High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.

Are more antiemetic trials with a placebo necessary? Report of patient data from randomized trials of placebo antiemetics with cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Because of the predictability of significant emesis after its use, cisplatin serves as the standard emetic stimulus for trials of antiemetic drugs. To define better the incidence, severity, and pattern of emesis that follows cisplatin, facilitate the testing of new agents, and obviate the need for further placebo-controlled trials for this indication, individual patient data were compiled from completed studies with placebo antiemetics and cisplatin. METHODS: The time and number of emetic episodes during the 24 hours after cisplatin were obtained for 48 patients given a placebo antiemetic. Each was treated as part of a randomized, double-blind trial reported between 1981 and 1990. Emesis after antiemetic "rescue" therapy was also assessed. RESULTS: Emesis occurred in 47 of 48 patients (98% observed rate, 95% confidence interval, 89-99%). The median number of emetic episodes during the 24 hours after cisplatin was 6. Emesis continued after rescue in 77% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin caused severe emesis that persisted despite rescue in placebo-treated patients. Using the data presented, any therapy preventing acute emesis in 8 or more of the 48 individuals receiving cisplatin > 50 mg/m2 was an active antiemetic (P = 0.05). The four trials discussed here documented the antiemetic effectiveness of granisetron, metoclopramide, and ondansetron. The placebo-treated patients studied can serve as a control group for testing new therapies. Because of the certainty of severe emesis after cisplatin, and the availability both of these data and several proven drugs for this condition, prospective comparisons of antiemetics should employ active control medications.

Oral combination antiemetics in patients with small cell lung cancer receiving cisplatin or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous antiemetic combinations containing a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (like metoclopramide, ondansetron, or granisetron) with dexamethasone have become the standard therapy for the treatment of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Intravenous antiemetics, however, can be more costly and take more time to prepare and deliver, and therefore are not preferred for home, outpatient, or office use. The objective of this study was to determine the antiemetic activity and safety of the oral combination antiemetic regimen of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine in patients with small cell lung cancer receiving standard outpatient chemotherapy programs. METHODS: Fifty-two patients receiving initial cisplatin (60 mg/m2) or cyclophosphamide (600-1500 mg/m2) plus doxorubicin (30-45 mg/m2) received an oral regimen of metoclopramide (3 mg/kg x 2 then 2 mg/kg x 2 or 4 doses), dexamethasone (20 mg) and diphenhydramine (50 mg x 2 or 3 doses) (oral MDD), beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. RESULTS: Vomiting was prevented in 15 of 21 (76%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%-92%) receiving cisplatin and 21 of 31 (71%) individuals (95% CI, 52%-86%) given cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin. Adverse effects were mild and transient and included sedation, loose stools, akathisia, and hiccoughs. CONCLUSIONS: The oral MDD antiemetic regimen prevented acute emesis in 73% of the patients entered and was well tolerated in this population of patients with small cell lung cancer.

Randomized phase II trial comparing two versus three doses of ondansetron when used in combination with dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2.

Ondansetron controls cisplatin-induced emesis when given in three 0.15 mg/kg doses, and preliminary data suggest that control may be maintained when fewer doses are employed. Prior trials have further shown improved antiemetic effects and fewer adverse effects of cisplatin treatment when neurotransmitter receptor blockers are combined with dexamethasone. This trial was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron and to see if equivalent results could be obtained with only two doses of ondansetron. There were 44 patients receiving initial cisplatin at a dose > or = 100 mg/m2, each given dexamethasone 20 mg and randomized to receive either two or three 0.15 mg/kg doses of ondansetron. Vomiting prevention was identical (35%) whether two or three doses were given. No new adverse effects were noted and cisplatin-induced diarrhea, usually seen in up to 60% of patients given this dose of cisplatin, was noted in only 5%. Although this trial did not demonstrate enhanced antiemetic effects with the combination, other investigators have done so and all agree that the regimen is safe and reduces adverse effects. Further exploration and use of the combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone, and studies testing fewer doses of ondansetron in this regimen are warranted.

Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

PURPOSE: This dose-ranging trial of intravenous dolasetron mesylate (MDL73,147EF) was performed to determine its adverse and antiemetic effects in patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients treated with initial cisplatin received a single intravenous dose of dolasetron mesylate administered over 20 minutes beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. The following four dose levels were studied: 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 5.0 mg/kg. Emesis and adverse effects were measured for 24 hours after cisplatin. RESULTS: All adverse effects were mild and transient including loose stools, headache, serum AST/ALT elevations, and asymptomatic prolongation of ECG intervals. Among the dose levels, no-emesis rates from 24% to 52% were observed, and the percentage of patients having zero, one, or two emetic episodes ranged from 48% to 82%. Complete control of vomiting increased as the dose was escalated to 2.4 mg/kg, but did not improve further with higher doses. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron mesylate can be administered safely at doses up to 5.0 mg/kg, with comparable complete protection rates and increased adverse effects at doses greater than 2.4 mg/kg. Antiemetic activity was seen after cisplatin. Trials comparing single infusions of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron are under way.

The addition of ondansetron to the combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam did not improve vomiting prevention in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin has been shown to be an important mediator of chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Ondansetron is a potent and highly specific antagonist of the 5-HT3 serotonin receptor. The objective of the current trial was to determine if the addition of ondansetron to the combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam (MDL) could improve the control of vomiting in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. The three-drug MDL antiemetic regimen has been shown to prevent vomiting in 67% of patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. METHODS: Thirty-two patients receiving initial cisplatin (greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2) were given intravenous lorazepam, 1.5 mg/m2 (maximum dose, 3 mg), one dose 45 minutes before cisplatin; metoclopramide, 3 mg/kg 40 minutes before and 90 minutes after cisplatin; ondansetron, 0.3 mg/kg 25 minutes before and 3.5 hours after cisplatin; and dexamethasone, 20 mg, one dose 10 minutes before cisplatin. Patients were followed for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: Vomiting was prevented in 67% of patients (95% confidence interval, 47-83%). Adverse effects were mild and transient and included sedation, headache, serum aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase elevations, akathisia, and hiccups. CONCLUSIONS: Vomiting was prevented in two thirds of patients treated with MDL plus ondansetron, a result similar to that observed in earlier trials of MDL alone. The lack of improvement in emetic control by the addition of ondansetron suggests that vomiting mediated through 5-HT3 receptors is already effectively blocked. Emesis that occurs despite pretreatment with MDL is likely mediated by other mechanisms.

Enhancing the effectiveness of the specific serotonin antagonists. Combination antiemetic therapy with dexamethasone.

Combinations of drugs have become standard therapy for the prevention of vomiting caused by anticancer drugs like cisplatin. Recently, a new class of antiemetic agents, the potent and specific 5-HT3 receptor antagonists such as ondansetron, granisetron, and tropisetron, have been shown to be more effective and better tolerated than metoclopramide. This report describes the rationale for combination antiemetic therapy, details the testing of metoclopramide-based regimens as a model for combination therapy development, reviews completed trials of ondansetron plus dexamethasone, and offers strategies to further alleviate vomiting during anticancer chemotherapy. The reported trials testing metoclopramide-based combinations were reviewed and that experience was applied to the ongoing studies of ondansetron when used with dexamethasone and other agents. Combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam prevented acute emesis caused by high-dose cisplatin in 63% of patients, lessened side effects, and were convenient enough to administer to outpatients. Completed trials of ondansetron and dexamethasone demonstrated improved vomiting control over ondansetron alone while using less cumbersome schedules. Attempts to improve ondansetron-based antiemetic regimens by developing optimal drug doses and schedules and adding adjuvant and different classes of antiemetic agents are now in clinical testing. Based on previous experience and current results, combinations of a specific serotonin agonist and dexamethasone are the best treatment for prevention of vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Future clinical research should aim to refine antiemetic regimens and improve emetic control through the use of new antiemetic and adjuvant agents.

