P-glycoprotein-mediated in vitro biliary excretion in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes.

Recently, sandwich-cultured (SC) rat hepatocytes have been used as an in vitro model to assess biliary excretion of drugs and xenobiotics. The purpose of the present study was to validate the use of SC rat hepatocytes for the in vitro assessment of P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated biliary drug excretion. The specific and fluorescent P-gp substrate rhodamine 123 (Rh123) and the P-gp substrate digoxin were selected as model compounds. Rh123 and digoxin accumulation and Rh123 efflux under standard and Ca(2+)-free conditions were quantified in SC rat hepatocytes to determine substrate secretion into canalicular networks in vitro. The major role of P-gp in the biliary excretion of these compounds was confirmed by inhibition experiments with the potent P-gp inhibitor GF120918. Hepatocyte culture conditions, including media type and time in culture, significantly affected Rh123 biliary excretion. P-gp expression, as assessed by Western blot, was increased with culture time. Dexamethasone (an in vivo inducer of P-gp) concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 1 microM in the cell culture medium did not influence P-gp expression or Rh123 biliary excretion. Rh123 and digoxin biliary clearance values, predicted from SC rat hepatocyte data, were consistent with values reported in vivo and in isolated perfused rat liver studies. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate the utility of SC rat hepatocytes as an in vitro model to study and predict the biliary excretion of P-gp substrates.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in healthy young (18-45 years) men and women, and healthy elderly (> or = 65 years) men and women. METHODS: Eight young men, 11 young women, 8 elderly men and 8 elderly women were given oral ziprasidone 40 mg day(-1), in two evenly divided daily doses, for 7 days, followed by a single 20 mg dose on day 8. Serum samples were collected immediately before the morning dose on days 1-8, for up to 12 h after dosing on day 1 and for up to 96 h after dosing on day 8. The resulting data were used to derive pharmacokinetic parameters of ziprasidone in each age and gender group. RESULTS: Steady-state serum concentrations of ziprasidone were achieved within 2-3 days. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone, determined 8 days after the initiation of treatment, were similar in the young men, elderly men and young women. Assessment of gender effects by analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in Cmax (85 vs. 69 ng ml(-1) and tmax (3.19 vs. 4.81 h) but no differences in AUC(0,12 h) or lambda(z). Assessment of age effects by analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in AUC(0,12 h) (560 vs. 465 ng ml(-1) h), Cmax (85 vs. 69 ng ml(-1) and lambda(z) (0.126 vs. 0.197 l h(-1) but no difference in tmax. Assessment of age and gender effects by analysis of covariance, with body weight as the covariate, did not reveal any significant differences. The mean t(1/2), z in the young men, young women, elderly men and elderly women were 3.1, 4.1, 5.7 and 5.3 h, respectively. Standard deviations of the means for the pharmacokinetic parameters for the elderly women tended to be large. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone is not clinically significant.

The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in subjects with normal and impaired hepatic function.

AIMS: To assess whether hepatic impairment influences the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone. METHODS: Thirty subjects with normal hepatic function or a primary diagnosis of clinically significant cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A or B) were enrolled into an open-label, multicentre, multiple-dose study. The subjects with chronic, stable hepatic impairment and the matched control subjects received ziprasidone 40 mg day(-1), given orally with food, as two divided daily doses for 4 days and a single 20 mg dose on the morning of day 5. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined from multiple venous blood samples collected on days 1 and 5. Liver function was evaluated quantitatively using antipyrine. RESULTS: On day 1 there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics (AUC(0,12 h), Cmax, tmax) of ziprasidone between the two groups. On day 5 there were no statistically significant differences in the Cmax or tmax for ziprasidone between the two groups. The mean AUC(0,12 h) for ziprasidone was statistically significantly greater in the hepatically impaired subjects compared with the normal subjects (590 ng ml(-1) h vs. 467 ng ml(-1) h, P = 0. 042). However, the AUC(0,12 h) increased by only 26% in the cirrhotic group compared with the matched control group. The ziprasidone lambda(z) in the subjects with normal hepatic function was statistically significantly greater than that in the hepatically impaired subjects (P<0.001). There was no correlation between antipyrine lambda(z) and ziprasidone lambda(z) in the subjects with normal hepatic function or in those with hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that mild to moderate hepatic impairment does not result in clinically significant alteration of ziprasidone pharmacokinetics.

The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.

AIMS: To assess whether renal impairment influences the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone, and to determine whether ziprasidone is cleared via haemodialysis. METHODS: Thirty-nine subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment were enrolled into an open-label, multicentre, multiple-dose study and assigned to four groups according to their renal function: normal (group 1, creatinine clearance > 70 ml min(-1); mildly impaired (group 2, creatinine clearance 30-60 ml min(-1); moderately impaired (group 3, creatinine clearance 10-29 ml min(-1), and severely impaired (group 4, requiring haemodialysis three times-a-week). Subjects received ziprasidone 40 mg day(-1), given orally with food, as two divided daily doses for 7 days and a single 20 mg dose on the morning of day 8. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined from multiple venous blood samples collected on days 1 and 8 (haemodialysis day for subjects with severe renal impairment). Additional samples were collected from subjects with severe renal impairment on day 7 (nonhaemodialysis day). RESULTS: On day 1 there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics (AUC(0, 12 h), Cmax, tmax) of ziprasidone among subjects with normal renal function and those with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment. The AUC(0,12 h) and Cmax in subjects with mildly impaired renal function were statistically significantly greater than in those with moderately impaired renal function (P = 0.0163-0.0385). The mean AUC(0,12 h) was 272, 370, 250 and 297 ng ml(-1) h in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Corresponding mean Cmax values were 47, 61, 41 and 50 ng ml(-1) and corresponding mean tmax values were 5, 6, 5 and 5 h. On day 8 there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics (AUC(0,12 h), Cmax, tmax, lambda(z), Fb) of ziprasidone among subjects with normal renal function and those with moderate or severe renal impairment. The AUC(0,12 h) in subjects with mild renal impairment was statistically significantly greater than those in the other three groups (P = 0.0025-0.0221), but this was not considered clinically significant. The mean AUC(0,12 h) were 446, 650, 389 and 427 ng ml(-1) h in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Corresponding mean Cmax values were 68, 93, 54 and 70 ng ml(-1), corresponding mean tmax values were 4, 5, 4 and 5 h and corresponding mean lambda(z) were 0.14, 0.11, 0.14 and 0.17 h(-1). The mean percentage Fb was 99.84-99.88% across all groups and the mean t(1/2),z ranged from 4.2 to 6.4 h. Comparison of the mean AUC(0,12 h) and Cmax values in subjects with severe renal impairment on day 7 with those on day 8 suggested that haemodialysis does not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that mild-to-moderate impairment of renal function does not result in clinically significant alteration of ziprasidone pharmacokinetics and therefore does not necessitate dose adjustment.