Povidone-iodine irrigation reduces infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: One of the most important challenges faced by orthopedic surgeons is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJI is a common cause for total joint arthroplasty failure with an incidence of 0.3-1.9%. PJI can be devastating for the patient and extremely costly for the healthcare system. There is concern that a major cause of PJI is intra-operative colonization and recent studies have shown a decrease in PJI with the use of dilute povidone-iodine (Betadine®, Avrio Health L.P, Stamford, CT) irrigation prior to wound closure. This study presents our experience with the use of dilute Betadine® irrigation prior to wound closure and its effect on our post-operative hip and knee arthroplasty acute infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review performed at our hospital looking at PJI amongst patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2013 and 2017 comparing different irrigation methods (n = 3232). The study group (n = 1207) underwent irrigation prior to wound closure with dilute Betadine for 3 min and the control group (n = 1511) underwent irrigation using normal saline (NS). RESULTS: Using a logistic regression model where the following variables were adjusted for; ASA, age, sex, foley insertion, surgical duration and diabetes mellitus status a statistical significant reduction was seen in any infection (OR 0.45 [0.22; 0.89], p value < 0.05) and SSI (OR 0.30 [0.13; 0.70], p value 0.01) with the Betadine group. No significant reduction was seen with deep infections with the Betadine group compared to the NS group. CONCLUSION: PJI is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty and we found Betadine compared to NS irrigation provides an inexpensive and simple method to lower any PJI and more specifically SSI in THA and TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Effect of Femoral and Acetabular Version on Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Torsional hip deformities are common among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, recent studies have suggested conflicting outcomes following arthroscopy in the setting of abnormal hip version. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the literature and determine the impact of femoral and acetabular version on patient-reported outcomes following primary arthroscopic hip surgery. METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies investigating femoral and acetabular version in primary hip arthroscopy with clinical outcomes were identified, and data were extracted in duplicate. RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies met inclusion criteria and comprised 1,297 hips (726 femora and 571 acetabulae), with a mean patient age of 29.2 years (range, 14 to 74.7 years). In patients with acetabular retroversion, there was no significant difference, when compared with the normal acetabular version group, in the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), the Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores postoperatively. Among patients with femoral retroversion, in 2 of 3 studies, the authors reported no difference in mHHS postoperatively compared with patients with normal femoral version. In patients with high femoral anteversion, in 2 of 3 studies, the authors reported a significant difference in postoperative mHHS favoring patients with normal femoral version. Studies examining high femoral anteversion included patients with borderline hip dysplasia and patients who underwent concurrent psoas-lengthening procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the definition of the normal version of the hip varied within the literature, hip arthroscopy in patients with acetabular retroversion resulted in no difference in functional outcomes compared with patients with normal version. Postoperative functional outcomes in patients with femoral retroversion and high femoral anteversion were mixed, although the procedure was possibly less effective in high femoral anteversion combined with specific clinical scenarios. Further prospective studies based on standardized definitions and version analysis techniques would be useful in identifying the precise surgical indications for safe arthroscopic surgical procedures in patients with version abnormalities of the femur and acetabulum, particularly those with high femoral anteversion and retroversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An Extraosseous Aneurysmal Bone Cyst in a 59-Year-Old Man: A Case Report.

CASE: A 59-year-old man presented with a history of a painful, rapidly growing mass on the anteromedial aspect of his thigh. On examination, he had a mobile, hard, and nontender mass. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-encapsulated, heterogeneous mass with high-intensity internal septations. Blood-filled spaces were observed within the mass with no involvement of the underlying normal bony structures. The mass was excised, and the diagnosis of an extraosseous aneurysmal bone cyst was confirmed histologically. CONCLUSIONS: Extraosseous aneurysmal bone cysts are rare benign lesions that can mimic malignant tumors. Careful clinical and pathological assessment should be performed in such cases.

Acute Thigh Compartment Syndrome due to an Occult Arterial Injury Following a Blunt Trauma: A Case Report.

CASE: We report a 27-year-old man who presented with thigh swelling and inability to bear weight after blunt trauma 24 hours before. Based on the clinical assessment, the patient was diagnosed with anterior compartment syndrome of the thigh and underwent fasciotomy. Postoperatively, 1.5 L of blood were drained from his wound in the first 30 minutes after the operation. Angiography was performed demonstrating bleeding from the lateral femoral circumflex which was successfully embolized. CONCLUSIONS: Our case represents the underlying arterial injury that was initially undiagnosed as a cause for thigh compartment syndrome. Physicians should consider associated injuries (beyond muscle crush) when making a diagnosis of compartment syndrome.

Knee Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Lipoma Arborescens: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Lipoma arborescens is a rare, intra-articular benign lesion characterized by hyperplastic formation of villous projections that commonly presents as nonspecific mechanical knee pain. The treatment of choice for lipoma arborescens of the knee is open or arthroscopic synovectomy. However, data are lacking on the success of arthroscopic treatment, despite its increasingly widespread use. We aimed to systemically review the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of lipoma arborescens. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched by 2 reviewers independently on October 9, 2018, and all relevant articles in the English and French languages up to and including that date were considered. The search terms "lipoma arborescens," "knee," "arthroscopy," and "arthroscopic" were used. Articles were screened on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: Among the 110 initial studies that were retrieved, 28 satisfied the inclusion criteria. A total of 71 knees in 65 patients ranging from 13 to 78 years of age underwent arthroscopic synovectomy for the treatment of lipoma arborescens. The duration of follow-up ranged from 3 weeks to 84 months. The recurrence rate was 2.8%, and 2 patients underwent conversion to open surgery. One patient had postoperative hematoma that required evacuation, and another patient reported persistent residual pain at the time of the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this uncontrolled, systematic review, arthroscopic synovectomy is a safe and effective treatment for lipoma arborescens of the knee, with a success rate of >95%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early results of a modified biological valved conduit for the Bentall procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Few bioprosthetic valved conduits for aortic root surgery are commercially available. Long-term Warfarin therapy (mechanical), potential root calcification (xeno- or homograft valves), and the need for additional ascending aorta grafts are concerns associated with currently used valved conduits. A simplified, self-assembled bioroot conduit comprising currently available materials that facilitates future intervention and exhibits advantages of a bioprosthesis was used. METHODS: From November 2015 to January 2017, 17 consecutive patients underwent urgent or elective aortic root surgery. A bioroot conduit, constructed using 28 or 30 mm of sinus of Valsalva Gelweave tube graft and a 3 to 5 mm smaller bioprosthetic Trifecta valve sewn into the sinus of Valsalva base, was preconstructed in the operating room before sternotomy. The size of the valved conduit was based on the distal ascending aorta or proximal arch and not aortic annular dimension. The bioroot was sutured to the native aortic annulus at the level of the bottom skirt of the Valsalva graft without contacting the sewing cuff of the bioprosthetic valve. RESULTS: All patients survived the operation and were discharged home without long-term anticoagulation therapy. The mean age was 65 ± 12 years, and 13 patients were male. The cardiopulmonary bypass duration was 169 ± 84 minutes, and the cross-clamp (XC) duration was 110 ± 32 minutes. The operation was elective in 12 patients, urgent/emergent in five, and redo in three. CONCLUSION: A simplified self-assembled bioroot Bentall conduit is appropriate for aortic root reconstruction. Use of a patient-tailored valved conduit will not prolong the cardiac ischemic time and will facilitate future valve replacement.