Midazolam in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy and antiemetics.

Benzodiazepines lessen anxiety and improve comfort in cancer patients. Midazolam is an effective benzodiazepine with a rapid onset and short duration of action, properties that could permit its use in outpatient areas or in short but stressful situations. Two consecutive trials were undertaken to study midazolam as an adjunct in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy. Each studied midazolam given as a short infusion 30 min prior to chemotherapy at dose levels ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg. Trial I determined the safety, sedation, and dose of midazolam in patients receiving chemotherapy of low to moderate emetic potential. Twenty-two patients were entered. No significant respiratory depression or oxygen desaturation was observed. At the optimal dose level (0.04 mg/kg), sedation began a median of 3 min following administration and continued for a median of 38 min. Sixty-four percent of patients experienced mild sedation. Trial II studied the same doses of midazolam when used in combination with intravenous metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2. Nineteen patients were entered; 79% experienced mild sedation. At the 0.04-mg/kg dose level, sedation began a median of 18 min following administration and continued for a median of 170 min. Midazolam can be given safely to patients receiving chemotherapy with and without concomitant antiemetics. The predictability and duration of its sedative effects suggest it can be used in outpatients.

Dose-ranging antiemetic evaluation of the serotonin antagonist RG 12915 in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: RG 12915 is a potent, selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with a biologic half-life of 11-20 hours. RG 12915 prevents cisplatin-induced emesis in ferrets at doses of 0.03 mg/kg. Animal toxicology studies permitted safe testing in humans at doses of up to 2.0 mg/kg. This dose-ranging trial of intravenous RG 12915 was performed to determine the optimal dosage and adverse effects and to observe for antiemetic effects in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-six patients receiving chemotherapy likely to cause vomiting received a single intravenous dose of RG 12915 at a rate of 3 ml/minute beginning 60 minutes before chemotherapy. Four dose levels were explored: 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. All adverse effects were mild and transient and included discomfort at the infusion site, hyperglycemia, headache, serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) elevations, and sedation. Antiemetic efficacy was seen in patients receiving cisplatin at doses of greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: RG 12915 can be administered safely at the dose levels explored. Single intravenous doses of RG 12915 prevented or lessened emesis caused by chemotherapy, including cisplatin given at doses of greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2. RG 12915 warrants further testing. Of the doses tested, the 2.0 mg/kg dose is the most appropriate for further exploration.

Phase II trial of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2.

Ondansteron, a serotonin antagonist antiemetic, controls emesis caused by cisplatin when given as multiple 0.15 mg/kg dosages in a variety of administration schedules. This trial evaluated a single 0.45 mg/kg i.v. dose of ondansetron in 21 cancer patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2 as initial chemotherapy. Twenty-five percent of patients had no emetic episodes (95% confidence interval: 9-49%), and 45% had two or fewer emetic episodes (95% confidence interval: 23-69%). No significant adverse effects were seen. In prior trials at this institution in similarly treated patients, ondansetron given in three divided doses yielded a 42% no emesis rate. In this trial a single i.v. 0.45 mg/kg dose of ondansetron prevented emesis in 25% of patients receiving initial cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2. For this dose of cisplatin and ondansetron, the observed emesis complete control rate was lower than that previously seen using multiple dose schedules.

Dose-ranging evaluation of the substituted benzamide dazopride when used as an antiemetic in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy.

Dazopride, a substituted benzamide structurally related to metoclopramide, is a potent gastric prokinetic agent that prevents cisplatin-induced emesis in animals. Unlike metoclopramide, dazopride has no effect on dopamine receptors and therefore should not produce extrapyramidal side effects. In this dose-ranging trial, 23 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy known to produce nausea and vomiting received three i.v. infusions of dazopride every 2 h beginning 30 min before the chemotherapy. Seven dose levels were explored ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mg/kg in each of the three infusions. Toxicities were mild and included sedation, dizziness, visual disturbances, and headaches. All side effects were transient and were not dose-related. Antiemetic effects were observed. Dazopride can be safely given on this schedule at doses of up to 4.0 mg/kg to patients receiving chemotherapy. On the basis of the results of this trial, further studies of this agent are warranted.

