Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(1): 209-218, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32504204

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic primary or incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh placement is a well-accepted and safe technique. Evidence for complications however remains inconclusive, and little is known about the occurrence of postoperative ileus secondary to postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions with different types of IPOM meshes used. Therefore, we retrospectively compared the occurrence of postoperative ileus between two of the different meshes used in our center. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-five patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh placement, either with a DynaMesh®-IPOM (FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany) or a Parietex™ Composite mesh (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), at the Heilig-Hart Hospital in Lier (Antwerp, Belgium) between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively compared with regard to the occurrence of postoperative ileus until 6 weeks postoperatively. Baseline demographics and clinical data up to 6 weeks postoperatively of the patients in the two mesh groups are provided. RESULTS: The DynaMesh®-IPOM mesh group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative ileus compared with the Parietex™ Composite mesh group with a cutoff limit at postoperative day 1 (n = 17, 6.8% vs. n = 0, 0.0%; P = 0.003) and postoperative day 4 (n = 13, 5.2% vs. n = 0, 0.0%, P = 0.006), even with a mesh surface area of ≤ 300 cm2 and when both meshes were fixated with the same method of fixation (Securestrap™) with a cutoff limit for postoperative ileus at postoperative day 1 (n = 4, 7.7% vs. n = 0, 0.0%; P = 0.013) and postoperative day 4 (n = 3, 5.8% vs. n = 0, 0.0%, P = 0.040). Of the 17 patients with a postoperative ileus, 9 (52.9%) had a suspicion of adhesive small bowel obstruction on CT scan (P = 0.033) with definitive confirmation of small bowel adhesions with the DynaMesh®-IPOM mesh at laparoscopy in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm current literature available regarding postoperative ileus secondary to postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions with the DynaMesh®-IPOM mesh. However, further research with well-designed, multicenter randomized controlled studies to evaluate the use and related complications of these meshes is needed.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Ileus , Hernia Incisional , Laparoscopía , Colágeno , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Ileus/epidemiología , Ileus/etiología , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Poliésteres , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos
2.
Acta Chir Belg ; 118(6): 392-397, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29173076

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is an infrequent cause of acute mesenteric ischemia with atypical symptoms and a high mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report two cases of NOMI characterized by their difference in etiology, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: In the first case, the patient developed NOMI after septic shock, she was successfully treated with surgery. The second patient experienced two episodes of cardiac arrest followed by NOMI. He received only supportive care and died shortly after. We present a short review of the literature, discussing epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, diagnosis and management of NOMI. CONCLUSION: NOMI is a rare disease with a difficult diagnosis. Early recognition and treatment with supportive therapy, vasodilator drugs and possibly surgery can significantly lower mortality.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparotomía/métodos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/complicaciones , Náusea/diagnóstico , Náusea/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/diagnóstico , Vómitos/etiología
3.
Case Rep Surg ; 2016: 5909248, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097034

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 58-year-old man who underwent urgent blowhole colostomy for toxic megacolon (TM) secondary to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). This infection occurred under antibiotic coverage with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, four days after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in our hospital. Although prospective clinical research regarding the surgical management of TM is lacking, decompressive procedures like blowhole colostomy are reported to carry a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality and are widely regarded as obsolete. Subtotal or total colectomy with end ileostomy is currently considered the procedure of choice. After presenting our case, we discuss the literature available on the subject to argue that the scarce evidence on the optimal surgical treatment for TM is primarily based on TM associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and that there might be a rationale for considering minimally invasive procedures like blowhole colostomy for CDI-associated TM.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA