RESUMEN
BackgroundRevascularisation of patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia due to arterial lesions in the below the knee segment can be challenging. This study describes a novel technique that allows a complete endovascular reconstruction of the trifurcation (CERT) utilising stents in the below the knee segment when conventional techniques are exhausted, or have failed to deliver an acceptable result, leading to remaining outflow compromise. Methods: Eight patients with Rutherford 5 chronic limb threatening ischaemia underwent CERT between January 1st, 2018 and January 1st, 2020. All patients underwent ultrasound at 6 weeks post operatively and then at variable intervals until the completion of the follow up period in March 2020. Results: Technical success of the CERT technique was achieved in all patients. Six patients had anterior tibial artery/Tibioperoneal trunk reconstructions, whilst 2 patients were stented directly into posterior tibial and peroneal artery. Five patients (63%) achieved wound healing. All-cause mortality was 25% (2 patients) with 1 patient achieving wound healing prior to death. Two stents were occluded during the follow up period. The first was asymptomatic and had achieved wound healing. The second was symptomatic with stent occlusion and a delayed presentation with Rutherford 3 acute limb ischaemia. Conclusions: Complete endovascular reconstruction of the trifurcation is a feasible option to achieve revascularisation in patients with tissue loss and below the knee arterial lesions allowing a continuous reconstruction of the trifurcation segment keeping the anatomical configuration intact. Clinical outcomes appear acceptable however larger series are needed.
RESUMEN
Esophageal foreign bodies are common conditions that may lead to serious complications, such as esophageal perforation, neck abscess, mediastinitis, arterial injury, and lung damage. We report a rare case of esophageal fish bone impingement on the aorta that was managed without complication by endoscopic removal.
RESUMEN
Uterine arteriovenous malformation (UAVM) is a rare condition and is classified as either congenital or acquired UAVM. Patients with UAVMs usually experience miscarriages or recurrent menorrhagia. Ultrasound is used for the initial estimation of UAVMs. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are noninvasive and valuable methods that provide good compatibility with digital subtraction angiography to support the diagnosis and treatment of UAVM. Timely diagnosis is crucial to provide appropriate treatment for alleviating complications. This article presents a pictorial and literature review of the current evidence of the diagnosis and management of UAVM.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas , Anomalías Urogenitales , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Útero/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With growing global prevalence of diabetes mellitus, diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) is contributing significantly to disease burden. As more healthcare resources are being dedicated to the management of DFD, service design and delivery is being scrutinised. Through a national survey, this study aimed to investigate the current characteristics of services which treat patients with DFD in Australia. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all 195 Australian members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery investigating aspects of DFD management in each member's institution. RESULTS: From the survey, 52 responses were received (26.7%). A multidisciplinary diabetes foot unit (MDFU) was available in more than half of respondent's institutions, most of which were tertiary hospitals. The common components of MDFU were identified as podiatrists, endocrinologists, vascular surgeons and infectious disease physicians. Many respondents identified vascular surgery as being the primary admitting specialty for DFD patients that require hospitalisation (33/52, 63.5%). This finding was consistent even in centres with MDFU clinics. Less than one third of MDFUs had independent admission rights. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that many tertiary centres in Australia provide their diabetic foot service in a multidisciplinary environment however their composition and function remain heterogeneous. These findings provide an opportunity to evaluate current practice and, to initiate strategies aimed to improve outcomes of patients with DFD.