Epicardial adipose tissue, pulmonary veins anatomy, and the P-wave/PR interval ratio in young patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncommon in the youngest population. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume has been proposed as an independent AF risk factor. Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of the EAT, the anatomy of the pulmonary veins (PVs), and electrocardiogram (ECG) features in these young patients with AF. Methods: Sixty-two patients divided in 2 groups, one with history of paroxysmal AF treated with ablation and the other, a control group, all younger than 30 years of age, were included. Computed tomography scans were performed in both groups to estimate the PVs anatomy and EAT volume. Twelve-lead ECGs were performed in all patients. Patients underwent follow-up in our outpatient clinic (35.9 ± 18.3 months). Results: In the AF group, the EAT volume around the left atrium was 22.25 ± 9.3 cm3 compared with 12.61 ± 3.37 cm3, showing a statistically significance difference (P = .003). Family history resulted to be another significant risk factor (P = .009). During follow-up, 67.7% of the patients treated were still free of events. The anatomy and morphology of the right-sided PVs seemed to play a more consistent role in the patients with AF recurrences (P = .04). The P/PR ratio, a new ECG index, seemed predict AF recurrences after ablation (P = .03). Conclusion: The abundance of EAT seems related to the risk of developing AF in young patients. The recurrence of AF is about 33% and does not seem related to the EAT volume, but rather to the anatomy of the PVs. A higher P/PR ratio might suggest recurrences.

Risk assessment of post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction using 45-min short resting Holter electrocardiographic recordings.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in post-myocardial infarction (post-MI) patients remains a challenging task. Several electrocardiographic noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) have been associated with adverse outcomes and were used to refine risk assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of NIRFs extracted from 45-min short resting Holter ECG recordings (SHR), in predicting ventricular tachycardia inducibility with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in post-MI patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: We studied 99 post-MI ischemia-free patients (mean age: 60.5 ± 9.5 years, 86.9% men) with LVEF ≥40%, at least 40 days after revascularization. All the patients underwent PVS and a high-resolution SHR. The following parameters were evaluated: mean heart rate, ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular complexes, couplets, tachycardias), QTc duration, heart rate variability (HRV), deceleration capacity, heart rate turbulence, late potentials, and T-wave alternans. RESULTS: PVS was positive in 24 patients (24.2%). HRV, assessed by the standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN), was significantly decreased in the positive PVS group (42 ms vs. 51 ms, p = .039). SDNN values <50 ms were also associated with PVS inducibility (OR 3.081, p = .032 in univariate analysis, and 4.588, p = .013 in multivariate analysis). No significant differences were identified for the other NIRFs. The presence of diabetes, history of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and LVEF <50% were also important predictors of positive PVS. CONCLUSIONS: HRV assessed from SHR, combined with other noninvasive clinical and echocardiographic variables (diabetes, STEMI history, LVEF), can provide an initial, practical, and rapid screening tool for arrhythmic risk assessment in post-MI patients with preserved LVEF.

Association of non-invasive electrocardiographic risk factors with left ventricular systolic function in post-myocardial infarction patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PRESERVE-EF study.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic non-invasive risk factors (NIRFs) have an important role in the arrhythmic risk stratification of post-myocardial infarction (post-MI) patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, their specific relation to left ventricular systolic function remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between NIRFs and LVEF in the patients included in the PRESERVE-EF trial. METHODS: We studied 575 post-MI ischemia-free patients with LVEF≥40% (mean age: 57.0 ± 10.4 years, 86.2% men). The following NIRFs were evaluated: premature ventricular complexes, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), late potentials (LPs), prolonged QTc, increased T-wave alternans, reduced heart rate variability, and abnormal deceleration capacity with abnormal turbulence. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant relationship between LPs (Chi-squared = 4.975; p < .05), nsVT (Chi-squared = 5.749, p < .05), PVCs (r= -.136; p < .01), and the LVEF. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that LPs (p = .001) and NSVT (p < .001) were significant predictors of the LVEF. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that LPs (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.02-3.05; p = .004) and NSVT (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.18-5.04; p = .001) were independent predictors of the mildly reduced LVEF: 40%-49% versus the preserved LVEF: ≥50%. CONCLUSION: Late potentials and NSVT are independently related to reduced LVEF while they are independent predictors of mildly reduced LVEF versus the preserved LVEF. These findings may have important implications for the arrhythmic risk stratification of post-MI patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an innovative therapeutic approach in patients (pts) with a diagnosis of refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) after the use of drugs, radiofrequency catheter ablation, and/or defibrillator (ICD) implant. The current efficacy data of SABR are limited and several prospective clinical studies are ongoing to support the use of ablative radiation dose to control VT. The aim of the current prospective pilot study is to report the efficacy and tolerability of SABR in ICD implanted pts with refractory VT in our centre. Non-invasive electroanatomical mapping (EAM), cardiac computed tomography (CT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission (FDG-PET)-CT scan were used and combined with a radiation CT scan. A dose prescription of 25 Gy in a single dose was delivered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Linac-based. The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined as a reduction in ICD shocks after SABR treatment, while the secondary endpoint was safety. Six consecutive pts (five males and one female) implanted with an ICD and with three or more VT were enrolled. One pts died after 1 month, due to end-stage heart failure. Two pts experienced ICD shocks in VT 2 and 5 months after treatment. Three pts experienced no more ICD shocks on VT after therapy. Our data suggest the efficacy and safety of SABR treatment in pts with VT. Larger dataset of pts and longer follow-up are otherwise required to validate the impact of SABR as a standardized treatment in these pts.

