RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of mortality in heart transplantation patients. Despite optimal immunosuppression therapy, the rate of CAV post-transplantation remains high. In this review, we gathered all recent studies as well as experimental evidence focusing on the prevention and treatment strategies regarding CAV after heart transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A complete literature survey was performed using the PubMed database search to gather available information regarding prevention and treatment strategies of CAV after heart transplantation. RESULTS: Several non-immune and immune factors have been linked to CAV such as ischemic reperfusion injury, metabolic disorders, cytomegalovirus infection, coronary endothelial dysfunction, injury and inflammation respectively. Serial coronary angiography combined with intravascular ultrasound is currently the method of choice for detecting early disease. Biomarkers and noninvasive imaging can also assist in the early identification of CAV. Treatment strategies such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors proceed to grow, but prevention remains the objective. CONCLUSIONS: Early detection is the key to therapy management. It enables early identification and diagnosis of patients with CAV, who would gain the most from prompt treatment. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the multifactorial pathophysiological process of CAV, develop detection methods and find treatments that prevent or slow disease progression.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/prevención & control , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Aloinjertos/irrigación sanguínea , Aloinjertos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Adrenomedullin (ADM) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are known to be associated with elevated left ventricular filling pressures. However, little is known about this association in hemodialysis (HD) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Our objective was to evaluate the potential association between E/e' ratio and plasma levels of BNP and ADM in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with preserved LVEF undergoing chronic hemodialysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group enrolled 62 ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis three times weekly. BNP and ADM plasma concentration measurements and echocardiographic examination were performed 30 minutes after hemodialysis. E/e' ratio, evaluated by Tissue Doppler imaging and measured at the basal septum, was used as a surrogate marker for assessing left ventricular filling pressures. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 62 ± 25 years. The mean BNP and ADM values after hemodialysis were 0.40 ± 6.73 ng/ml and 0.06 ± 2.12 ng/ml, respectively. Elderly patients with hypertrophied left ventricles and larger left atria displayed higher E/e' values. BNP (r = 0.324. p = 0.018) and ADM (r = 0.319, p = 0.042) plasma levels were positively and significantly associated with E/eÎ. Multivariate regression analysis including BNP, ADM, age, hemodialysis duration, left ventricular end-systolic volume index, LVEF, left ventricular mass index and left atrium volume index, revealed that ADM (p-value 0.025) but not BNP levels, were independently associated with the E/e' ratio. CONCLUSIONS: ADM, but not BNP, was independently associated with septal E/e' in HD patients with preserved LVEF. ADM plasma levels can be used as a surrogate index to assess left ventricular filling pressures in HD patients.
Asunto(s)
Adrenomedulina/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Diálisis Renal , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation has emerged as the gold standard of ablative strategies to treat medically refractory paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Regardless of the superiority of catheter ablation based on PVI over antiarrhythmic drug therapy, recurrence rates of AF remain higher than desired. PVI via cryoablation has rapidly become a mainstream treatment for AF, due to its effectiveness and fast learning curve. Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of cryoablation in a single referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of results after cryoablation treatment of AF over three years. 146 patients with AF underwent a cryoablation procedure in our clinical center and were followed-up for three years after the procedure. All patients received cryoablation of the pulmonary veins, although concomitant procedures were performed in 6 patients (re-ablation), including radiofrequency and cryoablation. RESULTS: Cryoablation was clinically successful in 90.83% of the patients with paroxysmal AF and 60% of those with persistent AF. The clinical success of cryoablation was correlated with pretreatment with amiodarone and in the case of re-ablation. Concerning postoperative complications, major bleeding was correlated with female gender, treatment with rivaroxaban and amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: Among large trials, freedom from recurrent AF is about 65% with follow-up limited to 1 to 2 years. PVI via balloon cryoablation is a safe and efficient guideline-based treatment for AF, producing a durable event-free result in most patients out to 3 years with better outcomes than previously reported.
Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Criocirugía/métodos , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the treatment of choice in the medical management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The combination of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients who receive a coronary stent reduces the rate of stent thrombosis and the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, patients with acute coronary syndrome remain at risk of recurrent cardiovascular events despite the advance of medical therapy. The limitations of clopidogrel with variable antiplatelet effects and delayed onset of action are well established and lead to the development of newer P2Y12 inhibitors. Prasugrel is a selective adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist indicated for use in patients with ACS. Prasugrel provides greater inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel and has a rapid onset of action. We have conducted a systematic review to retrieve current evidence regarding the role of prasugrel in the management of ACS. Evidence comparing prasugrel, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor remain scant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A complete literature survey was performed using PubMed database search to gather available information regarding management of acute coronary syndromes and prasugrel. An explorative comparison of the safety and efficacy of prasugrel, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor was also conducted. RESULTS: Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more efficacious than clopidogrel in reducing the occurrence of non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular (CV) death but they have also an increased risk of major bleeding in comparison to clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel and ticagrelor are today the recommended first-line agents in patients with ACS. The estimation of which drug is superior over the other cannot be reliably established from the current trials.