Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
6.
Br J Surg ; 107(3): 289-300, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31873948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer have not been studied. This study aimed to compare laparoscopic with open re-resection of incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer while minimizing selection bias. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer who underwent re-resection with curative intent at four centres between 2000 and 2017. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed by intention to treat. Inverse probability of surgery treatment weighting using propensity scoring was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients underwent re-resection (190 open, 65 laparoscopic). Nineteen laparoscopic procedures were converted to open operation. Surgery before 2011 was the only factor associated with conversion. Duration of hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopic re-resection (median 4 versus 6 days; P < 0·001). Three-year OS rates for laparoscopic and open re-resection were 87 and 62 per cent respectively (P = 0·502). Independent predictors of worse OS were residual cancer found at re-resection (hazard ratio (HR) 1·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·17 to 3·11), blood loss of at least 500 ml (HR 1·83, 1·23 to 2·74) and at least four positive nodes (HR 3·11, 1·46 to 6·65). In competing-risks analysis, the RFS incidence was higher for laparoscopic re-resection (P = 0·038), but OS did not differ between groups. Independent predictors of worse RFS were one to three positive nodes (HR 2·16, 1·29 to 3·60), at least four positive nodes (HR 4·39, 1·96 to 9·82) and residual cancer (HR 2·42, 1·46 to 4·00). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic re-resection for selected patients with incidental gallbladder cancer is oncologically non-inferior to an open approach. Dissemination of advanced laparoscopic skills and timely referral of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer to specialized centres may allow more patients to benefit from this operation.


ANTECEDENTES: No se conoce la seguridad y la eficacia oncológica de la re-resección laparoscópica del cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar. Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar las re-resecciones del cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar por vía laparoscópica y vía abierta, minimizando el sesgo de selección. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes observacional, retrospectivo y multicéntrico de pacientes con cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar que se sometieron a una re-resección con intención curativa en 4 centros entre 2000 y 2017. Se analizó la supervivencia global (overall survival, OS) y la supervivencia libre de recidiva (recurrence free survival, RFS) según intención de tratamiento. Se calculó la probabilidad inversa de la ponderación del tratamiento quirúrgico utilizando puntuación de propensión. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 255 pacientes con re-resección (190 por vía abierta y 65 por vía laparoscópica). Se convirtieron 19 pacientes del grupo laparoscópico. El único factor relacionado con la conversión fue la realización de la cirugía antes de año 2011. La mediana de la estancia hospitalaria fue más corta tras la re-resección laparoscópica (4 versus 6 días; P < 0,001). La OS a tres años fue del 87% y del 62% (P = 0,502) para las re-resecciones laparoscópicas y abiertas, respectivamente). Los factores predictivos independientes relacionados con una peor OS fueron el hallazgo de cáncer residual en el momento de la re-resección (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 1,91; i.c. del 95% 1,17-3,11), una pérdida hemática > 500 ml (HR 1,83; i.c. del 95% 1,23-2,74) y la presencia de ≥ 4 ganglios positivos (HR 3,11; i.c. del 95% 1,46-6,65). En el análisis de riesgo competitivo, la RFS fue mayor para la resección laparoscópica (P = 0,038), pero no hubo diferencias en la OS entre ambos grupos. Los factores predictivos independientes de peor RFS fueron la detección de 1-3 ganglios positivos (HR 2,16; i.c. del 95% 1,29-3,60), ≥ 4 ganglio positivos (HR 4,39; i.c. del 95% 1,96-9,82) y el cáncer residual (HR 2,42; i.c. de 95% 1,46-4,0). CONCLUSIÓN: En pacientes seleccionados, los resultados oncológicos de la re-resección laparoscópica de un cáncer incidental de vesícula biliar no son inferiores a los que se obtienen por vía abierta. Una mayor difusión de las técnicas laparoscópicas avanzadas y una oportuna derivación de los pacientes con cáncer de vesícula biliar incidental a centros especializados podrían permitir que un mayor número de pacientes se beneficiaran de este abordaje.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Laparotomía/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Chile/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Adulto Joven
7.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(7): 1330-1336, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28359594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastrectomy represents the main treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma. This procedure is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative mortality changes across the study period and to identify predictive factors of 30-day mortality after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of a prospective database from a single centre. Patients treated with an elective gastrectomy from 1996 to 2014 for gastric adenocarcinoma were included. We compared postoperative mortality between four time periods: 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2006-2010, and 2011-2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify predictors of 30-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS: We included 1066 patients (median age 65 years; 67% male). The 30-day mortality rate was 4.7%. Mortality decreased across the four time periods; from 6.5% to 1.8% (P = 0.022). In the univariate analysis, age, ASA score, albumin <3.5, multivisceral resection, splenectomy, intrathoracic esophagojejunal anastomosis, R status, and T status were significantly associated with postoperative mortality. In the multivariate analysis, ASA class 3 (OR 10.06; CI 1.97-51.3; P = 0.005) and multivisceral resection (OR 1.6; CI 1.09-2.36; P = 0.016) were associated with higher postoperative 30-day mortality; surgery between 2011 and 2014 was associated with lower postoperative 30-day mortality (OR 0.55; CI 0.33-0.15; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: There was a decrease in postoperative 30-day mortality during this 18-year period at our institution. We have identified ASA score and multivisceral resection as predictors of 30-day mortality for elective gastrectomy for cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidad/tendencias , Pancreatectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Esplenectomía
8.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 60(6): 734-46, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899676

