Cross-sectional study to assess the psychological morbidity of women facing possible miscarriage.

INTRODUCTION: Threatened miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy. This study aimed to assess psychological morbidity in women with threatened miscarriage, with the goal of identifying early interventions for women at risk of anxiety or depression. METHODS: Women in their first trimester attending an Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic were recruited between July 2013 and June 2015. They were asked to complete the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Spielberger's State Anxiety Inventory State form (STAI-S), the Fatigue Scale-14 (FS-14), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) before consultation. They were also asked to rate anxiety levels before and after consultation using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: In total, 1390 women completed the study. The mean ± standard deviation of GHQ-12 (bi-modal) and GHQ-12 (Likert) scores were 4.04 ± 3.17 and 15.19 ± 5.30, respectively. Among these women, 48.4% had a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 and 76.7% had a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, indicating distress. The mean ± standard deviation of BDI, STAI-S, and FS-14 scores were 9.35 ± 7.19, 53.81 ± 10.95, and 2.40 ± 0.51, respectively. The VAS score significantly decreased after consultation (P<0.001). Compared with women without a history of miscarriage, women with a previous miscarriage had higher GHQ-12, BDI, and POMS scores (except for fatigue-inertia and vigour-activity subscales). A higher bleeding score was strongly positively correlated with GHQ-12 (Likert) score. There were weak correlations between pain score and the GHQ-12 (bi-modal) ≥4, BDI >12, and POMS scores (except for confusion-bewilderment subscale which showed a strong positive correlation). CONCLUSION: Women with threatened miscarriage experience a considerable psychological burden, emphasising the importance of early recognition for timely management.

Intermediate- to long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh for treatment of Asian women with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION: Short-term follow-up analyses suggest that transvaginal mesh has limited application for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treatment. This study evaluated the intermediate- and long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included all women who underwent transvaginal mesh surgery in one urogynaecology centre. Inclusion criteria were women with stage III/IV POP, age ≥65 years, and (preferably) sexual inactivity. Concomitant sacrospinous fixation and mid-urethral slings were offered for stage III/IV apical POP and urodynamic stress incontinence, respectively. Women were followed up for 5 years. Subjective recurrence was defined as reported prolapse symptoms. Objective recurrence was defined as stage II prolapse or above. Mesh complications and patient satisfaction were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 183 women who underwent transvaginal mesh surgery, 156 had ≥1 year of follow-up (mean, 50 ± 22 months). Subjective and objective recurrence rates were 5.1% and 10.9%, respectively. The mesh erosion rate was 9.6%; all affected women received local oestrogen treatment or bedside surgical excision. Three women received transobturator tension-free transvaginal tape for de novo (n=1) or preoperative urodynamic stress incontinence who did not undergo concomitant surgery (n=2); 14% of the women had de novo urgency urinary incontinence. No women reported chronic pain. Overall, 98% were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with the operation. CONCLUSION: During 50 months of follow-up, transvaginal mesh surgery for stage III/IV POP had low subjective and objective recurrence rates. The total re-operation rate was 9.6%. Most women were satisfied with the operation. Based on the risk-benefit profile, transvaginal mesh surgery may be suitable for women who have advanced POP.

