RESUMEN
Restless Development's youth-led model places trained Volunteer Peer Educators (VPEs), aged 18-25 years, in schools to teach HIV prevention and reproductive health (RH). VPEs also run youth centers, extracurricular and community-based activities. This evaluation assesses (i) program effects on students' HIV/RH knowledge, attitudes and behaviors using a non-randomized quasi-experimental design among 2133 eighth and ninth grade students in 13 intervention versus 13 matched comparison schools and (ii) program costs. Intervention students had significantly higher levels of knowledge related to HIV [odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.19; P < 0.01] and RH (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.21-2.49; P < 0.01), more positive attitudes toward people living with HIV and greater self-efficacy to refuse unwanted sex and access condoms. No evidence of differences in ever having had sex was found (28% in the intervention; 29% in the comparison schools). However, intervention students were more likely not to have had sex in the previous year (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.56; P < 0.05) and to have had only one sex partner ever (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.00-2.03; P < 0.05). The average annual cost of the program was US$21 per beneficiary. In conclusion, the youth-led model is associated with increased HIV and RH knowledge and self-efficacy and lowered levels of stigma and sexual risk-taking behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Educación en Salud/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Grupo Paritario , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Adulto Joven , ZambiaRESUMEN
For almost a decade, single-dose nevirapine (sdNVP) has been proven to be a safe and effective drug for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. With the advent of the use of more efficacious combination therapy strategy in reducing mother-to-child transmission, sdNVP has been relegated as a lower tier intervention. Availability of infrastructural capacity coupled with the practical reality that very few women attend an antenatal clinic more than once makes universal implementation of combination therapy a challenge. This retrospective review examined PMTCT programmatic indicators following the introduction of sdNVP at first contact in selected sites. Data from 79 PMTCT sites was reviewed from April 2006 to March 2007 (when sdNVP was offered only after 32 weeks) and compared to the period of April 2007-March 2008. In the pre-intervention period (April 2006-March 2007), the monthly average of pregnant women who received sdNVP per site was 5.02. Post-intervention (April 2007-March 2008), the monthly average increased by 59% to 7.97 (p-value<0.05). In pre-intervention period when sdNVP was dispensed at 32 weeks, the average proportion of pregnant women who received antiretroviral prophylaxis was 59%. This increased to 82% after the intervention. Current systems for dispensing sdNVP may be used as a foundation for implementation of more efficacious PMTCT regimens. The sdNVP administered at first contact should be a safety net for women who are unable to receive more efficacious regimen.
Asunto(s)
Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Nevirapina , Embarazo , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Países en Desarrollo , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Viral , Femenino , VIH , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Nevirapina/uso terapéutico , Pacientes , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perinatal/tendencias , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Atención Primaria de Salud , ZambiaRESUMEN
In industrialized countries, the initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is based on virological, immunological and clinical markers. The objective of this study was to identify treatment gaps when ART initiation is based on clinical staging alone. The method employed was a retrospective study of 5784 patients enrolled in an HIV treatment programme in two urban and two rural sites in Ghana. Of the patients, 29.5% were in clinical Stages I and II and had a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count less than 200 cells/mm(3). Significantly more patients in clinical Stage I from urban sites (37.0%) had a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count less than 200 cells/mm(3) as compared with patients from rural sites (23.8%) (P value <0.05). In addition, more men (39.9%) in clinical Stage I had a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count less than 200 cells/mm(3) when compared with women (27.4%) (P value <0.05). In conclusion, clinical staging cannot identify a relatively large number of patients who need ART. A wider availability of CD4+ T-lymphocyte count testing will optimize the identification of patients eligible for ART.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Países en Desarrollo , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/métodos , Infecciones por VIH , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Femenino , Ghana/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Población Rural , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
There are acute disparities in pharmaceutical access between developing and industrialized countries. Developing countries make up approximately 80% of the world's population but only represent approximately 20% of global pharmaceutical consumption. Among the many barriers to drug access are the potential consequences of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. Many developing countries have recently modified their patent laws to conform to the TRIPS standards, given the 2005 deadline for developing countries. Safeguards to protect public health have been incorporated into the TRIPS Agreement; however, in practice governments may be reluctant to exercise such rights given concern about the international trade and political ramifications. The Doha Declaration and the recent Decision on the Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health may provide more freedom for developing countries in using these safeguards. This paper focuses on Ghana, a developing country that recently changed its patent laws to conform to TRIPS standards. We examine Ghana's patent law changes in the context of the Doha Declaration and assess their meaning for access to drugs of its population. We discuss new and existing barriers, as well as possible solutions, to provide policy-makers with lessons learned from the Ghanaian experience.