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the dose-effect relationship of rocuronium at the adductor pollicis and masseter muscles. METHODS: Ten, ASA I, adult patients, received a bolus dose of rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg during propofol based anesthesia. Train-of-four (TOF) was simultaneously monitored at the masseter and the adductor pollicis muscles until recovery. Rocuronium arterial serum concentrations were measured during 120 min. The first twitch of the TOF response was used to characterize the time-effect profile of both muscles using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis in NONMEM. A decrease in NONMEM objective function (∆OFV) of 3.84 points for an added parameter was considered significant at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: Onset time at the masseter (mean ± SD, 1.5 ± 0.9 min) was faster than at the adductor pollicis (2.7 ± 1.4 min, P < 0.05). Recovery, measured as the time to TOF ratio = 0.9 was similar between muscles 29.9 ± 6.7 (adductor pollicis) vs. 29.3 ± 8.1 (masseter). (P = 0.77). The estimated pharmacodynamic parameters [mean (95% CI)] of the adductor pollicis muscle and the masseter muscle were; plasma effect-site equilibration half-time (teq) 3.25 (2.34, 3.69) min vs. 2.86 (1.83, 3.29) min, (∆OFV 383.665); Ce50 of 1.24 (1.13, 1.56) mg/l vs. 1.19 (1.00, 1.21) mg/l, (∆OFV 184.284); Hill coefficient of 3.97 (3.82, 5.62) vs. 4.68 (3.83, 5.71), (∆OFV 78.906). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the masseter muscle has faster onset of blockade and similar recovery profile than adductor pollicis muscle. These findings were best, explained by a faster plasma effect-site equilibration of the masseter muscle to rocuronium.


Asunto(s)
Músculo Masetero/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes/farmacocinética , Androstanoles/farmacocinética , Anestesia , Mano , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos
9.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 81(4): 257.e1-6, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24857432

RESUMEN

In 2011, the Spanish Association of Pediatrics decided to support the most ambitious project of its newly created Committee for Medicinal Products: Pediamécum. This is the first free on-line database with information on medicinal products for pediatric use in Spain. The web page http://pediamecum.es/ started on December 17 December 2012. One year later, Pediamécum includes 580 registered drugs. The website achieved more than one million page views by the end of 2013. Because of the first anniversary of Pediamécum, a survey was performed to request the feeling of users. Four hundred eighty-three responses were obtained. Ninety-five percent believed that it is easy to navigate through the web, and 74% said that their doubts about the use of medicines in children were always resolved. The overall rating of Pediamécum is 7.5/10. The aims of Pediamécum are being accomplished; which is reflected essentially due to it becoming a useful tool for all professionals who care for children in their daily clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Internet , Aplicaciones Móviles , Pediatría , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Niño , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , España , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA