Femoral Hernias: Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors and 30-Day Outcomes of Initial Groin Hernias Using ACS-NSQIP.

Femoral hernias are infrequently encountered groin hernias. The purpose of this study was to describe the natural history of femoral hernias by evaluating patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, 30-day mortality, and risk factors for postoperative complications compared with inguinal hernias and in reducible versus incarcerated hernias. Overall 5360 femoral hernia repairs and 183,173 inguinal hernia repairs were identified using the 2005 to 2015 American College of Surgeon-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's database. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics between femoral and inguinal hernias and between reducible and nonreducible femoral hernias. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications after repair. Femoral hernias accounted for 2.8 per cent of initial groin hernias and 18.9 per cent of all groin hernias in females. A total of 56.5 per cent of initial femoral hernias were nonreducible and these patients were significantly older. Rates of small bowel resection (5.7 vs 0.3%, P < 0.0001), exploratory laparotomy (2.5% vs 0.4%, P < 0.0001), and diagnostic laparoscopy (2.0% vs 0.7%, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in incarcerated femoral hernias compared with reducible femoral hernias. There were significantly higher rates of unplanned return to the OR, postoperative sepsis, and 30-day mortality in incarcerated femoral hernias versus reducible femoral hernias. Most femoral hernias present incarcerated in older, female patients. Femoral hernias present more commonly incarcerated in patients with significant comorbid diseases and are associated with significantly increased rates of systemic, local, major, and minor complications, return to OR, and mortality. Careful consideration should be given for the evaluation of intestinal viability in the acute setting.

Determination of Proper Timing for the Placement of Intra-Abdominal Mesh after Incidental Enterotomy in a Rodent Model (Rattus norvegicus).

Controversy exists regarding the appropriate timing for placement of permanent intra-abdominal mesh after inadvertent enterotomy during elective hernia repair. The aim of this study was to examine mesh placement at variable postoperative periods and the subsequent risk of infection. Fifty rodents were divided into five groups. Groups one to four underwent laparotomy, enterotomy, and repair. Physiomesh® was placed at the index operation one, three, or seven days postoperatively in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4. Group 5 underwent mesh placement only. Necropsy with mesh harvest was performed seven days after placement. Cultures of mesh were obtained and Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups. Bacterial growth postsonication was identified in 30, 30, 50, and 90 per cent versus 20 per cent in controls. Compared with controls, there was significantly increased risk of mesh infection when it was placed seven days after enterotomy (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in bacterial growth when mesh was placed at the time of enterotomy, one or three days later. The risk of bacterial contamination of permanent mesh placed immediately after inadvertent enterotomy during elective hernia repair is as safe as placing mesh at one or three days. Placing mesh at seven days significantly increased the risk of mesh contamination.