Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Epidemiol ; 24(5): 325-32, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636615

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although prior research focused primarily on student-on-student school violence, educators are also at risk. This study was designed to identify risk factors for assaults against educators. METHODS: Kindergarten-grade 12 educators (n = 26,000), randomly selected from a state license database, were screened for eligibility (6,469, eligible) by mailed questionnaire. Phase 1 (12-month recall) identified eligible assault cases (n = 372) and controls (n = 1,116), June 2004 to December 2005; phase 2 (case-control study; response, 78%) enabled identification of exposures through 1-month recall before student-perpetrated assaults (cases) and randomly selected months (controls). Directed acyclic graphs enabled confounder selection for multivariable logistic regression analyses; reweighting adjusted for potential biases. RESULTS: Risks (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals) increased for working in: Special Education (5.84; 4.07-8.39) and School Social Work (7.18; 2.72-18.91); kindergarten to second grade (1.81; 1.18-2.77); urban (1.95; 1.38-2.76) schools; schools with less than 50 (8.40; 3.12-22.63), 50-200 (3.67; 1.84-7.34), 201-500 (2.09; 1.32-3.29), and 501-1000 (1.94; 1.25-3.01) students versus more than 1000; schools with inadequate resources always/frequently (1.62; 1.05-2.48) versus infrequently/never; inadequate building safety always/frequently (4.48; 2.54-7.90) versus infrequently/never; and environments with physical barriers (1.50; 1.07-2.10). Risks decreased with routine locker searches (0.49; 0.29-0.85) and accessible exits (0.36; 0.17-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of assault risk factors provides a basis for further investigation and interventions.


Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 53(3): 294-302, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21346637

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Identify the magnitude and risk factors for occupational physical assault (PA) and nonphysical violence (NPV) against Minnesota educators. METHODS: Among 26,000 randomly selected licensed kindergarten to grade 12 educators, 6469 eligible educators reported whether they experienced PA or NPV during the prior year. Multiple logistic regression models were based on directed acyclic graphs. RESULTS: Respective PA and NPV annual rates per 100 educators were 8.3 and 38.4. Work changes resulted among PA (13% to 20%) and NPV (22%) victims. Risks increased for master's prepared or education specialists who worked in public alternative schools and special education. Risks decreased for those working for more than 20 years, part time, and in private schools. Physical assault risk decreased when teaching grades 3 to 12 (vs kindergarten to grade 2), but NPV risk increased. CONCLUSION: Targeted efforts on specific violence risk and protective factors are essential to improve educators' work environments.


Asunto(s)
Docentes , Instituciones Académicas , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
J Prof Nurs ; 23(5): 290-300, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17903788

RESUMEN

Nurses are at considerable risk for work-related violence. This study compared the experiences of work-related violence among registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) to quantify differences in risks and exposures and to gain insight into possible interventions. A random sample (n = 6,300) of licensed Minnesota nurses was surveyed regarding the previous 12-month period. Nurses self-reported violent events and demographic information. After adjustment for potential confounders and nonresponse, LPNs had an increased risk for both physical assault (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-1.9) and nonphysical violence (odds ratio = 1.2; 95% confidence interval = 1.0-1.5) compared to RNs. Some exposures resulted in increased risks for both types of violence for RNs and LPNs: working primarily in psychiatric departments and long-term care facilities. In contrast, working in clinics resulted in decreased risks for both license types. Some risks varied by license type. Risk of physical assault was increased for LPNs working with neonatal/pediatric patients, whereas RNs' risk was decreased. RNs' risk of physical violence increased while providing care, whereas LPNs' risk increased while supervising care. A better understanding of how this problem varies by license type and work setting will assist in designing efficacious interventions.


