Combination of Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria and YEARS Algorithm in a European Cohort of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Both the YEARS algorithm and the pulmonary embolism (PE) rule-out criteria (PERC) were created to exclude PE with limited diagnostic tests. A diagnostic strategy combining both scores might save additional computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) scans, but they have never been evaluated in conjunction. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficiency of combining YEARS and PERC in a single diagnostic strategy for suspected PE. METHODS: The PERC rule was assessed in 1,316 consecutive patients with suspected PE who were managed according to YEARS. We calculated the absolute difference (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) in failure rate and the number of 'saved' CTPAs for the scenario that PE would have been ruled out without CTPA in the absence of all PERC items. RESULTS: Using the YEARS algorithm, PE was diagnosed in 189 patients (14%), 680 patients (52%) were managed without CTPA and the 3-month rate of venous thromboembolism in patients in whom PE was ruled out was 0.44% (95% CI: 0.19-1.0). Only 6 of 154 patients (3.9%; 95% CI: 1.4-8.2) with no YEARS items who were referred for CTPA would have been PERC negative, of whom none were diagnosed with PE at baseline or during follow-up (0%; 95% CI: 0-64). Applying PERC before YEARS in all patients would have led to a failure rate of 1.42% (95% CI: 0.87-2.3%), 0.98% (95% CI: 0.17-1.9) more than shown in patients managed by YEARS. CONCLUSION: Combining YEARS with PERC would have yielded only a modest improvement of efficiency in patients without a YEARS item and an unacceptable failure rate in patients with ≥ 1 YEARS item.

Sex-specific performance of pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for pulmonary embolism.

Essentials Decision rules for pulmonary embolism are used indiscriminately despite possible sex-differences. Various pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms have been investigated in several prospective studies. When analysed at an individual patient data level the algorithms perform similarly in both sexes. Estrogen use and male sex were associated with a higher prevalence in suspected pulmonary embolism. SUMMARY: Background In patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE), clinical decision rules are combined with D-dimer testing to rule out PE, avoiding the need for imaging in those at low risk. Despite sex differences in several aspects of the disease, including its diagnosis, these algorithms are used indiscriminately in women and men. Objectives To compare the performance, defined as efficiency and failure rate, of three pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for PE between women and men: the Wells rule with fixed or with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off, and a recently validated algorithm (YEARS). A secondary aim was to determine the sex-specific prevalence of PE. Methods Individual patient data were obtained from six studies using the Wells rule (fixed D-dimer, n = 5; age adjusted, n = 1) and from one study using the YEARS algorithm. All studies prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with suspected PE. Main outcomes were efficiency (proportion of patients in which the algorithm ruled out PE without imaging) and failure rate (proportion of patients with PE not detected by the algorithm). Outcomes were estimated using (multilevel) logistic regression models. Results The main outcomes showed no sex differences in any of the separate algorithms. With all three, the prevalence of PE was lower in women (OR, 0.66, 0.68 and 0.74). In women, estrogen use, adjusted for age, was associated with lower efficiency and higher prevalence and D-dimer levels. Conclusions The investigated pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for patients suspected of PE show no sex differences in performance. Male sex and estrogen use are both associated with a higher probability of having the disease.

The YEARS algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism: shorter visit time and reduced costs at the emergency department.

Essentials The YEARS algorithm was designed to simplify the diagnostic workup of suspected pulmonary embolism. We compared emergency ward turnaround time of YEARS and the conventional algorithm. YEARS was associated with a significantly shorter emergency department visit time of ˜60 minutes. Treatment of pulmonary embolism was initiated 53 minutes earlier with the YEARS algorithm SUMMARY: Background Recently, the safety of the YEARS algorithm, designed to simplify the diagnostic work-up of pulmonary embolism (PE), was demonstrated. We hypothesize that by design, YEARS would be associated with a shorter diagnostic emergency department (ED) visit time due to simultaneous assessment of pre-test probability and D-dimer level and reduction in number of CT scans. Aim To investigate whether implementation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm is associated with a shorter ED visit time compared with the conventional algorithm and to evaluate the associated cost savings. Methods We selected consecutive outpatients with suspected PE from our hospital included in the YEARS study and ADJUST-PE study. Different time-points of the diagnostic process were extracted from the to-the-minute accurate electronic patients' chart system of the ED. Further, the costs of the ED visits were estimated for both algorithms. Results All predefined diagnostic turnaround times were significantly shorter after implementation of YEARS: patients were discharged earlier from the ED; 54 min (95% CI, 37-70) for patients managed without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 60 min (95% CI, 44-76) for the complete study population. Importantly, patients diagnosed with PE by CTPA received the first dose of anticoagulants 53 min (95% CI, 22-82) faster than those managed according to the conventional algorithm. Total costs were reduced by on average €123 per visit. Conclusion YEARS was shown to be associated with a shorter ED visit time compared with the conventional diagnostic algorithm, leading to faster start of treatment in the case of confirmed PE and savings on ED resources.

