Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 693, 2020 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32408872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many parents continue to smoke around their children despite the widely known risks of children's exposure to tobacco smoke. We sought to learn about parental smoking behavior around children from parents' perspective. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 65 smoking parents or partners of smoking parents of children up to age 7, to learn about home smoking rules, behaviours performed to try to protect children, and smoking-related conflicts, from parents' perspective. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and thematic analysis performed. Recruitment was challenging due to the sensitive nature of the topic. RESULTS: Many parents described smoking around their children in certain areas of the home, outdoors, and in what they consider to be open or ventilated areas. Participants emphasized efforts to protect their children and described various mitigating practices but held mixed views as to their effectiveness. Parents had different conceptions of which areas or distances were considered 'safe'. Many smoking parents described conflicts both internal and with other family members regarding the protection of children. Some parents who continue to smoke around their children despite understanding the health risks felt powerless to effect change, as well as being uncertain as to the effectiveness of their protective strategies; others were aware but reluctant to change. CONCLUSION: Findings shed light on some of the difficulties faced by smoking parents and obstacles to maintaining a smoke-free environment for their children, providing insight for the type of information and support required to help parents better protect their children from exposure to tobacco smoke. Awareness of health risks associated with secondhand smoke was demonstrated, yet parents in smoking families were confused regarding which rules and behaviours best protect children from exposure to tobacco smoke. Parents were sometimes aware that their smoking 'rules' and mitigating practices were limited in their effectiveness. Guidelines should be provided explaining how and when exposure occurs and how to keep children safe.


Asunto(s)
Salud Infantil , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Padres , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco , Fumar Tabaco , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Familia , Conflicto Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control
2.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 20(11): 1369-1377, 2018 09 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29059387

RESUMEN

Introduction: Forty percent of young children worldwide are exposed to the harmful effects of tobacco smoke, predominantly by parental smoking. Little is known about why parents regularly expose their children to these risks; perhaps parents underestimate the degree of exposure. Qualitative methods were used to investigate parental perceptions of tobacco smoke exposure. Methods: Sixty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with parents of young children in smoking families in central Israel. Parents were asked to explain what "exposure to smoking" meant. Thematic analysis was performed, a conceptual model of perceptions was built, and misconceptions were identified. Results: Parents reported that exposure occurs when smoke or smokers are visible, when smoke can be smelled, felt, or inhaled, or when it "reaches" an individual. Conversely, some believed that exposure does not occur in the absence of odor, visible smoke, or smokers or if smoking occurs outdoors or in indoor ventilated environments. Proximity in space and time affected perceptions of exposure; some parents believed that smoke does not spread far but dissipates rapidly. There was some uncertainty regarding whether or not exposure was occurring. Conclusions: Awareness of child exposure to tobacco smoke among parents in this study was based on sensory perceptions in the context of the physical environment. The limited capacity of humans to perceive tobacco smoke can lead to misconceptions about exposure. In order to protect children, parents must be convinced that exposure can occur even in situations where they are unable to sense it. Implications: Parents use sensory perceptions (sight, smell, and feel) in the context of the physical environment to assess whether or not their children are exposed to tobacco smoke. Because 85% of smoke is invisible and the sense of smell is unreliable, assessments based on sensory perceptions cannot provide accurate information about the presence of tobacco smoke. In order to protect children, parents must be convinced that exposure can occur even in situations where they are unable to sense it. The scientific information summarized here about exposure in common situations should be useful in persuading parents to protect their children. Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered as a Phase I study which is part of a larger research endeavor entitled: A program to protect young children from tobacco smoke exposure. Registration number: NCT01335178.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Padres/psicología , Fumadores/psicología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/psicología , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Fumar/epidemiología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Nicotiana , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 98(11): 1439-45, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26160037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Widespread tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) of children suggests that parents may be unaware of their children's exposure. Biomarkers demonstrate exposure and may motivate behavior change, but their acceptability is not well understood. METHODS: Sixty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with parents of young children, in smoking families in central Israel. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Consent to testing was associated with desire for information, for reassurance or to motivate change, and with concerns for long-term health, taking responsibility for one's child, and trust in research. Opposition to testing was associated with preference to avoid knowledge, reluctance to cause short-term discomfort, perceived powerlessness, and mistrust of research. Most parents expressed willingness to allow measurement by urine (83%), hair (88%), or saliva (93%), but not blood samples (43%); and believed that test results could motivate behavior change. CONCLUSIONS: Parents were receptive to non-invasive child biomarker testing. Biomarker information could help persuade parents who smoke that their children need protection. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Biomarker testing of children in smoking families is an acceptable and promising tool for education, counseling, and motivation of parents to protect their children from TSE. Additionally, biomarker testing allows objective assessment of population-level child TSE.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Nicotiana/química , Padres/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humo , Adulto , Actitud , Biomarcadores/análisis , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...