Tuberculosis and Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Anti-TNFα Treatment: Insights From a French Multicenter Study and Systematic Literature Review With Emphasis on Paradoxical Anti-TNFα Resumption.

Background: The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) has revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, susceptibility to active tuberculosis (TB) is associated with this therapy and requires its discontinuation. The risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in this population is poorly understood, as is the safety of resuming anti-TNFα. Methods: This French retrospective study (2010-2022) included all TB cases in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNFα in 6 participating centers. A systematic literature review was performed on TB-IRIS and anti-TNFα exposure. Results: Thirty-six patients were included (median age, 35 years; IQR, 27-48). TB was disseminated in 86% and miliary in 53%. IRIS occurred in 47% after a median 45 days (IQR, 18-80). Most patients with TB-IRIS (93%) had disseminated TB. Miliary TB was associated with IRIS risk in univariate analysis (odds ratio, 7.33; 95% CI, 1.60-42.82; P = .015). Anti-TB treatment was longer in this population (median [IQR], 9 [9-12] vs 6 [6-9] months; P = .049). Anti-TNFα was resumed in 66% after a median 4 months (IQR, 3-10) for IBD activity (76%) or IRIS treatment (24%), with only 1 case of TB relapse. Fifty-two cases of TB-IRIS in patients treated with anti-TNFα were reported in the literature, complicating disseminating TB (85%) after a median 42 days (IQR, 21-90), with 70% requiring anti-inflammatory treatment. Forty cases of TB-IRIS or paradoxical reaction treated with anti-TNFα were also reported. IRIS was neurologic in 64%. Outcome was mostly favorable (93% recovery). Conclusions: TB with anti-TNFα treatment is often complicated by IRIS of varying severity. Restarting anti-TNFα is a safe and effective strategy.

Real-world comparison of the effectiveness between ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis exposed to at least one anti-TNF agent.

BACKGROUND: Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be considered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) but head-to-head trials are lacking. AIM: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-TNF failure in UC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, we included consecutive adult patients with UC, with partial Mayo score >2 and prior anti-TNF exposure, treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab between January 2019 and August 2022. Comparisons were performed using propensity score analyses (inverse probability of treatment weighting). RESULTS: Among a total of 293 patients included, 151 and 142 received vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. After propensity-score analysis, steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) (Mayo score partial ≤ 2) was achieved at week 16 in 38.0% and 40.3%, of patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively (aOR = 1.11 [0.39-3.13], p = 0.85). Rate of SFCR in patients exposed to one line, 2 lines and 3 lines of biologics/small molecules among patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab were respectively 53.3% vs 62.1% (p=0.52), 44.4% vs 33.8% (p=0.52) and 2.6% vs 19.1% (p=0.027). Endoscopic remission (SFCR and endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) and histological remission (SFCR, endoscopic remission and Nancy histological index ≤1) at W16 were achieved in respectively, 5.3% vs 17.5% (aOR = 3.77 [1.25-11.36], p=0.018) and 2.1% vs 11.1% (aOR = 5.85 [1.47-23.30], p=0.012) in vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups. No difference regarding the risk of drug discontinuation between the two groups (aHR = 1.03 [0.51-2.08], p = 0.92) were observed. While no factor was identified for vedolizumab, primary failure to at least one biologic/small molecule (OR=0.31, 95%CI [0.11-0.82], p=0.018) was significantly associated with decreased rate of SFCR among patients treated with ustekinumab. CONCLUSION: While no difference in terms of short-term clinical remission was observed, ustekinumab appears to be more effective than vedolizumab to induce endoscopic and histological remission at week 16 after failure of anti-TNFs in UC.