Women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and levator ani muscle avulsion would significantly benefit from mesh repair surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Mesh repair surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been suspended in some countries owing to concerns about its associated complications. However, mesh repair has been shown to reduce the risk of prolapse recurrence after surgery. In view of this controversy, our aim was to assess the incidence of subjective and objective recurrence of POP following mesh repair surgery vs native-tissue repair in women with Stage-III or Stage-IV POP. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of women who presented with Stage-III or Stage-IV POP and received primary prolapse surgery between 2013 and 2018. Transperineal ultrasound was performed before the operation and volumes were analyzed offline to assess the presence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion. All women were counseled on either mesh repair or native-tissue reconstruction. The mesh-repair group was followed up for up to 5 years and the native-tissue-repair group for up to 2 years after the operation. Prolapse symptoms and POP quantification (POP-Q) staging were assessed at follow-up. Subjective recurrence of POP was defined as symptoms of prolapse (vaginal bulge sensation or dragging sensation) reported by the patient. Objective recurrence was defined as POP-Q ≥ Stage II. The subjective and objective recurrences of prolapse were compared between women with and those without mesh use. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for the recurrence of POP. RESULTS: A total of 154 Chinese women with Stage-III or Stage-IV prolapse were recruited. Of these, 104 (67.5%) underwent mesh repair (transabdominal in 57 women and transvaginal in 47 women) and 50 (32.5%) had native-tissue repair surgery. Ninety-five (61.7%) women had LAM avulsion. Both the subjective POP recurrence rate (4.8% vs 20.0%; P = 0.003) and the objective recurrence rate (20.2% vs 46.0%; P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the mesh-repair group than in the native-tissue-repair group. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, mesh repair was associated significantly with a reduced risk of subjective recurrence (odds ratio (OR), 0.20 (95% CI, 0.07-0.63)) and of objective recurrence (OR, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.55)) of prolapse. On subgroup analysis of women with LAM avulsion, mesh repair significantly reduced the risk of subjective recurrence (OR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.07-0.87)) and objective recurrence (OR, 0.23 (95% CI, 0.09-0.57)) of POP. The incidence of mesh-related complications was low, and mesh exposure could be treated conservatively or by minor surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh repair surgery, compared with native-tissue repair, was associated with a 5-fold reduction in the risk of subjective recurrence and a 6-fold reduction in the risk of objective recurrence of prolapse in women with Stage-III or Stage-IV POP. In women with concomitant LAM avulsion, mesh repair surgery was associated with a 4-fold reduction in both objective and subjective recurrence of POP. The rate of mesh-related complications was low, and mesh exposure could be treated conservatively or by minor surgery. The benefit of mesh surgery for these high-risk women appears to outweigh the risks of mesh complications, and it could be a treatment option for this group of women. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

External validation of a simple scoring system to predict pregnancy viability in women presenting to an early pregnancy assessment clinic.

INTRODUCTION: A scoring system combining clinical history and simple ultrasound parameters was developed to predict early pregnancy viability beyond the first trimester. The scoring system has not yet been externally validated. This study aimed to externally validate this scoring system to predict ongoing pregnancy viability beyond the first trimester. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled women with singleton intrauterine pregnancies before 12 weeks of gestation. Women underwent examination and ultrasound scan to assess gestational sac size, yolk sac size, and fetal pulsation status. A pregnancy-specific viability score was derived in accordance with the Bottomley score. Pregnancy outcomes at 13 to 16 weeks were documented. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the discriminatory performance of the scoring system. RESULTS: In total, 1508 women were enrolled; 1271 were eligible for analysis. After adjustment for covariates, miscarriage (13%) was significantly associated with age ≥35 years (odds ratio [OR]=1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-3.34), higher bleeding score (OR=2.34, 95% CI: 1.25-4.38), gestational age (OR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.13-1.22), absence of yolk sac (OR=4.73, 95% CI: 2.11-10.62), absence of fetal heart pulsation (OR=3.57, 95% CI: 1.87-6.84), mean yolk sac size (OR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.47), and fetal size (OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.77-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93). Viability score of ≥1 corresponded to a >90% probability of viable pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system was easy to use. A score of ≥1 could be used to counsel women who have a high likelihood of viable pregnancy beyond the first trimester.

Prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery in primiparous women: a retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) may be underdetected in primiparous women. This study evaluated the prevalence of OASIS in primiparous women after normal vaginal delivery or instrumental delivery using endoanal ultrasound (US) during postnatal follow-up. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed endoanal US data collected during postnatal follow-up (6-12 months after vaginal delivery) at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Offline analysis to determine the prevalence of OASIS was performed by two researchers who were blinded to the clinical diagnosis. Symptoms of faecal and flatal incontinence were assessed with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. RESULTS: Of 542 women included in the study, 205 had normal vaginal delivery and 337 had instrumental delivery. The prevalence of OASIS detected by endoanal US was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=4.1%-11.5%) in the normal vaginal delivery group and 5.6% (95% CI=3.1%-8.1%) in the instrumental delivery group. Overall, 82.9% of women with OASIS on endoanal US did not show clinical signs of OASIS. Birth weight was significantly higher in the OASIS group (P=0.012). At 6 to 12 months after delivery, 5.5% of women reported faecal incontinence and 17.9% reported flatal incontinence, but OASIS was not associated with these symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Additional training for midwives and doctors may improve OASIS detection.

Mesh-related complications from reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in Chinese patients in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: Mesh-related complications from reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse are of international concern. The present study aimed to review the incidence, management, and surgical outcomes of mesh-related complications in a Chinese population compared with existing studies involving Western populations. METHODS: This was an analysis of a prospectively collected cohort. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic hystercolposacropexy, or transvaginal mesh surgery were offered with or without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy or continence surgery. Patients were followed up and mesh-related complications were noted. RESULTS: Overall, 276 Chinese women who received mesh surgery were included for data analysis. There were 22 mesh-related complications found during a mean follow-up period of 40 months. Mesh exposure accounted for 20 these complications; significantly more occurred after transvaginal than after abdominal mesh surgery (16 vs 4; P=0.01). Median duration from primary operation to the time of mesh exposure detection was 12 months (interquartile range=4.8-32.8 months). Ten patients required surgical excisions of exposed mesh. The re-operation rate after mesh complications was 6.7% (9/134) for transvaginal mesh surgery and 1.4% (2/142) for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (P=0.03). All excisions were performed transvaginally and 95% remained well after surgery. Occurrence of mesh exposure was higher in transvaginal mesh surgery (adjusted odds ratio=6.1; P=0.008), in sexually active patients (adjusted odds ratio=5.4; P=0.002), and in obese patients (adjusted odds ratio=3.7; P=0.046). Over 90% were satisfied with the outcome, regardless of mesh complications. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of mesh exposure and re-operation were consistent with those reported in the literature, suggesting no significant differences in outcome between Chinese and Western patients for this type of surgery.

Prevalence of levator ani muscle injury and health-related quality of life in primiparous Chinese women after instrumental delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Levator ani muscle (LAM) injury is common after first vaginal delivery, and a higher incidence is associated with instrumental delivery. This study was conducted to compare the incidence of LAM injury after forceps or ventouse extraction in primiparous Chinese women, and to study their subsequent health-related quality of life. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted between 1 September 2011 and 31 May 2012 in a tertiary obstetric unit. All eligible primiparous women who had undergone instrumental delivery were recruited 1 to 3 days following delivery. The subjects completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaire and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and translabial ultrasound was performed 8 weeks' postpartum to determine whether the subjects had suffered LAM injury. RESULTS: Among the 289 women who completed the study, 247 (85.5%) had ventouse extraction and 42 (14.5%) had forceps delivery. Subsequent translabial ultrasound identified a total of 58 women with LAM injury. The prevalence of LAM injury after ventouse extraction and forceps delivery was 16.6% (95% CI, 12.0-21.2%) (41/247) and 40.5% (95% CI, 25.6-55.4%) (17/42), respectively (P = 0.001). Forceps delivery was identified as a risk factor for LAM injury, with an odds ratio of 3.54. No statistically significant differences were observed between the quality of life in women who underwent ventouse extraction and those with forceps delivery or between the quality of life in women with a unilateral or bilateral LAM injury. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of primiparous Chinese women, 20.1% (58/289) had LAM injury after instrumental delivery, and forceps delivery was identified as the only risk factor.