RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delays in reperfusion treatment, both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT), adversely affect outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To alleviate these delays, it is essential to comprehend how patients' baseline and stroke characteristics impact in-hospital reperfusion delays. While demographic and socioeconomic factors affect stroke outcomes, their impact on in-hospital delays remains unclear. METHOD: This is retrospective analysis at a tertiary stroke center, encompassing AIS patients receiving IVT and / or EVT between 2019 and 2022 (re-canalization cohort). Outcomes of interest were time intervals of admission to CT and admission to recanalization. Univariable analyses explored age, gender, baseline functional status, socioeconomic status (SES), ethnicity, vascular risk factors, and stroke characteristics. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Altogether, 313 patients treated with IVT and 293 with EVT were included in the re-canalization cohort. No demographic variables were found to be associated with stroke treatment time intervals. Following multivariable analysis, stroke severity (low NIHSS, p < 0.01), arrival to the hospital by other means than ambulance (p < 0.01), and atypical stroke symptoms (p < 0.01), were associated with in-hospital delays, both in the EVT and the IVT groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with a more severe ischemic stroke, typical stroke symptoms, and arrival by ambulance have shorter stroke treatment time intervals. These results emphasize that, in atypical cases, even a lower suspicion of stroke should promote urgent workup for stroke diagnosis. Our findings do not indicate any influence of demographic or SES on in-hospital reperfusion delays.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with dementia are underrepresented in interventional studies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This research gap creates a bias against their treatment in clinical practice. Our goal was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous-thrombolysis (t-PA) and endovascular treatment (EVT) in individuals with or without pre-AIS dementia. METHOD: A retrospective study of AIS patients receiving t-PA or EVT between 2019 and 2022. Patients were classified as dementia on a case-by-case review of baseline assessment. Additional variables included demographic, vascular risk factors, AIS severity and treatment. Outcomes of interest were intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality in 90-days, and the difference in modified rankin scale (mRS) before AIS and in 90-days follow-up. Outcomes were compared across non-matched groups and following propensity-score matching. RESULTS: Altogether, 628 patients were included, of which 68 had pre-AIS dementia. Compared to non-dementia group, dementia group were older, had a higher rate of vascular risk factors, higher pre-stroke mRS and higher baseline NIHSS. Individuals with dementia had higher rates of mortality (25% vs.11%,p < 0.01) on non-matched comparison. All cohort and restricted t-PA EVT matched analysis showed no difference in any outcome. Regression analysis confirmed that AIS severity at presentation and its treatment, not dementia, were the chief contributors to patients' outcomes. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that pre-AIS dementia does not impact the efficacy or safety of EVT or t-PA for AIS. We thus call for more inclusive research on stroke therapy with regards to baseline cognitive status. Such studies are urgently required to inform stroke guidelines and enhance care.