Systemically delivered adipose stromal vascular fraction mitigates radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome by immunomodulating the inflammatory response through a CD11b+ cell-dependent mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) treatment promoted the regeneration of the intestinal epithelium, limiting lethality in a mouse model of radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome (GIS). The SVF has a heterogeneous cell composition; the effects between SVF and the host intestinal immunity are still unknown. The specific role of the different cells contained in the SVF needs to be clarified. Monocytes-macrophages have a crucial role in repair and monocyte recruitment and activation are orchestrated by the chemokine receptors CX3CR1 and CCR2. METHODS: Mice exposed to abdominal radiation (18 Gy) received a single intravenous injection of SVF (2.5 × 106 cells), obtained by enzymatic digestion of inguinal fat tissue, on the day of irradiation. Intestinal immunity and regeneration were evaluated by flow cytometry, RT-PCR and histological analyses. RESULTS: Using flow cytometry, we showed that SVF treatment modulated intestinal monocyte differentiation at 7 days post-irradiation by very early increasing the CD11b+Ly6C+CCR2+ population in the intestine ileal mucosa and accelerating the phenotype modification to acquire CX3CR1 in order to finally restore the F4/80+CX3CR1+ macrophage population. In CX3CR1-depleted mice, SVF treatment fails to mature the Ly6C-MCHII+CX3CR1+ population, leading to a macrophage population deficit associated with proinflammatory environment maintenance and defective intestinal repair; this impaired SVF efficiency on survival. Consistent with a CD11b+ being involved in SVF-induced intestinal repair, we showed that SVF-depleted CD11b+ treatment impaired F4/80+CX3CR1+macrophage pool restoration and caused loss of anti-inflammatory properties, abrogating stem cell compartment repair and survival. CONCLUSIONS: These data showed that SVF treatment mitigates the GIS-involving immunomodulatory effect. Cooperation between the monocyte in SVF and the host monocyte defining the therapeutic properties of the SVF is necessary to guarantee the effective action of the SVF on the GIS.

[Biotherapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis]. / Biothérapies dans le traitement de la rectocolite hémorragique.

BIOTHÉRAPIES DANS LE TRAITEMENT DE LA RECTOCOLITE HÉMORRAGIQUE. Le traitement de la rectocolite hémorragique a considérablement évolué puisqu'il doit, pour la plupart des patients,permettre une cicatrisation des lésions inflammatoires coliques et non plus une simple rémission des symptômes cliniques. Ceci est désormais possible grâce aux biothérapies dont trois classes principales sont autorisées dans la rectocolite hémorragique. Les anti-TNF, classe la plus ancienne, ont fait la preuve de leur efficacité et peuvent être utilisés en première ligne de traitement après échec des traitements conventionnels. Parmi eux, seul l'infliximab est recommandé dans les colites aiguës graves. Le védolizumab, anti-intégrine, peut également être utilisé en première ligne, avec un excellent profil de tolérance mais pas d'effet sur les manifestations extradigestives. Les anti-interleukines 12 et 23 (ustékinumab), bientôt rejointes par d'autres anticorps spécifiques de l'interleukine 23, sont également très efficaces et leur tolérance excellente, mais se positionnent en échec d'une première ligne de biothérapie. S'ajoutent à cet arsenal les inhibiteurs de JAK, petites molécules orales, d'action très puissante mais dont le profil médiocre de tolérance les réserve aux sujets jeunes, sans comorbidité et généralement après échec de deux lignes de biothérapie. Tous ces traitements sont actuellement disponibles à domicile, par voie sous-cutanée, ou orale pour les inhibiteurs de JAK. Ceci implique pour les patients une bonne connaissance, acquise par l'éducation thérapeutique, et la mise en place d'un suivi coordonné avec tous les acteurs de soins : gastroentérologues, médecins généralistes et infirmières de coordination.

BIOTHERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ULCERATIVE COLITIS. The treatment of ulcerative colitis has evolved considerably since it must, for most patients, allow healing of inflammatory colonic lesions and no longer a simple remission of clinical symptoms. This is now possible thanks to biotherapies, of which three main classes are authorized in ulcerative colitis. Anti-TNFs, the oldest class, have proven their effectiveness and can be used as first-line treatment after failure of conventional treatments. Among them, only infliximab is recommended in severe acute colitis. Vedolizumab, anti-integrin, can also be used in first line with an excellent safety profile but no effect on extradigestive manifestations. The anti-interleukin 12/23 ustekinumab, soon joined by other antibodies specific for interleukin 23, is also very effective and its tolerance excellent, but is positioned after a failure of a first biologic. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, small oral molecules, with a very powerful action, but whose poor tolerance profile reserves them for young subjects, without comorbidity and generally after failure of two lines of biologics. All these treatments are currently available at home, by subcutaneous route, or orally for JAK inhibitors. This implies their good knowledge and the implementation of patient follow-up coordinated with all healthcare providers: gastroenterologists, general practitioners and IBD coordinating nurses.

Real-world comparison of effectiveness between tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis exposed to at least one anti-TNF agent.

