RESUMEN
There is a constant search for biodegradable polymers with biocompatible characteristics. However, the reported materials are rarely tested for their immunostimulatory properties, which is an important issue as immune cells activated by the polymers might cause their rejection and lead to further injury to the host tissues. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine if biodegradable polymers are able to activate RAW 264.7 macrophages. Aliphatic polyesters, poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), poly(L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) (PLTMC), poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) (PGLA), poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PGLCap) and poly(glycolide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PGCap), processed into foils by slip-casting, were characterized in terms of their structure ((1)H-NMR, GPC, DSC) and surface properties (chemical composition, water contact angle, surface free energy, topography and roughness). RAW 264.7 cells were cultured on the materials for 3 or 5 days and their adherence, numbers of apoptotic/necrotic cells, as well as production of several cytokines/chemokines and other inflammation-related molecules (matrix metalloproteinases, nitric oxide) was evaluated. The study demonstrated that PLLA and PGLA did not influence macrophage activation and survival. In contrast, PLTMC, PGLCap and PGCap significantly decreased macrophage adherence, increased ratio of apoptosis and up-regulated synthesis/release of numerous inflammatory mediators. Thus, the latter materials might initiate an undesired inflammatory reaction. The above effects of the polymers were attributed to their high hydrophobicity and low polarity due to the presence of ε-caproyl blocks (PGLCap and PGCap), and/or high flexibility and susceptibility to mechanical deformation due to low glasstransition temperature (PLTMC, PGLCap and PGCap). In conclusion, while PLLA and PGLA do not affect macrophage functioning, the other materials (PLTMC, PGLCap, PGCap) up-regulate macrophage activity.