Dose-ranging antiemetic evaluation of the serotonin antagonist tropisetron in patients receiving anti-cancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Tropisetron (ICS 205-930) antagonizes the serotonin type 3 receptor and has antiemetic activity in animals given cisplatin. Its mean serum half-life in 11.1 hours. METHODS: In this dose-ranging trial, 22 patients undergoing anti-cancer chemotherapy received 24 courses of a single intravenous infusion of tropisetron beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Four dose levels were explored (range, 12-48 mg/m2). RESULTS: Toxicities were mild and included headache, transient elevations of serum alanine transaminase and/or aspartate transaminase levels, and sedation. No akathisia or acute dystonic reactions were observed. Thirty-six percent of patients had no emesis, and 58% had two or fewer emetic episodes. Ten patients received high-dose cisplatin (dose, > or = 100 mg/m2) as initial chemotherapy. Of these, 30% had no emesis, and 60% had two or fewer episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Tropisetron can be administered safely in the doses tested with no dose-limiting toxicities. The encouraging antiemetic efficacy, mild toxicities, lack of extrapyramidal effects, and convenience of a single 15-minute infusion regimen make this drug appropriate for study in additional trials.

Oral ondansetron for the control of delayed emesis after cisplatin. Report of a phase II study and a review of completed trials to manage delayed emesis.

BACKGROUND: Despite excellent control of vomiting during the initial 24 hours after chemotherapy with combination antiemetics, most patients who receive cisplatin at doses of 120 mg/m2 experience delayed emesis 24-120 hours after chemotherapy. METHODS: Twenty patients receiving cisplatin (greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2) as initial chemotherapy were entered into this Phase II trial to test the effectiveness of oral ondansetron, a specific serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist, in controlling delayed emesis. All patients received intravenous metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam for the control of acute emesis 0-24 hours after receiving cisplatin. They then received ondansetron 16 mg orally three times a day for 4 days. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of those who were treated with oral ondansetron had complete control of delayed emesis during the entire 4-day period (95% confidence interval, 3-38%). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: At the dose and schedule tested, oral ondansetron did not appear to control delayed emesis. Previous trials of programs to lessen this complication suggest that both metoclopramide and dexamethasone are effective in lessening delayed vomiting and that the combination of these drugs is more effective than placebo. Although in one trial ondansetron appeared to control delayed emesis in patients who received cisplatin at doses of 50-120 mg/m2, it was not superior to either placebo or metoclopramide in two randomized studies. Additional testing of the 5-HT3 antagonists, both alone and in combination, will be needed to establish their role in the management of this condition.

Methodology in anti-emetic trials.

Major progress in the ability to control chemotherapy-induced emesis has been made over the past 10 years. One of the several factors contributing to this improved control has been the development of accurate assessment methodology. The application of proper study methodology fostered the identification of active single agents and led to the formation of effective anti-emetic combinations. In this communication, important areas in anti-emetic study evaluation will be outlined. Proper methodology includes selection of agents or regimens that have a good rationale for study. Patient, chemotherapy, and anti-emetic factors must be controlled or standardised in good trial design, and the evaluation techniques for determining the amount of emesis or of nausea must be performed using reliable and valid methods. The statistical design employed and number of patients entered in the trial should be determined based on achievable and relevant goals.

Dose-ranging antiemetic trial of high-dose oral metoclopramide.

The present trial with high oral doses of metoclopramide was undertaken to (a) determine a well-tolerated dosage of oral metoclopramide; (b) measure the blood levels achieved with these oral doses; (c) determine the side effects of high doses; and (d) observe for antiemetic efficacy. Thirty-six patients receiving emesis-producing chemotherapy consisting primarily of high intravenous (i.v.) doses of cyclophosphamide plus adriamycin or cisplatin received 48 courses of oral metoclopramide. The metoclopramide dosage was escalated in six steps from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg and was given 1/2 h before chemotherapy, then 1 1/2, 3 1/2, 7 1/2, 11 1/2, and 15 1/2 after chemotherapy. Diphenhydramine (50 mg orally) was given with the first, third, and fifth dosages. Toxicity was generally mild, not dose related, and similar to that observed with the i.v. drug with the exception of an increased incidence of acute dystonic reactions. Antiemetic effects were observed at each dose level. In patients receiving oral metoclopramide doses of 2 or 3 mg/kg, all achieved serum levels greater than 1,000 ng/ml. High-dose oral metoclopramide was well tolerated and demonstrated antiemetic effects at the dose levels explored. We recommend 2-3 mg/kg oral metoclopramide doses with 50 mg diphenhydramine for use in future trials.

Antiemetic therapy: management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Physicians and nurses involved in the care of oncology patients share the responsibility for proper management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oncology nurses have taken an active part in the research and investigation of new antiemetic agents and the sharing of this knowledge with others. Identifying patient characteristics, using specific guidelines for antiemetic selection, and a knowledge of the antiemetic agents that are active singly or in combination can mean the difference between success and failure in preventing or controlling vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Proper dosing and scheduling of antiemetics using recommendations that have proved efficacious can further decrease a patient's discomfort during a most difficult time in his or her life.

Controlling delayed vomiting: double-blind, randomized trial comparing placebo, dexamethasone alone, and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin.

The majority of patients receiving cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 experience delayed nausea and vomiting occurring between 24 and 120 hours after chemotherapy administration. Ninety-one patients who were receiving cisplatin (120 mg/m2) as initial chemotherapy were entered into this double-blind trial. All patients received intravenous (IV) metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam for the control of acute emesis during the period from 0 to 24 hours after cisplatin. Patients were then randomized to one of three treatment regimens: placebo; oral dexamethasone, 8 mg twice daily for two days, then 4 mg twice daily for two days; or the combination of oral metoclopramide, 0.5 mg/kg four times daily for four days, plus oral dexamethasone administered as above. Forty-eight percent of individuals who received the two-drug combination of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone experienced delayed vomiting as opposed to 65% who were administered dexamethasone alone and 89% who received placebo (P = .006). Scores assessing the severity of delayed nausea and vomiting were consistently worse in individuals receiving placebo. The incidences of sleepiness, restlessness, heartburn, hiccoughs, loose bowel movements, insomnia, and acute dystonic reactions did not differ significantly among the three regimens and were mild and self-limited. The two-drug combination of oral metoclopramide plus dexamethasone is well tolerated, safe, and more effective than dexamethasone alone or placebo in controlling delayed vomiting following cisplatin.

Phase II trials of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F for the control of vomiting caused by cisplatin.

Three phase II studies of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F were conducted. In trial 1, 20 patients given initial chemotherapy with cisplatin at doses greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2 were randomized to receive three GR38032F doses (0.18 mg/kg) on an every-2-hour or every-4-hour schedule. In trial 2, eight similar patients were given three 0.04-mg/kg doses every 2 hours. In trial 3, 12 previously treated patients receiving cisplatin at 20-25 mg/m2 on 4 or 5 consecutive days each received three daily GR38032F doses (0.15 mg/kg) every 2 hours. In trial 1, 35% of the patients had no emesis [95% confidence interval (CI), 16%-58%] and 55% had one or two emetic episodes (95% CI, 32%-76%). Results were similar between the every-2-hour and every-4-hour schedules. In trial 2, only one of eight patients (13%) had no vomiting (95% CI, 1%-50%). In trial 3, in which previously treated patients were studied, complete control ranged from 75% on day 1 to 33% on day 3. Mild sedation, headache, and transient elevations of serum SGOT (AST) were observed. No extrapyramidal symptoms occurred. A dose of 0.15-0.18 mg/kg every 2 hours for three iv doses is recommended. Further comparison and combination studies of GR38032F are warranted.