Grade IV fibrosis interferes in biliary drainage after Kasai procedure.

OBJECTIVES: Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common cause of liver transplantation in children. The earlier the treatment is done, the better the prognosis. The aim is to evaluate the impact of late diagnosis in children with BA, including the histopathological findings and success rate of biliary drainage in patients submitted to hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of cases of BA in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) between 1998-2011. We found 63 cases of BA; of these, 42 underwent HPE and 21 were referred for liver transplantation. Clinic and pathologic data were evaluated. RESULTS: The HPE was performed with a mean age of 86.5 days, with 16.6% having the operation at 60 days or earlier; 59.2% between 61 and 90 days; and 23.8% after 90 days. Successful biliary drainage occurred in 31% of surgeries, Mean days when HPE drained was 69.1 days, and 94.3 days when the surgery did not drain (P = .05). All patients who were successfully drained, did not have grade IV fibrosis on histology. In cases in which surgery was performed after 60 days that had not drained, 25% had grade IV fibrosis on biopsy (P = .0469). CONCLUSION: The age of HPE relates to better prognosis of the disease. It was found that the rate of grade IV fibrosis is higher in no drainage patients. All patients with grade IV fibrosis had no biliary drainage.

Comparison of idiopathic achalasia and Chagas' disease esophagopathy at the light of high-resolution manometry.

The comparison between idiopathic achalasia (IA) and Chagas' disease esophagopathy (CDE) may evaluate if treatment options and their outcomes can be accepted universally. This study aims to compare IA and CDE at the light of high-resolution manometry. We studied 86 patients with achalasia: 45 patients with CDE (54% females, mean age 55 years) and 41 patients with IA (58% females, mean age 49 years). All patients underwent high-resolution manometry. Upper esophageal sphincter parameters were similar (basal pressure CDE = 72 ± 45 mmHg, IA = 82 ± 57 mmHg; residual pressure CDE = 9.9 ± 9.9 mmHg, IA = 9.8 ± 7.5 mmHg). In the body of the esophagus, the amplitude was higher in the IA group than the CDE group at 3 cm (CDE = 15 ± 14 mm Hg, IA = 42 ± 52 mmHg, P = 0.003) and 7 cm (CDE = 16 ± 15 mmHg, IA = 36 ± 57 mmHg, P = 0.04) above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The LES basal pressure (CDE = 17 ± 16 mmHg, IA = 40 ± 22 mmHg, P < 0.001) and residual pressure (CDE = 12 ± 11 mmHg, IA = 27 ± 13 mmHg, P < 0.001) were also higher in the IA group. Our results show that: (i) there is no difference in regards to the upper esophageal sphincter; (ii) higher pressures of the esophageal body are noticed in patients with IA; and (iii) basal and residual pressures of the LES are lower in patients with CDE. Our results did not show expressive manometric differences between IA and CDE. Some differences may be attributed to a more pronounced esophageal dilatation in patients with CDE.

Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

An unbuffered layer of acidity that escapes neutralization by food has been demonstrated in volunteers and gastroesophageal reflux disease patients. This postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket (PPGAP) is manometrically defined by the presence of acid reading (pH<4) in a segment of the proximal stomach between nonacid segments distally (food) and proximally (lower esophageal sphincter or distal esophagus). The PPGAP may have important clinical implications; however, it is still poorly understood. Gastric anatomy and physiology seem to be important elements for PPGAP genesis. Gastric operations and acid suppression medications may decrease distal - proximal intragastric acid reflux and help control gastroesophageal reflux.

Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket in patients after distal gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: An unbuffered postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket (PPGAP) has been noticed in the majority of normal individuals and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The role of gastric anatomy, specifically the antrum, in the physiology of the PPGAP is not yet fully elucidated. This study aims to analyze the presence of PPGAP in patients submitted to distal gastrectomy. METHODS: A total of 15 patients who had a distal gastrectomy plus DII lymphadenectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric adenocarcinoma (mean age 64.3±8.4 years, 12 females) were studied. All patients were free of foregut symptoms after the operation. Patients underwent a high-resolution manometry. A station pull-through pH monitoring was performed from 5cm below the lower border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LBLES) to the LBLES in increments of 1cm in a fasting state and 10min after a standardized fatty meal. Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket was defined by the presence of acid reading (pH<4) in a segment of the proximal stomach between non-acid segments distally (food) and proximally (LBLES). The PPGAP extent was recorded. The protocol was approved by local ethics committee. Key Results Acidity was not detected in the stomach of nine patients before meal. After meal, PPGAP was not found in three patients. In three patients (20%), a PPGAP was noted with an extension of 1, 1 and 3cm. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In conclusion, PPGAP is present in a minority of patients after distal gastrectomy; this finding may suggest that the gastric antrum may play a role in the genesis of the PPGAP.

Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket and gastric pressure in patients after gastric surgery.

BACKGROUND: An unbuffered postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket (PPGAP) has been demonstrated in normal individuals (NI) and patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The role of gastric anatomy and gastric motility in the physiology of the PPGAP remains elusive. This study aims to analyze the correlation of PPGAP with proximal gastric pressure after gastric surgery. METHODS: A total of 26 individuals were studied: eight patients after open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for morbid obesity, six patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD, seven patients after open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and five NI. Patients underwent high resolution manometry to identify the location of the lower border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LBLES) and measure gastric pressure 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cm below the LBLES, immediately before swallow and after the end of the LES relaxation. A station pull-through pH monitoring was performed in all but NI, from 5 cm below the LBLES to the LBLES in increments of 1 cm in a fasting state and 10 min after a standardized fatty meal. KEY RESULTS: Our results show that: (i) proximal gastric pressures are lower after swallow compared with before swallow in NI; (ii) patients after gastric surgery tend to have higher gastric pressure before and lower after swallow compared with NI and (iii) patients after RYGB with PPGAP have an increased gastric pressure after swallows in the segment where the PPGAP is noticed. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Gastric motility may play a role in the genesis of PPGAP in patients after RYGB. The contribution of gastric motility for the genesis of PPGAP is still elusive in other patients.