Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mult Scler ; 30(7): 847-856, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646949

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study investigates clinical and biomarker differences between standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This is a prospective, double-arm, open-label, multi-center study in Denmark. Participants diagnosed with MS on ocrelizumab therapy >12 months were included (n = 184). Clinical, radiological, and blood-based biomarker outcomes were evaluated. MRI disease activity, relapses, worsening of neurostatus, and No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) were used as a combined endpoint. RESULTS: Out of 184 participants, 107 participants received EID (58.2%), whereas 77 participants received SID (41.8%). The average extension was 9 weeks with a maximum of 78 weeks. When comparing EID to SID, we found higher levels of B-cells, lower serum concentrations of ocrelizumab, and similar levels of age-adjusted NFL and GFAP in the two groups. No difference in NEDA-3 between EID and SID was demonstrated (hazard ratio: 1.174, p = 0.69). Higher levels of NFL were identified in participants with disease activity. Body mass index correlated with levels of ocrelizumab and B-cells. CONCLUSION: Extending one treatment interval of ocrelizumab on average 9 weeks and up to 78 weeks did not result in clinical, radiological, or biomarker evidence of worsening compared with SID.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Factores Inmunológicos , Humanos , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Esquema de Medicación , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/sangre
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569873

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently rely on relapse counts, T2 MRI lesion load (T2L) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores to guide treatment decisions for individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study evaluates how these factors, along with age and sex, influence prognosis during treatment with teriflunomide (TFL). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study using data from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry.Eligible participants had relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome and initiated TFL as their first treatment between 2013 and 2019. The effect of age, pretreatment relapses, T2L and EDSS scores on the risk of disease activity on TFL were stratified by sex. RESULTS: In total, 784 individuals were included (57.4% females). A high number of pretreatment relapses (≥2) was associated with an increased risk of disease activity in females only (OR and (95% CI): 1.76 (1.11 to 2.81)). Age group 50+ was associated with a lower risk of disease activity in both sexes (OR females=0.28 (0.14 to 0.56); OR males=0.22 (0.09 to 0.55)), while age 35-49 showed a different impact in males and females (OR females=0.79 (0.50 to 1.23); OR males=0.42 (0.24 to 0.72)). EDSS scores and T2L did not show any consistent associations. CONCLUSION: A high number of pretreatment relapses was only associated with an increased risk of disease activity in females, while age had a differential impact on the risk of disease activity according to sex. Clinicians may consider age, sex and relapses when deciding on TFL treatment.

3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 46(4): 282-5, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20571297

RESUMEN

A young adult patient with meningovascular neurosyphilis in the form of acute ischemic stroke with right hemiparesis and speech disturbance is reported. CT scan showed features of ischemic infarct and extensive laboratory studies were made before the diagnosis ultimately was revealed. Such cases could result in confusion for the clinician, and high index of clinical suspicion of this condition is required since syphilis is not routinely tested, as routine screening is seen to be of low diagnostic yield. As clinical practice indicates, it remains a difficult problem approaching diagnosis of neurosyphilis, and this is achieved through exclusion of neurosyphilis as a clinical possibility.


Asunto(s)
Neurosífilis , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Proteína C-Reactiva , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Neurosífilis/sangre , Neurosífilis/complicaciones , Neurosífilis/diagnóstico , Neurosífilis/diagnóstico por imagen , Neurosífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Penicilinas/administración & dosificación , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Tabes Dorsal/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...