RESUMEN
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to overwhelm intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide, and improved prediction of mortality among COVID-19 patients could assist decision making in the ICU setting. In this work, we report on the development and validation of a dynamic mortality model specifically for critically ill COVID-19 patients and discuss its potential utility in the ICU. Methods: We collected electronic medical record (EMR) data from 3222 ICU admissions with a COVID-19 infection from 25 different ICUs in the Netherlands. We extracted daily observations of each patient and fitted both a linear (logistic regression) and non-linear (random forest) model to predict mortality within 24 h from the moment of prediction. Isotonic regression was used to re-calibrate the predictions of the fitted models. We evaluated the models in a leave-one-ICU-out (LOIO) cross-validation procedure. Results: The logistic regression and random forest model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 [0.85; 0.88] and 0.86 [0.84; 0.88], respectively. The recalibrated model predictions showed a calibration intercept of -0.04 [-0.12; 0.04] and slope of 0.90 [0.85; 0.95] for logistic regression model and a calibration intercept of -0.19 [-0.27; -0.10] and slope of 0.89 [0.84; 0.94] for the random forest model. Discussion: We presented a model for dynamic mortality prediction, specifically for critically ill COVID-19 patients, which predicts near-term mortality rather than in-ICU mortality. The potential clinical utility of dynamic mortality models such as benchmarking, improving resource allocation and informing family members, as well as the development of models with more causal structure, should be topics for future research.
RESUMEN
In this study we demonstrate the first direct comparison between synchrotron x-ray propagation-based CT (PB-CT) and cone-beam breast-CT (CB-CT) on human mastectomy specimens (N = 12) including different benign and malignant lesions. The image quality and diagnostic power of the obtained data sets were compared and judged by two independent expert radiologists. Two cases are presented in detail in this paper including a comparison with the corresponding histological evaluation. Results indicate that with PB-CT it is possible to increase the level of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) keeping the same level of dose used for the CB-CT or achieve the same level of CNR reached by CB-CT at a lower level of dose. In other words, PB-CT can achieve a higher diagnostic potential compared to the commercial breast-CT system while also delivering a considerably lower mean glandular dose. Therefore, we believe that PB-CT technique, if translated to a clinical setting, could have a significant impact in improving breast cancer diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Mama/patología , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía/métodos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , SincrotronesRESUMEN
Results are presented of a feasibility study of three-dimensional X-ray tomographic mammography utilising in-line phase contrast. Experiments were performed at SYRMEP beamline of Elettra synchrotron. A specially designed plastic phantom and a mastectomy sample containing a malignant lesion were used to study the reconstructed image quality as a function of different image processing operations. Detailed evaluation and optimization of image reconstruction workflows have been carried out using combinations of several advanced computed tomography algorithms with different pre-processing and post-processing steps. Special attention was paid to the effect of phase retrieval on the diagnostic value of the reconstructed images. A number of objective image quality indices have been applied for quantitative evaluation of the results, and these were compared with subjective assessments of the same images by three experienced radiologists and one pathologist. The outcomes of this study provide practical guidelines for the optimization of image processing workflows in synchrotron-based phase-contrast mammo-tomography.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation using a high-resolution computed radiology (CR) system devoted to mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed at the Synchrotron Radiation for Medical Physics (SYRMEP) beamline of the Elettra synchrotron radiation (SR) facility in Trieste (Italy); X-ray beams were in the range 16-22 keV with a high degree of monochromaticity and spatial coherence. The CR system evaluated is the FCR Profect CS by Fujifilm Global. The first images were obtained from test objects and surgical breast specimens. Images obtained using SR and both screen-film and the CR system were compared with images of the same samples acquired with digital mammography equipment. In view of the good quality of the results obtained, the CR system was used in two mammographic examinations with SR. RESULTS: Images acquired using SR and both screen-film and CR were obtained with the same level of delivered dose. Image quality obtained with CR was similar or superior to that of screen-film images. Moreover, the digital images obtained with SR were always better than those acquired using the digital mammography system. CONCLUSIONS: Phase-contrast mammography with SR using the studied CR system is a feasible option.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mamografía/métodos , Sincrotrones , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Fantasmas de Imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por ComputadorRESUMEN
The purpose of this study is evaluation of therapeutic impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer patients that cannot be imaged adequately with traditional radiology: dense breasts, microcalcifications suspicious for carcinoma in situ or discordance between mammography and ultrasound. A review was performed of 493 patients' records: determination of breast MRI effect on clinical management was made for the selected 70 cases by analysing pre-MRI and post-MRI therapeutic plans. Analysis of final pathology was useful to determine if the change in surgical plan prompted by MRI was appropriate. Breast MRI added clinical information in 52.9% of patients that resulted in 44.3% of management changes that were judged as appropriate in 83.9% of cases. Breast MRI provides additional useful information, but causes more extensive surgery (40%) with no proven prognostic benefit. MRI should be considered optional in the clinical staging of breast cancer and performed in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