Noninvasive risk factors for the prediction of inducibility on programmed ventricular stimulation in post-myocardial infarction patients with an ejection fraction ≥40% at risk for sudden cardiac arrest: Insights from the PRESERVE-EF study.

BACKGROUND: In the PRESERVE-EF study, a two-step sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification approach to detect post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% at risk for major arrhythmic events (MAEs) was used. Seven noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) were extracted from a 24-h ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) and a 45-min resting recording. Patients with at least one NIRF present were referred for invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) and inducible patients received an Implantable Cardioverter - Defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: In the present study, we evaluated the performance of the NIRFs, as they were described in the PRESERVE-EF study protocol, in predicting a positive PVS. In the PRESERVE-EF study, 152 out of 575 patients underwent PVS and 41 of them were inducible. For the present analysis, data from these 152 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the NIRFs examined, the presence of signal averaged ECG-late potentials (SAECG-LPs) ≥ 2/3 and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) ≥1 eposode/24 h cutoff points were important predictors of a positive PVS study, demonstrating in the logistic regression analysis odds ratios 2.285 (p = .027) and 2.867 (p = .006), respectively. A simple risk score based on the above cutoff points in combination with LVEF < 50% presented high sensitivity but low specificity for a positive PVS. CONCLUSION: Cutoff points of NSVT ≥ 1 episode/24 h and SAECG-LPs ≥ 2/3 in combination with a LVEF < 50% were important predictors of inducibility. However, the final decision for an ICD implantation should be based on a positive PVS, which is irreplaceable in risk stratification.

Temporal changes of noninvasive electrocardiographic risk factors for sudden cardiac death in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PRESERVE-EF study.

BACKGROUND: Several noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) have been proposed for sudden cardiac death risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction (post-MI) patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). However, it remains unclear if these factors change over time. METHODS: We evaluated seven electrocardiographic NIRFs as they were described in the PRESERVE-EF trial in 80 post-MI patients with EF ≥ 40%, at least 40 days after revascularization and 1 year later. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 56 ± 10 years, and 88% were men. Mean EF was 50 ± 5%. The prevalence of (a) positive late potentials (27.5% vs. 28.8%, p = .860), (b) >30 premature ventricular complexes/hour (8.8% vs. 11.3%, p = .598), (c) nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (8.8% vs. 5%, p = .349), (d) standard deviation of normal RR intervals <75 ms (3.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000), (e) QTc derived from 24-hr electrocardiography >440 ms (men) or >450 ms (women) (17.5% vs. 17.5%, p = 1.000), (f) deceleration capacity ≤4.5 ms and heart rate turbulence onset ≥0% and slope ≤2.5 ms (2.5% vs. 3.8%. p = 1.000), and (g) ambulatory T-wave alternans ≥65 µV in two Holter channels (6.3% vs. 6.3%, p = 1.000) were similar between the two measurements. However, five patients (6.3%) without any NIRFs during the first assessment had at least one positive NIRF at the second assessment and six patients (7.5%) with at least one NIRF at baseline had no positive NIRFs at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: While the prevalence of the examined electrocardiographic NIRFs between the two examinations was similar on a population basis, some patients without NIRFs at baseline developed NIRFs at 1 year and vice versa, highlighting the need for risk factor reassessment during follow-up.