No added value of the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to the YEARS algorithm in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Essentials Imaging is warranted in the majority of patients to confirm or rule out pulmonary embolism (PE). The age-adjusted D-dimer (ADJUST) reduced the number of required imaging tests in patients ≥ 50 years. The YEARS algorithm was designed to improve the efficiency in patients with suspected PE. There was no added value of implementing ADJUST in the YEARS algorithm in our cohort. SUMMARY: Background The YEARS algorithm was designed to simplify the diagnostic work-up of pulmonary embolism (PE) and to reduce the number of necessary computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) scans. An alternative strategy to reduce the number of CTPAs is the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (ADJUST) in patients aged 50 years or older. We aimed to investigate whether a combination of both diagnostic strategies might save additional CTPAs. Methods The YEARS algorithm consists of three items (clinical signs of deep venous thrombosis, hemoptysis, 'PE most likely diagnosis') with simultaneous D-dimer testing using a pre-test dependent threshold. We performed a post hoc analysis in 3465 patients managed according to YEARS to compare the number of patients managed without CTPA scans and associated diagnostic failures in hypothetical scenarios with different YEARS-ADJUST combinations. Results Following the YEARS algorithm, 1651 patients (48%) were managed without CTPA; PE was diagnosed in 456 (13%) patients at baseline and 18 patients with initial normal testing suffered venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 3-month follow-up (failure rate 0.61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.96). If ADJUST had been fully integrated in YEARS, 1627 patients (47%) would have been managed without CTPA (absolute decrease of 0.69%; 95% CI -1.7 to 3.0), at cost of four additional missed PE diagnoses at baseline, for a projected 3-month VTE failure rate of 0.75% (95% CI, 0.49-1.13). None of the other studied scenarios showed relevant improvements in efficiency as well, but all led to more missed diagnoses. Conclusion In our cohort, there was no added value of implementing ADJUST in the YEARS algorithm.

[Peritoneal tuberculosis]. / Peritonitis tuberculosa.

Peritoneal tuberculosis was diagnosed in a 38-year-old man from Curaçao, a 42-year-old Dutch man and a 38-year-old woman from Surinam. All patients had been living in the Netherlands for over a decade at the time of diagnosis. Time to diagnosis and treatment varied between patients. Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis were nonspecific symptoms, failure to consider tuberculosis exposure, consulting of more than one physician and delay in obtaining adequate material for histopathologic and microbiologic tests. These cases show that peritoneal tuberculosis can represent a diagnostic challenge. Considering the rising incidence of tuberculosis in the Netherlands, general practitioners and medical specialists will encounter patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis more frequently. We recommend that tuberculosis exposure should always be considered by clinicians, even in patients originating from non-endemic countries. In case of suspected peritoneal tuberculosis, laparoscopy with peritoneal biopsy is the diagnostic tool of choice and should be performed without delay.

Use of clinical prediction rules and D-dimer tests in the diagnostic management of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Because pregnant women have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and at the same time normal pregnancy is associated with symptoms, mimicking those present in the setting of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the latter diagnosis is frequently suspected in this patient category. Since imaging tests expose both mother and foetus to ionizing radiation, the ability to rule out PE based on non-radiological diagnostic tests is of paramount importance. However, clinical decision rules have only been scarcely evaluated in the pregnant population with suspected PE, while D-dimer levels lose diagnostic accuracy due to a physiological increase during normal pregnancy. Consequently, clinical guidelines provide contradicting and weak recommendations on this subject and the optimal diagnostic strategy remains highly debated. With this systematic review, we aimed to summarize current evidence on the safety and efficacy of clinical decision rules and biomarkers used in the diagnostic management of suspected acute PE in pregnant patients.