Reaching rural patients through otolaryngology visiting consultant clinics.

Providing otolaryngology care to rural populations is a major challenge. In this study, we focus on rural outreach by the otolaryngology workforce in Iowa, a state with a high proportion of rural residents. Using data from 2013, we find that almost half (46%) of Iowa-based otolaryngologists participate in outreach. Along with colleagues from adjoining states, Iowa otolaryngologists staffed more than 2100 in-person clinic days in 76 mainly rural sites. This system of rural outreach has expanded access from 20 to 85 of the 99 counties in Iowa. These efforts improve access for more than 1 million residents out of a total population of 3 million. However, this improved level of access comes at a cost as visiting otolaryngologists drove an estimated 17,000 miles per month. This established approach to serving rural patients may be negatively impacted by changes under the Affordable Care Act.

Trends in medical oncology outreach clinics in rural areas.

PURPOSE: To examine the long-term trends in medical oncology outreach in Iowa, a state with a high proportion of rural residents, and to assess the involvement of the 2011 Iowa oncology workforce in visiting consultant clinics using a unique data source. METHODS: Outreach locations and clinic frequencies are tracked annually in the Visiting Medical Consultant Database (Carver College of Medicine) along with the physicians' primary practice locations. Growth in the number of cities served and number of clinic days from 1989 to 2011 was analyzed using joinpoint analysis. Data from 2011 were used to estimate the trip length for participating oncologists. RESULTS: The number of rural cities served by medical oncology outreach increased significantly between 1989 and 1996. Clinic days grew significantly in two periods: 1989 to 1998 and 2003 to 2005. In 2011, more than 2,100 clinic days were provided in 66 sites (95% of clinic days in rural areas). Almost half of all Iowa-based oncologists regularly participate in outreach. Oncologists staffing visiting consultant clinics in Iowa drive an estimated 21,000 miles per month. CONCLUSIONS: For more than 20 years, visiting medical oncologists have brought cancer care to rural patients in Iowa. Access to cancer care in rural Iowa (ie, clinic days) increased significantly in the post-Medicare Modernization Act period (after 2005). High participation rates and travel burdens may influence oncologist training and retention strategies. Because the Affordable Care Act seeks to expand access for vulnerable populations (eg, rural elderly), it is critical to better understand the existing system of rural cancer care delivery.

Where do patients with cancer in Iowa receive radiation therapy?

PURPOSE: Multiple studies have shown survival benefits in patients with cancer treated with radiation therapy, but access to treatment facilities has been found to limit its use. This study was undertaken to examine access issues in Iowa and determine a methodology for conducting a similar national analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All Iowa residents who received radiation therapy regardless of where they were diagnosed or treated were identified through the Iowa Cancer Registry (ICR). Radiation oncologists were identified through the Iowa Physician Information System (IPIS). Radiation facilities were identified through IPIS and classified using the Commission on Cancer accreditation standard. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2010, 113,885 invasive cancers in 106,603 patients, 28.5% of whom received radiation treatment, were entered in ICR. Mean and median travel times were 25.8 and 20.1 minutes, respectively, to the nearest facility but 42.4 and 29.1 minutes, respectively, to the patient's chosen treatment facility. Multivariable analysis predicting travel time showed significant relationships for disease site, age, residence location, and facility category. Residents of small and isolated rural towns traveled nearly 3× longer than urban residents to receive radiation therapy, as did patients using certain categories of facilities. CONCLUSION: Half of Iowa patients could reach their nearest facility in 20 minutes, but instead, they traveled 30 minutes on average to receive treatment. The findings identified certain groups of patients with cancer who chose more distant facilities. However, other groups of patients with cancer, namely those residing in rural areas, had less choice, and some had to travel considerably farther to radiation facilities than urban patients.

Access to chemotherapy services by availability of local and visiting oncologists.

PURPOSE: Geographic disparities have raised important questions about factors related to treatment choice and travel time, which can affect access to cancer care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Iowa residents who received chemotherapy regardless of where they were diagnosed or treated were identified through the Iowa Cancer Registry (ICR), a member of the SEER program. Oncologists and their practice locations, including visiting consulting clinics (VCCs), were tracked through the Iowa Physician Information System. Oncologists, VCCs, and patients were mapped to hospital service areas (HSAs). RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2010, 113,885 newly diagnosed invasive cancers were entered into ICR; among patients in whom these cancers were diagnosed, 31.6% received chemotherapy as a first course of treatment. During this period, 106 Iowa oncologists practiced in 14 cities, and 82 engaged in outreach to 85 VCCs in 77 rural communities. Of patients receiving chemotherapy, 63.0% resided in an HSA that had a local oncologist and traveled 21 minutes for treatment on average. In contrast, 29.3% of patients receiving chemotherapy resided in an HSA with a VCC, and 7.7% resided in an HSA with no oncology provider. These latter two groups of patients traveled 58 minutes on average to receive chemotherapy. Availability of oncologists and VCCs affected where patients received chemotherapy. The establishment of VCCs increased access to oncologists in rural communities and increased the rate that chemotherapy was administered in rural communities from 10% to 24%, a notable increase in local access. CONCLUSION: Access to cancer care is dependent on the absolute number of providers, but it is also dependent on their geographic distribution.

Improving access to urologic care for rural populations through outreach clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of outreach clinics on access to urologic care in a state with a large rural population. This is especially pertinent given the predicted shortage of urologists over the next decade and the trend toward practice in urban area. METHODS: We analyzed provider level data from urologic practices within the state of Iowa using information from 2 publicly available sources: (1) the Office of Statewide (Iowa) Clinical Education Programs, which collects detailed information on visiting consultant urologists (VCU), and (2) the Iowa Physician Information System, which tracks demographic and professional data on all active physicians in Iowa. Factors analyzed included percent of counties and Iowans served by urologists and travel distances/times for patients and physicians. RESULTS: Currently, 57% of Iowans are within 30 minutes of a urologist's primary office, increasing to 84% with VCU outreach clinics. Fifty-five urologists, including 40 of 69 (58%) of Iowa-based urologists, perform outreach within Iowa, accounting for 198 clinic days and 20,400 miles of travel per month. CONCLUSION: Within Iowa, the lack of rural urologists has been mitigated, in part, by an extensive VCU network. However, improved access has required significant effort from urologists in both time and miles traveled. This study is the first to show how a rural state can effectively use physician outreach clinics to provide specialized urologic care to underserved, rural communities.

The influence of visiting consultant clinics on measures of access to cancer care: evidence from the state of Iowa.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visiting consultant clinics on measures of access to cancer care for rural patients. DATA SOURCES: 2010 Visiting Medical Consultant Database for the state of Iowa (Carver College of Medicine) and the Iowa Physicians Information System (Carver College of Medicine). STUDY DESIGN: We compared shortest driving times to the nearest medical oncologist for all Iowa census tracts under two scenarios: including only primary practice locations and adding monthly visiting consultant clinic locations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For rural Iowans, the median driving time to the closest site for medical oncology care falls from 51.6 to 19.2 minutes when monthly visiting consultant clinics are considered. CONCLUSIONS: Including visiting consultant clinics has a significant impact on measures of geographic access to cancer care.

Intensive care unit utilization and interhospital transfers as potential indicators of rural hospital quality.

CONTEXT: Obtaining meaningful information from statistically valid and reliable measures of the quality of care for disease-specific care provided in small rural hospitals is limited by small numbers of cases and different definitive care capacities. An alternative approach may be to aggregate and analyze patient services that reflect more generalized care processes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the applicability of intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and interhospital transfers as potential indicators of quality in rural hospitals. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of ICU utilization and interhospital transfer practices in Iowa's Critical Access (CAH), rural, rural referral, and urban hospitals. FINDINGS: Rural hospitals have fewer resources, provide a more limited range of definitive care services, and rely to a greater extent on transferring patients to other hospitals capable of providing the required definitive care. Examining ICU utilization and interhospital transfer patterns we found (1) that lower percentages of patients receive ICU care in smaller facilities; (2) higher transfer rates for both ICU and non-ICU patients in CAH hospitals; (3) shorter average lengths of stay for ICU patients from smaller hospitals who were transferred; and (4) lower mortality rates for CAH and rural hospital ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS: Examining ICU utilization and interhospital transfer patterns offers potential insights into rural hospital quality measurement and comparisons.

Spectrum of general surgery in rural Iowa.

PURPOSE: One-quarter of the United States of America's population lives in rural areas, but only 12.3% of physicians live and work in rural areas. Nearly one-quarter of the counties in Iowa boast a patient-to-physician ratio of 3000:1. The number of rural surgeons is decreasing, and current residency programs may not optimally train graduates for the spectrum of surgical practice seen in rural areas. The scope of surgical practice differs between rural and non-rural surgeons, and in this study, we identified the types of surgery performed by 6 rural Iowa surgeons and compared the practices of rural and non-rural surgeons in Iowa. METHODS: Data from personal interviews and questionnaires with rural Iowa general surgeons and rural Iowa hospital administrators and results from the Iowa General Surgeon Practice Opportunity Survey were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In 1995, 31 general surgeons were recruiting a general surgeon partner, of which 25 were in rural Iowa communities. Eighteen rural Iowa Hospital administrators were actively recruiting a general surgeon during the same time period. In September 2000, many of these positions remained unfilled. A total of 4963 surgical procedures were performed by 6 rural Iowa general surgeons in Iowa in 1995. Endoscopic, alimentary, and obstetrics and gynecologic procedures were the most frequently performed. Excluding endoscopy, 26% of all procedures performed were procedures not among the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medial Education (ACGME) list of requirements for graduating surgical residents. CONCLUSIONS: Rural Iowa general surgeons perform a large volume of surgery and more subspecialty procedures than do their non-rural counterparts. Surgical residency programs need to more adequately train residents interested in rural general surgery in an effort to increase the pool of graduating surgical residents trained to deal with the scope of procedures a rural practice offers. This will help reduce the shortage of rural general surgeons in the United States of America.