Arrhythmic risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction: the PRESERVE EF study.

AIMS: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) annual incidence is 0.6-1% in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≥40%. No recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use exist in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We introduced a combined non-invasive/invasive risk stratification approach in post-MI ischaemia-free patients, with LVEF ≥ 40%, in a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients with at least one positive electrocardiographic non-invasive risk factor (NIRF): premature ventricular complexes, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, late potentials, prolonged QTc, increased T-wave alternans, reduced heart rate variability, abnormal deceleration capacity with abnormal turbulence, were referred for programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), with ICDs offered to those inducible. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major arrhythmic event (MAE), namely sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate ICD activation or SCD. We screened and included 575 consecutive patients (mean age 57 years, LVEF 50.8%). Of them, 204 (35.5%) had at least one positive NIRF. Forty-one of 152 patients undergoing PVS (27-7.1% of total sample) were inducible. Thirty-seven (90.2%) of them received an ICD. Mean follow-up was 32 months and no SCDs were observed, while 9 ICDs (1.57% of total screened population) were appropriately activated. None patient without NIRFs or with NIRFs but negative PVS met the primary endpoint. The algorithm yielded the following: sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.8%, positive predictive value 22%, and negative predictive value 100%. CONCLUSION: The two-step approach of the PRESERVE EF study detects a subpopulation of post-MI patients with preserved LVEF at risk for MAEs that can be effectively addressed with an ICD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02124018.

Signal-averaged electrocardiography: Past, present, and future.

Signal-averaged electrocardiography records delayed depolarization of myocardial areas with slow conduction that can form the substrate for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. This technique has been examined mostly in patients with coronary artery disease, but its use has been declined over the years. However, several lines of evidence, derived from hitherto clinical data in patients with healed myocardial infarction, indicate that signal-averaged electrocardiography remains a valuable tool in risk stratification, especially when incorporated into algorithms encompassing invasive and noninvasive indices. Such an approach can aid the more precise identification of candidates for device therapy, in the context of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. This article reappraises the value of signal-averaged electrocardiography as a predictor of arrhythmic outcome in patients with ischemic heart disease and discusses potential future indications.

Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing.

Since the first transvenous pacemaker implantation, which took place 50 years ago, important progress has been achieved in pacing technology. Consequently, at present, more than 700,000 pacemakers are implanted annually worldwide. However, conventional pacemakers' implantation has a non-negligible risk of periprocedural and long-term complications associated with the transvenous leads and pacemaker pocket. Recently, leadless pacing systems have emerged as a therapeutic alternative to conventional pacing systems that provide therapy for patients with bradyarrhythmias, while eliminating potential transvenous lead- and pacemaker pocket-related complications. Initial studies have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety of currently developed leadless pacing systems, compared to transvenous pacemakers. In the present paper, we review the current evidence and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of this novel technology. New technological advances may allow the next generation of leadless pacemakers to further expand, thereby offering a wireless cardiac pacing in future.

The subcutaneous ICD as an alternative to the conventional ICD system: Initial experience in Greece and a review of the literature.

The introduction of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in clinical practice has revolutionized our therapeutic approach for both primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), as it has proven to be superior to medical therapy in treating potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and has resulted in reduced mortality rates. However, implantation of a conventional ICD carries a non-negligible risk of periprocedural and long-term complications associated with the transvenous ICD leads. The entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) has recently emerged as a therapeutic alternative to the conventional ICD for patients with various cardiopathies and who are at high risk of SCD. The main advantage is the avoidance of vascular access and thus avoidance of complications associated with transvenous leads. Patients without pacing indications, such as bradycardia, a need for antitachycardia pacing or cardiac resynchronization, as well as those at higher risk of complications from transvenous lead implantation are perfect candidates for this novel technology. The subcutaneous ICD has proven to be equally safe and effective compared to transvenous ICD systems in early clinical trials. Further technical improvements of the system will likely lead to the expansion of indications and widespread use of this technology. In the present review, we discuss the indications for this system, summarize early clinical experiences and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of this novel technology. In addition, we present the first two cases of subcutaneous cardioverter defibrillator system implantation in Greece.