Mandatory dexamethasone strictly monitored by pharmacists reduces the severity of pemetrexed-induced skin rash.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to retrospectively examine the effectiveness of mandatory dexamethasone (m-DEX) strictly monitored by pharmacists collaborating with medical physicians and nurses for reducing pemetrexed (PEM)-induced skin rash in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (ns-NSCLC). METHODS: We compared the rash grades during the first cycle of PEM-containing regimens between patients who received m-DEX after February 2012 and those who received dexamethasone (DEX) at their physician's discretion (d-DEX) before January 2012. RESULTS: Of 163 patients with ns-NSCLC included in this study, 89 received d-DEX and 74 received m-DEX. The mean DEX doses the night before and the day after PEM administration were significantly higher in the m-DEX group than in the d-DEX group. The frequency of grade ≥2 skin rash was significantly lower in the m-DEX group than in the d-DEX group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of m-DEX strictly monitored by pharmacists might significantly reduce the severity of PEM-induced skin rash.

[Evaluation of the Safety of a Generic Formulation of Cisplatin in Patients with Thoracic Malignancies].

Cisplatin (CDDP) is a key drug in the systemic treatment of various solid tumors. Brand-name CDDP may differ across generic formulations considering various clinical parameters. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to assess the safety of a generic CDDP formulation. To compare brand-name CDDP with a generic formulation, the incidence of adverse events, especially renal toxicity, was investigated in 500 patients with thoracic malignancies who received chemotherapy with more than 60 mg/m2 of either brand-name or generic CDDP. We compared the maximum serum creatinine (Cr) level after chemotherapy in the 2 groups. The correlation coefficients between the pretreatment Cr and the maximum Cr after CDDP administration did not differ between brand-name CDDP and generic CDDP (0.610 and 0.644, respectively; p=0.528). Furthermore, the correlation coefficients did not differ in subgroup analysis according to sex or adjuvant therapy. The severity of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups. In conclusion, generic CDDP can safely be used as an alternative to brand-name CDDP in the clinical setting.

Repeated General Anesthesia in a Patient With Noonan Syndrome.

Noonan syndrome (NS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by facial anomalies, short stature, chest deformity, congenital heart diseases, and other comorbidities. The challenges faced during anesthetic management of patients with NS could be due to congenital heart diseases, hemostatic disorders, and airway anomalies. Here we describe dental treatment under general anesthesia performed for a 28-year-old man with NS. He had characteristic features of NS along with mild pulmonary valve stenosis. Dental treatment under general anesthesia was performed successfully on 13 occasions with nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance or insertion of a reinforced laryngeal mask airway. This case suggests that for patients with NS, who might present several challenges, dental anesthesiologists should consider the extent of the patient's disorders to enable them to perform dental treatment safely under general anesthesia.

Anesthetic management by laryngeal mask airway in a patient with a history of difficult intubation resulting in dental injuries.

Disabled patients may face respiratory problems during general anesthesia because of head and neck anomalies. We describe a case of dental treatment under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway in a disabled patient who faced difficulty in endotracheal intubation on several occasions, 5 of which resulted in dental injuries.