BACKGROUND: Data comparing tofacitinib and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) are lacking. AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with UC who had prior exposure to anti-TNF therapy METHODS: In this multicentre study, we included consecutive patients with UC ≥18 years old with partial Mayo score >2 and prior anti-TNF exposure, who started tofacitinib or vedolizumab between January 2019 and June 2021. Comparisons were performed using propensity score analyses (inverse probability of treatment weighting). RESULTS: Overall, 126 and 178 patients received tofacitinib and vedolizumab, respectively. Intensified induction (vedolizumab infusion at week 10 or tofacitinib 10 mg b.d until week 16) was performed in 28.5% and 41.5% of patients, respectively. After propensity-score analysis, corticosteroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2) was achieved at week 16 in 45.1% and 40.2% of patients receiving tofacitinib and vedolizumab, respectively (aOR = 0.82 [0.35-1.91], p = 0.64). Endoscopic improvement (corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) (aOR = 0.23[0.08-0.65], p = 0.0032) and histological healing (endoscopic improvement + Nancy histological index ≤1) (13.4% vs 3.2%, aOR = 0.21[0.05-0.91], p = 0.023) were higher at week 16 in patients treated with tofacitinib. No factor was predictive of tofacitinib effectiveness. At least one primary failure to a biologic (OR = 0.46[0.22-0.99], p = 0.049), partial Mayo score >6 (OR = 0.39[0.17-0.90], p = 0.029) and CRP level > 30 mg/L at baseline (OR = 0.08[0.01-0.85], p = 0.036) were associated with vedolizumab failure. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib and vedolizumab are effective in UC after failure of anti-TNF agents. However, tofacitinib seems more effective, especially in severe disease and primary failure to biologics.

The Appendix Orchestrates T-Cell Mediated Immunosurveillance in Colitis-Associated Cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although appendectomy may reduce colorectal inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), this surgical procedure has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of colitis-associated cancer (CAC). Our aim was to explore the mechanism underlying the appendectomy-associated increased risk of CAC. METHODS: Five-week-old male BALB/c mice underwent appendectomy, appendicitis induction, or sham laparotomy. They were then exposed to azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate (AOM/DSS) to induce CAC. Mice were killed 12 weeks later, and colons were taken for pathological analysis and immunohistochemistry (CD3 and CD8 staining). Human colonic tumors from 21 patients with UC who underwent surgical resection for CAC were immunophenotyped and stratified according to appendectomy status. RESULTS: Whereas appendectomy significantly reduced colitis severity and increased CAC number, appendicitis induction without appendectomy led to opposite results. Intratumor CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities were lower after appendectomy and higher after appendicitis induction compared with the sham laparotomy group. Blocking lymphocyte trafficking to the colon with the anti-α4ß7 integrin antibody or a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonist suppressed the inducing effect of the appendectomy on tumors' number and on CD3+/CD8+ intratumoral density. CD8+ or CD3+ T cells isolated from inflammatory neo-appendix and intravenously injected into AOM/DSS-treated recipient mice increased CD3+/CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltration and decreased tumor number. In UC patients with a history of appendectomy, intratumor CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities were decreased compared with UC patients without history of appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In UC, appendectomy could suppress a major site of T-cell priming, resulting in a less efficient CAC immunosurveillance.

Screening for spondyloarthritis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) can be associated with various musculoskeletal (IBD-MSK) manifestations that could be difficult to classify for gastroenterologists. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with IBD-MSK and the prevalence of spondyloarthritis (SpA). In this observational cross-sectional study, we included patients with IBD-MSK complaints (peripheral or back pain). All patients underwent a standardized rheumatology evaluation including clinical, biological and imaging evaluations (MRI of spine and sacroiliac joints and ultrasonography of enthesis). We included 183 IBD patients (60.7% women; median [interquartile range] age 45 [36-56] years); 159 (87%) had joint pain. In 43 (23.5%) and 25/175 (14.3%) patients, enthesis abnormalities were found on ultrasonography and sacroiliitis on MRI, respectively. SpA was diagnosed in 54 (29.5%) patients. IBD-related arthralgia and degenerative spine disease were diagnosed in 105 (57.4%) and 72 (39.3%) patients. Sixteen (29.6%) SpA patients initiated a new conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). A biologic DMARD was initiated in 10 patients or changed in 3. More than half of IBD-MSK patients had IBD-related arthralgia, and about one-third had definite SpA. Ultrasonography of enthesis and systematic MRI of sacroiliac joints seem useful for SpA classification and differential diagnosis in these patients who often have musculoskeletal pain complaints. Therapeutics were changed in most patients, which highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach for managing IBD with extra-intestinal symptoms.

