Resultados quirúrgicos de la herniorrafia inguinal en los pacientes mayores de 80 años: Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis / Surgical outcomes of inguinal herniorrhaphy in patients over 80 yearsof age: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Introducción. Los pacientes octogenarios y nonagenarios conforman un grupo etario en progresivo crecimiento. La hernia inguinal es una patología que aumenta progresivamente con la edad. Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo conocer los resultados quirúrgicos de los pacientes mayores de 80 años a quienes se les realizó herniorrafía inguinal. Métodos. De acuerdo con las guías PRISMA, se realizó una revisión sistemática de PubMed, Embase y Google Scholar. Se incluyeron estudios que reportaron la incidencia de complicaciones y mortalidad después de una herniorrafía inguinal en los pacientes octogenarios y nonagenarios. Se calculó la proporción de pacientes con complicaciones después de una herniorrafía inguinal según los datos presentados, con su respectivo intervalo de confianza del 95 %. Resultados. Catorce estudios reportaron un total de 19.290 pacientes, entre quienes se encontró una incidencia acumulada de infección del sitio operatorio de 0,5 % (IC95% 0,460 - 0,678), seroma de 8,7 % (IC95% 6,212 - 11,842), hematoma de 2,6 % (IC95% 2,397 - 2,893), dolor crónico de 2,1 % (IC95% 0,778 - 4,090) y recidiva de 1,2 % (IC95%0,425 - 2,284), para una morbilidad de 14,7 % (IC95% 9,525 - 20,833). Conclusión. Las complicaciones de la herida quirúrgica, el dolor crónico y la recidiva en los pacientes mayores de 80 años a quienes se les realiza herniorrafia inguinal son comparables con las de la población general.

Introduction. Octogenarian and nonagenarian patients constitute a progressively growing age group. Inguinal hernia is a pathology that increases with age. This study aims to understand the surgical outcomes of inguinal herniorrhaphy in patients over 80 years of age. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting the incidence of complications and mortality after inguinal herniorrhaphy in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients were included. The proportion of patients with complications after inguinal herniorrhaphy was calculated based on the data presented, with its respective 95% confidence interval. Results. Fourteen studies reported a total of 19,290 patients, among whom a cumulative incidence of surgical site infection of 0.5 (95% CI 0.460 ­ 0.678), seroma of 8.7% (95% CI 6.212 ­ 11.842), hematoma of 2.6% (95% CI 2.397 ­ 2.893), chronic pain 2.1% (95% CI 0.778 ­ 4.090), recurrence 1.2% (95% CI 0.425 ­ 2.284), and morbidity 14.7% (95% CI 9.525 ­ 20.833) were found. Conclusion. Surgical wound complications, chronic pain, and recurrence in patients over 80 years of age undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy are comparable to those in the general population.

Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conversion to open as a bailout procedure: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality in patients taken to conversion to open procedure (CO) and subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) as bailout procedures when performing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHOD: This observational cohort study retrospectively analyzed patients taken to SLC or CO as bailout surgery during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for morbimortality. RESULTS: A total of 675 patients were included. Of the 675 patients (mean [SD] age 63.85 ± 16.00 years; 390 [57.7%] male) included in the analysis, 452 (67%) underwent CO and 223 (33%) underwent SLC. Overall, neither procedure had an increased risk of major complications (89 [19.69%] vs 35 [15.69%] P.207). However, CO had an increased risk of bile duct injury (18 [3.98] vs 1 [0.44] P.009), bleeding (mean [SD] 165.43 ± 368.57 vs 43.25 ± 123.42 P < .001), intestinal injury (20 [4.42%] vs 0 [0.00] P.001), and wound infection (18 [3.98%] vs 2 [0.89%] P.026), while SLC had a higher risk of bile leak (15 [3.31] vs 16 [7.17] P.024). On the multivariable analysis, Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; CI95%, 1.01-1.42), use of anticoagulant agents (OR, 2.56; CI95%, 1.21-5.44), classification of severity of cholecystitis grade III (OR, 2.96; CI95%, 1.48-5.94), and emergency admission (OR, 6.07; CI95%, 1.33-27.74) were associated with presenting major complications. CONCLUSIONS: SLC was less associated with complications; however, there is scant evidence on its long-term outcomes. Further research is needed on SLC to establish if it is the safest in the long-term as a bailout procedure.

Eosinophilic enterocolitis in duodenum, ileum, and colon: A case report.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a rare disease which mainly consists of an abnormal eosinophile infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract. It's classified according to its location: eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis (including duodenum, jejunum and/or ileum) and eosinophilic colitis and degree of infiltration (mucosal, muscular, serosal). Depending on eosinophile concentration, type of EGE and the patient's condition it may manifest with different clinical presentations such as functional dyspepsia, abdominal pain, irritability, hypoproteinemia, diarrhea, anemia, among others. Few research has been done on such an uncommon pathology to the extent that treatment evidence is mostly limited to small case series. This case study reports an infrequent presentation of EGE in the small and large intestine as an undifferentiated gastrointestinal disease and successful corticoid management given to the patient in order to further broaden knowledge on this subject and facilitate an established clinical conduct for the treating physician.

Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis (CHISPA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Acute pancreatitis is the recurrent reason for gastrointestinal admission in a clinical urgent setting, it happens secondary to a wide array of pathologies out of which biliary disease stands as one of the most frequent causes for its presentation. Approximately 20% of pancreatitis are of moderate or severe severity. Currently, there is not a clear recommendation on timing for cholecystectomy, either early or delayed. CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superior clinical trial. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. It seeks to evaluate differences between patients taken to early cholecystectomy during hospital admission (72 hours after randomization) versus delayed cholecystectomy (30±5 days after randomization). The primary endpoint is major complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy defined as a Clavien-Dindo score of over III/V during the first 90 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints include recurrence of biliary disease, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), days of postoperative hospital stay, and length of stay in an intensive therapy unit postoperatively (if it applies). The CHISPA trial has been designed to demonstrate that delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces the rate of complications associated to an episode of severe biliary pancreatitis compared to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Trial registration number: NCT06113419.

Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify which risk factors are associated with the appearance of an incisional hernia in a stoma site after its closure. This in the sake of identifying which patients would benefit from a preventative intervention and thus start implementing a cost-effective protocol for prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting incidence, risk factors, and follow-up time for appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure were included. A fixed-effects and random effects models were used to calculate odds ratios' estimates and standardized mean values with their respective grouped 95% confidence interval. This to evaluate the association between possible risk factors and the appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure. RESULTS: Seventeen studies totaling 2899 patients were included. Incidence proportion between included studies was of 16.76% (CI95% 12.82; 21.62). Out of the evaluated factors higher BMI (p = 0.0001), presence of parastomal hernia (p = 0.0023), colostomy (p = 0,001), and end stoma (p = 0.0405) were associated with the appearance of incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure, while malignant disease (p = 0.0084) and rectum anterior resection (p = 0.0011) were found to be protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic mesh placement should be considered as an effective preventative intervention in high-risk patients (obese patients, patients with parastomal hernia, colostomy, and end stoma patients) with the goal of reducing incisional hernia rates in stoma site after closure while remaining cost-effective.

State of the art in subtotal cholecystectomy: An overview.

Introduction: Subtotal cholecystectomy is a type of surgical bail-out procedure indicated when facing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to not reaching the critical view of safety, inadequate identification of the anatomical structures involved and/or risk of injury. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search on PubMed were performed using the following Mesh terms: Subtotal cholecystectomy and Partial cholecystectomy. The PubMed databases were used to search for English-language reports related to Subtotal cholecystectomy between January 1, 1987, the date of the first published laparoscopic cholecystectomy, through January 2023. 41 studies were included. Results: Subtotal cholecystectomy's incidence oscillates between 4.00% and 9.38%. Strasberg et al., divided subtotal cholecystectomies in "fenestrating" and "reconstituting" types based on if the remaining portion of the gallbladder was left open or closed. Subtotal cholecystectomy can sometimes be a challenging procedure and is associated to a high rate of complications such as biliary fistula, retained gallstones, subhepatic or subphrenic collections, among others. Conslusion: Subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe alternative when facing difficult cholecystectomy in which the critical view of safety is not reached in order to avoid complications. A classification system should be implemented in surgical descriptions to compare the different surgical techniques employed. In order to avoid bile leakage and cholecystitis of the remnant gallbladder, the surgical technique must be performed skillfully. There is still a current lack of information on alternative techniques such as omental plugging or falciform patch in order to judge their utility. There needs to be further research on long-term complications such as malignancy of the remnant gallbladder.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD may have less favorable outcomes than LC, but also that LC-associated complications increase in direct relation to patient age. There is no recommendation supported by robust evidence to decide between one or the other procedure in super elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed to analyze the surgical outcomes of super elderly patients with cholecystitis who underwent LC versus PCD for treatment. The surgical outcomes of a subgroup of high-risk patients were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2021 were included. The median age of patients were 92 years (IQR: 4.00) with a female predominance (58.33%). The overall morbidity rate in the series was 36.45% and mortality rate was 7.29%. There was no statistically significant difference when compared to the associated morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent LC versus those who underwent PCD, neither in the analysis of the complete series or in the subgroup of high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity and mortality associated with the two most frequently recommended therapeutic options for operating super elderly patients with acute cholecystitis are high. We found no evidence of superiority in outcomes for either of the two procedures in this age group.