Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery in Patients with the Metabolically Healthy Obese Phenotype.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery in metabolically healthy obese (MHO) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent bariatric surgery at a tertiary care hospital between January 2007 and March 2015. Patients who underwent revisional surgery and patients with type 1 diabetes were excluded from the analysis. MHO patients were defined as those without a previous diagnosis of diabetes or atherogenic dyslipidemia and absence of hypoglycemic treatment or treatment with fibrates. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included (mean age 48.97 ± 10.32 years, 68.6% of women). Sleeve gastrectomy was performed in 121 patients (64%) and a gastric bypass in 67 patients (36%). Prior to surgery, 36 patients (19%) were MHO. In the second- and third-year post-surgery, MHO patients presented a higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) (35.16% vs. 30.34%; p = 0.02 and 33.97% vs. 27.78%; p = 0.013 respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that MHO was associated with a higher weight loss irrespective of age, sex, baseline BMI, and type of surgery. We did not detect any differences in acute complications between patients with and without MHO after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in MHO patients in our study was associated with higher weight loss than that in MUHO patients. There were no differences between the two groups in respect to acute complications following surgery.

New Metrics to Assess Type 2 Diabetes After Bariatric Surgery: The "Time-Within-Remission Range".

Almost one third of patients do not achieve type 2 diabetes remission after bariatric surgery or are unable to sustain this effect long term. Our objective was to delve further into the dynamic responses of diabetes after bariatric surgery and to evaluate the "time-within-remission range" as a variable of metabolic control. A descriptive cohort study was done using a computerised multicentre and multidisciplinary registry. All data were adjusted by propensity score. A total of 1186 subjects with a follow-up of 4.5 ± 2.5 years were included. Type of surgery, diabetes remission, recurrence of diabetes, "time-within-remission range" and key predictors of diabetes outcomes were assessed. All patients (70% women, 51.4 ± 9.2 years old, body mass index (BMI) 46.3 ± 6.9 kg/m2) underwent primary bariatric procedures. "Time-within-remission range" were 83.3% (33.3-91.6) after gastric bypass, 68.7% (7.1-87.5) after sleeve gastrectomy and 90% (83.3-92.8) after malabsorptive techniques (p < 0.001 for all). Duration of diabetes, baseline HbA1c and insulin treatment were significantly negatively correlated with the "time-within-remission range". The association of bariatric techniques with "time-within-remission range", using gastric bypass as a reference, were: odds ratio (OR) 3.70 (2.34-5.84), p < 0.001 for malabsorptive techniques and OR 0.55 (0.40-0.75), p < 0.001 for sleeve gastrectomy. Characteristics of type 2 diabetes powerfully influence the outcomes of bariatric surgery. The "time-within-remission range" unveils a superiority of gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy.

Determinants of medication adherence among chronic patients from an urban area: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is a complex area of behaviour. Little is known about what influences chronic patients to take their medicines. This study has aimed to compare and contrast the health-related beliefs, experiences and types of behaviour typical among patients who have at least one chronic condition and are following a pharmacological treatment in accordance with their level of medication adherence. METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study, consisting of socio-demographic data, the 4-item Morisky-Green scale and 37 statements about health beliefs, perceptions and experiences, was conducted at different levels of healthcare (primary and tertiary settings). RESULTS: A total of 577 questionnaires were analyzed. Respondents had a mean age of 64 and took an average of 4.6 drugs. Optimal adherence was reported by 58.6% of respondents. Bivariate analysis showed adherent subjects were older, took more medications, were in better spirits and had greater confidence and information regarding their treatment. Multivariate analysis found older age and the statements 'My doctor periodically reviews my treatment' and 'I am motivated to continue with the treatment' to be significantly related to medication adherence, while 'I make variations when taking medication depending on how I feel' was significant for medication non-adherence. CONCLUSION: Medication non-adherence is common among chronic patients. Patient-centred approaches should be implemented in daily clinical practice as patient health beliefs, experiences and conduct influence medication-taking. Motivational interviewing might improve medication adherence in permitting emotional state managing and increasing educational skills, patient motivation and confidence between patients and healthcare providers.