Crohn-like Disease Affecting Small Bowel Due to Monogenic SLCO2A1 Mutations: First Cases of Chronic Enteropathy Associated with SLCO2A1 Gene [CEAS] in France.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple chronic ulcers of small intestine are mainly ascribed to Crohn's disease. Among possible differential diagnoses are chronic ulcers of small bowel caused by abnormal activation of the prostaglandin pathway either in the archetypal but uncommon non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID]-induced enteropathy, or in rare monogenic disorders due to PLA2G4A and SLCO2A1 mutations. SLCO2A1 variants are responsible for CEAS [chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1], a syndrome which was exclusively reported in patients of Asian origin. Herein, we report the case of two French female siblings, P1 and P2, with CEAS. CASE REPORT: P1 underwent iterative bowel resections [removing 1 m of small bowel in total] for recurrent strictures and perforations. Her sister P2 had a tight duodenal stricture which required partial duodenectomy. Next-generation sequencing was performed on P1's DNA and identified two compound heterozygous variants in exon 12 in SLCO2A1, which were also present in P2. CONCLUSION: CEAS can be detected within the European population and raises the question of its incidence and recognition outside Asia. Presence of intractable recurrent ulcerations of the small intestine, mimicking Crohn's disease with concentric strictures, should motivate a genetic search for SLCO2A1 mutations, particularly in the context of family history or consanguinity.

Role of adherent and invasive Escherichia coli in Crohn's disease: lessons from the postoperative recurrence model.

OBJECTIVE: We used the postoperative recurrence model to better understand the role of adherent and invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) bacteria in Crohn's disease (CD), taking advantage of a well-characterised postoperative cohort. DESIGN: From a prospective, multicentre cohort of operated patients with CD, AIEC identification was performed within the surgical specimen (M0) (N=181 patients) and the neoterminal ileum (n=119 patients/181) during colonoscopy performed 6 months after surgery (M6). Endoscopic postoperative recurrence was graded using Rutgeerts' index. The mucosa-associated microbiota was analysed by 16S sequencing at M0 and M6. Relative risks or ORs were adjusted on potential confounders. RESULTS: AIEC prevalence was twofold higher within the neoterminal ileum at M6 (30.3%) than within the surgical specimen (14.9%) (p<0.001). AIEC within the neoterminal ileum at M6 was associated with higher rate of early ileal lesions (i1) (41.6% vs 17.1%; aRR 3.49 (95% CI 1.01 to 12.04), p=0.048) or ileal lesions (i2b+i3) (38.2% vs 17.1%; aRR 3.45 (95% CI 1.06 to 11.30), p=0.040) compared with no lesion (i0). AIEC within the surgical specimen was predictive of higher risk of i2b-endoscopic postoperative recurrence (POR) (aOR 2.54 (95% CI 1.01 to 6.44), p=0.049) and severe endoscopic POR (aOR 3.36 (95% CI 1.25 to 9.06), p=0.017). While only 5.0% (6/119) of the patients were AIEC-positive at both M0 and M6, 43.7% (52/119), patients with history of positive test for AIEC (M0 or M6) had higher risk of ileal endoscopic POR (aOR 2.32 (95% CI 1.01 to 5.39), p=0.048)), i2b-endoscopic postoperative recurrence (aOR 2.41 (95% CI 1.01 to 5.74); p=0.048) and severe endoscopic postoperative (aOR=3.84 (95% CI 1.32 to 11.18), p=0.013). AIEC colonisation was associated with a specific microbiota signature including increased abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus. CONCLUSION: Based on the postoperative recurrence model, our data support the idea that AIEC are involved in the early steps of ileal CD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03458195.

Intra-abdominal abscesses in CD - When to treat with biologics?

Management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease (CD) is challenging. After initial drainage and antibiotherapy treatment, surgery with delayed intestinal resection is often recommended but new data suggests efficacy of biotherapies in this context. This review aims to summarize new data regarding efficacy and safety of anti-TNF in the management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating CD. We performed a review of the literature on medical management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating CD. After effective drainage of abscess, treatment with anti-TNF can allow resolving of abscess. In some patients and at a specific timing, the use of biotherapies could avoid delayed surgery and long-term abscess recurrence.