Effectiveness of Ferric, Ferrous, and Aluminum (Hydr)Oxide Coprecipitation to Treat Water Contaminated with Arsenate.

Coprecipitation of Fe and Al (hydr)oxides has been considered a low-cost process to remove As from wastewater. Arsenate is the most stable form of As in aerobic environments such as surface water, soils, and sediments and can be removed from water through methods based on this process. Iron/aluminum molar ratios of 100:0, 80:20, and 60:40 were used to treat water contaminated with As at concentrations of 50 and 500 mg L. Aluminum, ferrous, and ferric sulfates were used to coprecipitate Al and Fe (hydr)oxides at high pH. Maghemite, magnetite, lepidocrocite, and goethite were detected in precipitates from Fe(II), whereas hematite and ferrihydrite were identified in Fe(III) treatments. Segregation of Al (hydr)oxides as gibbsite and bayerite as well as the Al isomorphic substitution in Fe (hydr)oxides were detected in the presence of Al. The precipitates were classified as nonhazardous according to the leaching test based on Brazilian Technical Standard NBR 10005. The presence of Al increased the stability of the sludge from Fe(II) treatments but did not affect the stability of precipitates from Fe(III) treatments. High efficiencies for As removal from water were obtained for all treatments, but concentrations of soluble As were, in general, lower for Fe(III) treatments especially, in the absence of Al. Treatments were efficient in reaching the threshold to effluent discharge (0.5 mg L), but only treatments with initially 50 mg L of As reached the threshold for drinking water (10 µg L).

Arsenite removal from contaminated water by precipitation of aluminum, ferrous and ferric (hydr)oxides.

Several methods to remove arsenic from water have been considered, including co-precipitation with Fe and Al (hydr)oxides. Such compounds are considered very effective to remove As from contaminated water due to strong bindings between them. Three Fe:Al molar ratios (100:0, 80:20, and 60:40) were used to synthesize aluminum, ferrous, and ferric (hydr)oxides by precipitation in water highly contaminated with arsenite (50 and 500 mg L-1). The method was very efficient for all treatments (> 93%) at the beginning of the incubation period, excepted the one with 60:40 Fe(II):Al molar ratio at the higher As concentration (500 mg L-1) in which gibbsite was identified in precipitated phases. In spite of the high efficiency, however, the threshold for drinking water was not attained, mainly to the higher As concentration, even 84 days after precipitation. At this high concentration of arsenite, even the required threshold for effluent discharge was not attained in some treatments. The sludge resulting from treatments with higher As concentration were considered hazardous according to results from leaching test and corroborated by BCR extractions. Arsenic associated with Al and adsorbed phases were also assessed by extractions with NH4F and KH2PO4, respectively. In general, the presence of Al increased the efficiency as well as the stability of the sludge resulting from Fe (II) treatments, but did not affect Fe (III) treatments, which were more efficient for As removal.