Patients' Perspective of Medication Adherence in Chronic Conditions: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: About 50% of patients do not take their long-term therapy for chronic conditions as prescribed. Many studies have centered on patients' adherence to a specific treatment or single conditions, but few have taken all chronic conditions into consideration from a patient's perspective. This study aims to explore factors that impact on drug compliance and to identify strategies to improve this from the perspective of patients with at least one chronic condition. METHODS: Patients were recruited by healthcare professionals from a hospital pharmacy, four community pharmacies, patient associations, and a primary care center in Barcelona. Five focus groups were conducted (N = 36). Conversations were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim to allow qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Study subjects were aged 39-90 years (mean 65 years) and the mean number of comorbidities per patient was 2.3 (range 1-7). The main modifiers of therapeutic conduct were: patients' health beliefs, patient-prescriber relationships, and patients' motivation and perception of illness control. Study participants wanted greater participation in decision-making concerning their health and increased education about their illness and medication. They also wanted individualized healthcare that took their preferences and personal and emotional issues into account. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight how the patient-prescriber's relationship and factors such as health beliefs, motivation and perception of illness control impact on medication adherence in chronic patients. Future interventions to optimize adherence to treatment should focus on shared decision-making and more extensive health education. FUNDING: Celgene Corporation.

Prevalence and detection of neuropsychiatric adverse effects during hepatitis C treatment.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment combinations for chronic hepatitis C virus infection still include pegylated interferon and ribavirin despite the new therapeutic options available. Interferon-based treatments are associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. Central nervous system events are among the most frequent adverse drug reactions and their influence on treatment adherence and effectiveness is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate neuropsychiatric adverse effects of interferon-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C in standard multidisciplinary clinical practice. Risk factors for these adverse effects and their impact on adherence and sustained viral response were also evaluated. Setting Ambulatory care pharmacy in coordination with the liver unit and the infectious diseases unit at a 650-bed tertiary university hospital. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C who completed treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin between 2005 and 2013. All patients underwent a multidisciplinary follow-up during treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neuropsychiatric adverse effects were evaluated in relation to severity, management and outcome. The presence of anxiety and depression was evaluated by means of specific tests. RESULTS: A total of 717 treatments in 679 patients were included. During treatment, we detected 1679 neuropsychiatric adverse effects in 618 patients (86.2 %), generating 1737 clinical interventions. Fifty-seven (3.3 %) neuropsychiatric adverse effects were severe and 2 (0.1 %) were life-threatening (suicidal attempts). Most neuropsychiatric adverse effects (1555 events, 92.6 %) resolved without sequelae. Psychiatric medication was required in 289 patients (40.3 %). Sustained viral response was achieved in 400 cases (55.8 %) and was associated with adherence (OR = 1.942, 95 % CI = 1.235-3.052, p = 0.004). A multivariate analysis did not show any relationship between neuropsychiatric adverse effects and treatment adherence or sustained viral response. A psychiatric history was a strong risk factor for depression, anxiety and other psychiatric disorders during treatment. CONCLUSION: Neuropsychiatric adverse effects during interferon-based treatments in patients with chronic hepatitis C were common but mostly mild or moderate. Early detection and accurate multidisciplinary management avoided treatment discontinuation, ensuring adherence and attaining sustained viral response. The identified risk factors could be used to determine patients eligible for interferon-free combinations, thus optimizing health system economics.

Drug-related visits to the emergency department in a Spanish university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Negative outcomes of medications (NOMs) are a major public health problem that impact on patients' quality of life. As many NOMs are avoidable, it is necessary to determine their causes in each health setting in order to plan preventive strategies. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess the frequency, type, severity, and preventability of NOMs that result in emergency department visits, to identify the main medications involved, and to determine factors associated with their development in a general hospital in Spain. SETTING: Emergency department of a 650-bed university tertiary hospital. METHODS: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. On each study day, a pharmacist administered a questionnaire to one in every three patients awaiting consultation. Information was also obtained from the emergency medical records. Emergency department visits were identified as NOMs on the basis of assessment by a pharmacist and a physician. A second pharmacist and physician reassessed the same cases. Discrepancies were adjudicated by an external team of two pharmacists and a physician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of NOMs detected, severity and preventability of the NOMs detected, medications involved in these NOMs, and factors associated with NOMs. RESULTS: A NOM was detected in 221 of 588 patients analyzed (37.6 %). In relation to NOM severity, 59.3 % were mild, 34.4 % were moderate and 6.3 % were severe. One hundred and fifty-seven of the 221 NOMs (71 %) were considered preventable. Drugs most frequently involved in NOMs were nervous system agents (22.1 %), musculo-skeletal system agents (19.1 %), and anti-infective agents for systemic use (17.6 %). Mean number of drugs taken was the only factor associated with NOMs. CONCLUSION: The high number of NOMs detected indicates that closer pharmacotherapy follow up is needed to avoid such events in our setting.

Ritonavir boosting dose reduction from 100 to 50 mg does not change the atazanavir steady-state exposure in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and safety of 300 mg of atazanavir boosted with 100 or 50 mg of ritonavir, both once daily, at steady state. METHODS: This was a single-blind, multiple-dose, crossover, sequence-randomized trial. Thirteen healthy HIV-1-negative men received witnessed once-daily doses of atazanavir (300 mg) and 100 or 50 mg of ritonavir for 10 days (15 day washout). Atazanavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations were determined for 24 h on day 10. Log-transformed individual pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between treatments (analysis of variance); the difference between treatments on the log scale and 95% CIs were calculated. Fasting cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose and bilirubin plasma levels were measured at the beginning and end of each period and compared (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Gastrointestinal symptoms and other events were recorded. RESULTS: Ritonavir C(max) and the AUC0₋24 were lower after the 50 mg booster dose than after 100 mg [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (95% CI), 0.40 (0.31-0.51) and 0.35 (0.29-0.42), respectively]. No differences were observed in atazanavir exposure with 50 or 100 mg of ritonavir [GMR C(max) (95% CI), 1.00 (0.79-1.28); GMR AUC0₋24 (95% CI), 0.98 (0.79-1.21)]. Atazanavir trough concentration was >0.15 mg/L in all volunteers. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased 0.40 mM (P = 0.01) and 0.37 mM (P = 0.003) from their corresponding baseline value during the 100 mg dosing period; there were no significant changes on 50 mg. Mild increases in bilirubin were detected on day 10 after both treatments without differences between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of higher exposure to ritonavir with 100 mg, atazanavir exposure was equivalent; the lipid profile was better under the lower booster dose (50 mg).

Negative clinical outcomes associated with drug-related problems in heart failure (HF) outpatients: impact of a pharmacist in a multidisciplinary HF clinic.

BACKGROUND: Drug-related negative outcomes (DNOs) are health problems that patients experience due to drug use or nonuse. Heart failure (HF) patients are at high risk of experiencing DNOs owing to polypharmacy, comorbidities, and age. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-seven consecutive HF patients were enrolled and followed for 6 months. A pharmacist, integrated within a multidisciplinary HF team, reviewed the medication of each patient to detect, resolve, and/or prevent possible DNOs, risks of developing a DNO (rDNOs) and the drug-related problems (DRPs) that are associated with them. We detected 147 DNOs/rDNOs with a mean of 1.5 ± 1.4 per patient. Among DNOs, 45% were due to a lack of a pharmacologic treatment (need for a drug) and 24% were treatments with an insufficient drug dose (quantitative ineffectiveness). Among rDNOs, 33% were due to use of an unsafe drug (nonquantitative lack of safety) and 30% to quantitative ineffectiveness. Ninety-four percent of DNOs/rDNOs were preventable, and, importantly, 5.5% were classified as clinically serious. During follow-up, pharmacist interventions solved or prevented the health problem in 83% of cases. The most frequently identified DRPs were "insufficiently treated health problem" (31%), "inadequate dose, regimen, or duration of a drug" (22%), "probability of adverse effects" (16%), and "nonadherence" (14%). A significant relationship between the number of DNOs/rDNOs and the number of drugs was found (P < .013). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic HF outpatients have a high incidence of preventable DNOs. The inclusion of a pharmacist in multidisciplinary HF teams should be considered, because it is clinically beneficial for patients and it increases HF specialists' awareness of DNOs, especially those beyond HF.

Seguimiento farmacoterapéutico y dispensación activa: diferencias y similitudes / Drug therapy follow up and active dispensing. Differences and similitudes

La publicación del Consenso sabre Atención Farmacéutica ha aclarado los términos Dispensación Activa, Indicación Farmacéutica y Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico, describiéndolos como los servicios fundamentales dentro de la Atención Farmacéutica. Al tratar de llevar a la practica las lineas generales que aparecen en ese Consenso, se pueden estar cometiendo errores por falta de desarrollo conceptual, frecuentemente en relación al concepto de problemas relacionados con medicamentos (PRM). El objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar las diferencias existentes entre dos de los tres servicios citados: Seguimiento y Dispensación, basándose en las diferencias existentes entre los conceptos de proceso y resultados del paradigma SPO (structure-precess-outcomes) (AU)

Publishing of the Consensus on Pharmaceutical Care has clarified the terms Active Dispensing, Pharmacist Consultation, and Drug Therapy Follow-up, being described as the fundamental services within that Pharmaceutical Care. On treating to put into practice the general guidelines established on this Consensus, some errors due to the lack of conceptual development, frequently related to the concept of drug-related problems (DRP) may appear. The aim of the present study is to analyze differences existing between two of the three mentioned services: Follow-up and Dispensing, being supported by the differences existing between the concepts of process and outcomes resulting from the SPO (structure-process-outcomes) paradigm (AU)