Asunto(s)
Licencia en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Práctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Causalidad , Femenino , Ambiente de Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota/epidemiología , Análisis Multivariante , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería/educación , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Enfermería Práctica/educación , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Acoso Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Social , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Violencia/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología
4.
Epidemiology ; 16(5): 704-9, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16135952

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Work-related homicides have been the subject of considerable study, but little is known about nonfatal violence and relevant risk factors. METHODS: We surveyed 6300 Minnesota nurses who were selected randomly from the 1998 licensing database and determined their employment and occupational violence experience. In a nested case-control study, we examined environmental exposures and physical assault. Cases of assault in the previous 12 months and controls randomly selected from assault-free months were surveyed about prior-month exposures. RESULTS: After adjustment by multiple logistic regression, incidence of physical assault was 13.2 per 100 persons per year (95% confidence interval = 12.2-14.3). Among 310 cases and 946 control subjects, odds ratios for assault were increased: in nursing homes or long-term care facilities (2.6; 1.9-3.6), emergency departments (4.2; 1.3-12.8), and psychiatric departments (2.0; 1.1-3.7); in environments not "bright as daylight" (2.2; 1.6-2.8); and for each additional hour of shift duration (1.05; 0.99-1.11). Risks were decreased when carrying cellular telephones or personal alarms (0.3; 0.2-0.7). CONCLUSIONS: These results may guide in-depth investigation of ways protective and risk factors can control violence against nurses.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota/epidemiología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Lugar de Trabajo
5.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 96(10): 770-80, 2004 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15150305

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer screening by using a fecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or barium enema x-ray reduces the incidence of and death from colorectal cancer, the rate of colorectal cancer screening in the general population is low. We conducted a randomized trial consisting of direct mailing of FOBT kits to increase colorectal cancer screening among residents of Wright County, Minnesota, a community in which colorectal cancer screening was promoted. METHODS: At baseline, we mailed a questionnaire about colorectal cancer screening to a random sample of Wright County residents aged 50 years or older who were randomly selected from the Minnesota State Driver's License and Identification Card database (estimated N = 1451). The sample was randomly allocated into three equal subgroups: one group (control) received only the questionnaire, one group received FOBT kits by direct mail with reminders, and one group received FOBT kits by direct mail without reminders. Study participants were sent a follow-up questionnaire 1 year after baseline. We used the responses to the questionnaires to estimate the 1-year change in self-reported screening rates in each group and the differences in the changes among the groups, along with the associated bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: At baseline, the estimated response rate was 86.5%, self-reported adherence to FOBT guidelines was 21.5%, and overall adherence to any colorectal cancer screening test guidelines was 55.8%. The 1-year rate changes in absolute percentage for self-reported adherence to FOBT use were 1.5% (95% CI = -2.9% to 5.9%) for the control group, 16.9% (95% CI = 11.5% to 22.3%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-no-reminders group, and 23.2% (95% CI = 17.2% to 29.3%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-reminders group. The 1-year rate changes for self-reported adherence to any colorectal cancer screening test were 7.8% (95% CI = 3.2% to 12.0%) for the control group, 13.2% (95% CI = 8.4% to 18.2%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-no-reminders group, and 14.1% (95% CI = 9.1% to 19.1%) for the direct-mail-FOBT-with-reminders group. CONCLUSION: Direct mailing of FOBT kits combined with follow-up reminders promotes more rapid increases in the use of FOBT and nearly doubles the increase in overall rate of adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines in a general population compared with a community-wide screening promotion and awareness campaign.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sangre Oculta , Servicios Postales , Anciano , Sulfato de Bario , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Enema/estadística & datos numéricos , Heces , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 13(4): 654-7, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15066933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This article describes the self-reported colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence rates of adults, aged 50 years and older, living in five nonurban Minnesota counties. METHODS: During the year 2000, 1693 eligible respondents, aged 50 years and older, from a randomly selected sample completed a survey assessing CRC screening adherence (approximately 86.3% response). The survey allowed differentiation between the four CRC screening modalities but did not differentiate between screening and diagnostic testing. Adjustment for nonresponse was performed using a version of Horvitz-Thompson weighting accounting for unknown eligibility. RESULTS: 24.5% of respondents had a fecal occult blood test within 1 year of the survey, 33.8% had flexible sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, 29.3% had a colonoscopy within 10 years, and 13.7% had a barium enema within the last 5 years. Overall, 55.3% of respondents reported testing by any modality; thus, 44.7% were not adherent to screening guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study improves on previous attempts to characterize CRC screening adherence by assessing all four modalities of screening as recommended by current screening guidelines, by focusing on nonadherence, and by rigorously accounting for nonresponse. This study confirms that nearly half of the population remains unscreened by any method.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Bario , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota/epidemiología , Sangre Oculta , Sigmoidoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...