RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Upper limb (UL) disability in people with UL amputation/s is well reported in the literature, less so for people with lower limb amputation/s. This study aimed to compare UL disability in injured (major trauma) and uninjured UK military personnel, with particular focus on people with upper and lower limb amputation/s. METHODS: A volunteer sample of injured (n = 579) and uninjured (n = 566) UK military personnel who served in a combat role in the Afghanistan war were frequency matched on age, sex, service, rank, regiment, role, and deployment period and recruited to the Armed Services Trauma Rehabilitation Outcome (ADVANCE) longitudinal cohort study. Participants completed the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, scored from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximum disability) 8 years postinjury. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compared DASH scores between groups. An ordinal model was used to assess the effect of injury and amputation on DASH scores. RESULTS: DASH scores were higher in the group with injuries compared to the group without injuries (3.33 vs 0.00) and higher in people with lower limb loss compared to the group without injuries (0.83 vs 0.00), although this was not statistically significant. In the adjusted ordinal model, the odds of having a higher DASH score was 1.70 (95% CI = 1.18-2.47) times higher for people with lower limb loss compared to the group without injuries. DASH score was not significantly different between people with major and partial UL loss (15.42 vs 12.92). The odds of having a higher DASH score was 8.30 (95% CI = 5.07-13.60) times higher for people with UL loss compared to the uninjured group. CONCLUSION: People with lower limb loss have increased odds of having more UL disability than the uninjured population 8 years postinjury. People with major and partial UL loss have similar UL disability. The ADVANCE study will continue to follow this population for the next 20 years. IMPACT: For the first time, potential for greater upper limb disability has been shown in people with lower limb loss long-term, likely resulting from daily biomechanical compensations such as weight-bearing, balance, and power generation. This population may benefit from prophylactic upper limb rehabilitation, strength, and technique.