A clinical program for X-ray phase contrast (PhC) mammography with synchrotron radiation (SR) has been started in March 2006 at the SYRMEP beamline of Elettra, the SR facility in Trieste, Italy. The original beamline layout has been modified substantially and a clinical facility has been realized. In order to fulfill all security requirements, dedicated systems have been designed and implemented, following redundancy criteria and "fail safe" philosophy. Planar radiographic images are obtained by scanning simultaneously the patient and the detector through the stationary and laminar SR beam. In this first phase of the project a commercial screen-film system has been used as image receptor. Upon approval by the respective authorities, the mammography program is about half way to conclusion. Up to now about 50 patients have been examined. The patients are volunteers recruited by the radiologist after conventional examinations at the hospital resulted in an uncertain diagnosis. As an example one case of PhC SR mammography is shown and compared to conventional digital mammography. Preliminary analysis shows the high diagnostic quality of the PhC SR images that were acquired with equal or less delivered dose compared to the conventional ones.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mamografía/instrumentación , Refractometría/instrumentación , Sincrotrones/instrumentación , Tomografía por Rayos X/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/instrumentación , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/instrumentación , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
We present the first observation of self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE) in a free-electron laser (FEL) in the vacuum ultraviolet regime at 109 nm wavelength (11 eV). The observed free-electron laser gain (approximately 3000) and the radiation characteristics, such as dependency on bunch charge, angular distribution, spectral width, and intensity fluctuations, are all consistent with the present models for SASE FELs.
RESUMEN
The role of Doppler techniques in the differential diagnosis of benign from malignant solid breast lesions remains to be defined; indeed, it is still debated whether the diagnostic findings of Doppler US add further information to mammographic and B-mode US results. We investigated the diagnostic effectiveness of Doppler techniques in the differential diagnosis of breast nodules, especially in a selected group of patients with questionable diagnosis because of atypical morphological features or benign appearance detected in women over 40 years old. Color Doppler studies were performed on 111 breast nodules with solid features at US; 53 vascularized lesions were also studied with duplex Doppler. All the nodules were submitted to biopsy, which demonstrated 6 nonvascularized lesions to be complicated cysts. There were 105 solid breast nodules (65 benign and 40 malignant). Color Doppler US showed vascular signals in 71% of benign nodules, mainly at the periphery. 12% of benign nodules had Doppler signals of malignancy at color Doppler US; 92% of malignant lesions was vascularized, with irregular intratumoral signals in 37% of them. The peak systolic velocity and the resistive index were higher in malignant tumors (p < 0.02); peak systolic velocity changed in malignant lesions according to tumor size (p < 0.01). Color Doppler correctly suspected malignancy in 62% of the nodules with questionable features; conversely, 31% of the nodules with questionable findings and no color Doppler signs of malignancy proved malignant at biopsy. In conclusion, the role of Doppler studies remains currently limited in the differential diagnosis of solid breast lesions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
To compare the diagnostic value and the role of plain radiographic magnification and of ultrasonography (US) in breast cancer evaluation, 83 malignant tumors were studied with mammography, plain radiographic magnification and US. Microcalcifications were not included in our study. All tumors subsequently underwent histology or cytology. In our series, the malignant nature of the lesion was unquestionably proved in 53% of cases while a possible malignancy was suspected in 36% and a benign nature was incorrectly suspected in 11% of cases with mammography. The diagnostic value of plain radiographic magnification was compared with that of US; breast patterns, mammographic and clinical findings were considered. As for breast patterns, plain radiographic magnification was more accurate in evaluating fatty breast than both mammography and US, allowing the correct diagnosis of 58% of questionable mammographic findings, vs. 33% of US. On the contrary, US was more accurate in dense breasts, allowing the correct diagnosis of 77.7% of mammographic misdiagnoses vs. 33.3% only of plain radiographic magnification. As far as mammography is concerned, US was more accurate than plain radiographic magnification in the assessment of round masses (71.4% vs. 38.1%, respectively), whereas plain radiographic magnification was more accurate than US in stellate masses (100% vs. 92.7%, respectively). As far as clinical findings are concerned, plain radiographic magnification sensitivity was substantially the same in the assessment of symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions (91.5% vs. 89%, respectively), whereas US sensitivity was higher in symptomatic (97%) than in asymptomatic (69%) lesions. The rate of false-negative US diagnoses (14.4%) was higher than those of mammography and of plain radiographic magnification. Negative US findings must be considered with caution and are not sufficient to settle a radiologic doubt.