Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 87(6): e2021, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597522

RESUMEN

Implantation of glaucoma drainage devices is a valuable therapeutic option, particularly in children with glaucoma refractory to primary surgical treatment. Glaucoma drainage devices are typically used when conjunctival scarring hampers filtration surgery or prior angle procedures are not effective in controlling intraocular pressure. Despite known complications, the use of glaucoma drainage devices in children has increased in recent years, even as the primary surgical option. In this review, we evaluate the results of recent studies involving the implantation of glaucoma drainage devices in children, discussing new advances, and comparing the success rates and complications of different devices.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Conjuntiva , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Glaucoma , Niño , Humanos , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma/efectos adversos , Glaucoma/cirugía , Presión Intraocular , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;87(6): e2021, 2024. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1557108

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Implantation of glaucoma drainage devices is a valuable therapeutic option, particularly in children with glaucoma refractory to primary surgical treatment. Glaucoma drainage devices are typically used when conjunctival scarring hampers filtration surgery or prior angle procedures are not effective in controlling intraocular pressure. Despite known complications, the use of glaucoma drainage devices in children has increased in recent years, even as the primary surgical option. In this review, we evaluate the results of recent studies involving the implantation of glaucoma drainage devices in children, discussing new advances, and comparing the success rates and complications of different devices.


RESUMO O implante de dispositivos de drenagem para glaucoma (DDGs) é uma opção terapêutica valiosa, principalmente em crianças com glaucoma refratário ao tratamento cirúrgico primário. Os dispositivos de drenagem para glaucoma têm sido utilizados principalmente quando a cicatrização conjuntival dificulta a cirurgia fistulizante ou procedimentos angulares prévios não foram eficazes no controle da pressão intraocular. Apesar das complicações conhecidas, o uso de dispositivos de drenagem para glaucoma em crianças tem aumentado nos últimos anos, inclusive como opção cirúrgica primária. Nesta revisão, atualizamos os resultados de estudos recentes envolvendo o implante de dispositivos de drenagem para glaucoma em crianças, discutindo novos avanços e comparando diferentes dispositivos, taxas de sucesso e complicações.

3.
Behav Brain Res ; 315: 115-22, 2016 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531502

RESUMEN

The elevated T-maze was developed to test the hypothesis that serotonin plays an opposing role in the regulation of defensive behaviors associated with anxiety and panic. Previous pharmacological exploitation of this test supports the association between inhibitory avoidance acquisition and escape expression with anxiety and fear/panic, respectively. In the present study, we extend the pharmacological validation of this test by investigating the effects of other putative or clinically effective anxiety- and panic-modulating drugs. The results showed that chronic, but not acute injection of the reversible monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor moclobemide (3, 10 and 30mg/kg) inhibited escape expression, indicating a panicolytic-like effect. The same effect was observed after either acute or chronic treatment with alprazolam (1, 2 and 4mg/kg), a high potency benzodiazepine. This drug also impaired inhibitory avoidance acquisition, suggesting an anxiolytic effect. On the other hand, subcutaneous administration of the 5-HT1D/1B receptor agonist sumatriptan (0.1, 0.5 and 2.5µg/kg) facilitated escape performance, indicating a panicogenic-like effect, while treatment with α-para-chlorophenylalanine (p-CPA; 4days i.p injections of 100mg/kg, or a single i.p injection of 300mg/kg), which caused marked 5-HT depletion in the amygdala and striatum, was without effect. Altogether, these results are in full agreement with the clinical effects of these compounds and offer further evidence that the elevated T-maze has broad predictive validity for the effects of anxiety- and panic-modulating drugs.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/farmacología , Aprendizaje por Laberinto/efectos de los fármacos , Pánico/efectos de los fármacos , Alprazolam/farmacología , Animales , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Reacción de Fuga/efectos de los fármacos , Conducta Exploratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Fenclonina/farmacología , Locomoción/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Moclobemida/farmacología , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Serotonina/metabolismo , Sumatriptán/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA