Changes in parental anxiety and intention to demand antibiotics: A longitudinal study among parents during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS: Assessing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on parental anxiety and preferences for antibiotic treatment can help inform antibiotic stewardship strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to examine COVID-19 pandemic-related changes in parental anxiety levels, their intentions to demand antibiotics and frequencies of practising preventative behaviours. DESIGN: This longitudinal quantitative study compared two groups of parents, those from Victoria and Western Australia, who experienced high and low COVID-19 risk, respectively. METHODS: Participants were recruited through an online panel to complete three waves of surveys between October 2020 and August 2021. Anxiety scores and frequency of preventative behaviours were analysed using mixed-effects tobit regression, considering time, state, and their interaction as fixed effects predictors. Intention to demand antibiotics was modelled using multinomial logistic regression, with time, state, and their interaction as the predictors. RESULTS: The final longitudinal sample comprised 50 participants from Victoria and 51 from Western Australia. Parental anxiety did not significantly change over time for either state. Intention to demand antibiotics was also stable over time within each state; however, participants from Victoria exhibited stronger intentions to demand antibiotics compared to those from Western Australia. Frequencies of parental preventative behaviours declined from Wave 1 to Wave 2 before increasing again in Wave 3, but only for Western Australia. CONCLUSION: This longitudinal study among Australian parents found stable parental anxiety and intention to demand antibiotics within each state. However, the intention to demand antibiotics and preventative behaviours varied between states as per the COVID-19 risk. Thus, viral pandemics may not affect judicious antibiotic use, though the intention to demand antibiotics may increase in states with high COVID-19 risk. IMPACT: Though parental anxiety may not impact antibiotic stewardship during viral respiratory illness outbreaks, tailored messaging to maintain appropriate antibiotic use may be necessary, especially when the disease risk is high.

Does antibiotic awareness campaigns exposure decrease intention to demand antibiotic treatment? Testing a structural model among parents in Western Australia.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the key public health concerns the world is facing today. The effect of antibiotic awareness campaigns (AACs) on consumer behaviour has been documented in the literature with mixed results. Understanding the mechanism for how AACs affect target populations is vital in designing effective and tailored campaigns. Using structural equation modelling our study examined the relationships among people's exposure to antibiotic awareness campaigns, knowledge of AMR prevention, AMR risk perception, and intention to seek antibiotic treatment. This study also tested the moderating effect of anxiety and societal responsibility on preventing AMR, and on their intention to demand antibiotic treatment mediated by knowledge of AMR prevention and risk-perception. Primary data was generated using an online survey of 250 Western Australian parents. We tested our hypotheses using reliability and validity tests and structural equation modelling. Our results show that exposure to AACs alone may not be enough to change parental intention to demand antibiotic prescription for their children. Parental risk perception of AMR and parental anxiety affect intention to demand antibiotics, and the view that AMR is a social responsibility has a moderating effect on intention to demand antibiotics. These factors could be considered and combine messaging strategies in designing future antibiotic awareness campaigns.

Opportunities to Improve Awareness of Antimicrobial Resistance Through Social Marketing: A Systematic Review of Interventions Targeting Parents and Children.

Lack of knowledge from parents concerning the appropriate use of antimicrobials leads to poor treatment choices and mismanagement of antimicrobials for their children. Social marketing (SM) strategies have the potential to help parents access useful information on the appropriate use of antimicrobials. Still, its application in interventions targeting antimicrobial/antibiotic resistance awareness is minimal. This study explores the use of SM in antimicrobial/antibiotic awareness campaigns (AACs) to identify opportunities for SM approaches in developing future communication interventions targeting parents and children. We conduct a systematic review of interventions targeting parents and children between 2000 and 2022. Articles meeting the selection criteria were assessed against social marketing benchmark criteria (SMBC). We identified 6978 original records, 16 of which were included in the final review. None of the articles explicitly identified SM as part of their interventions. Twelve interventions (75%) included 1 to 4 (out of 8) benchmark criteria, while four (25%) had 5-8 benchmarks in their interventions. Of the interventions with less than four benchmark criteria, six studies (50%) reported a positive effect direction outcome, and six studies (50%) reported negative/no change direction on the outcome of interests. Meanwhile, all interventions with five or more SMBC resulted in a positive effect direction in their outcomes. In this review, the use of SM has shown promising results, indicating opportunities for future antimicrobial resistance (AMR) interventions that incorporate social marketing benchmark criteria to improve intervention outcomes.

Identifying Patients With Cirrhosis Who Might Avoid Screening Endoscopy Based on Serum Albumin and Bilirubin and Platelet Counts.

The presence of gastroesophageal varices is a major complication of portal hypertension associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1 The Baveno VI criteria state that patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) <20 kPa by transient elastography (TE) and platelet count >150,000/µL can avoid screening endoscopy for high-risk varix (HRV).2 However, because TE is not widely available, the Baveno VI criteria could not be applied in many clinical settings. As such, we aim to determine a concise clinical criterion as an alternative noninvasive tool to predict absence of HRV among patients with compensated cirrhosis to avoid screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

Durability of glycaemic control with dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared with saxagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Dapagliflozin is associated with greater reductions in HbA1c and weight than saxagliptin in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present post hoc analyses compared the durability of these effects over short- and long-term follow-up in patients with T2DM who were inadequately controlled with metformin (≥1500 mg/day) and who were receiving either dapagliflozin (10 mg/day) or saxagliptin (5 mg/day). Failure of glycaemiccontrol was assessed using the slope of the change in HbA1c from baseline-over-time regression line (coefficient of failure [CoF]). CoF was compared directly (dapagliflozin vs saxagliptin) over the short term (NCT01606007, 24 weeks) and indirectly (placebo-adjusted) over the long term (NCT00528879 and NCT00121667, 102 weeks). A low CoF value indicated greater durability. CoF was lower for dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin over 18-24 weeks (-1.38%/year; 95% CI, -2.41 to -0.35; P = .009) and 20-102 weeks (-0.37%/year; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.02; P = .04). Fewer dapagliflozin-treated patients versus saxagliptin-treated patients required rescue medication or discontinued the study because of failure to achieve glycaemic control at 24 weeks (3.4% vs 9.4%; P = .0191). In patients with T2DM who were inadequately controlled with metformin, dapagliflozin was associated with greater durability of glycaemic control than saxagliptin over 18-24 and 20-102 weeks.

Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either monotherapy (n = 1196 vs placebo), add-on therapy (n = 2139 vs placebo and n = 514 vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), or initial combination therapy (n = 619 vs control monotherapy). Patients with renal impairment received saxagliptin 2.5 mg/d or placebo (n = 164). RESULTS: Mean baseline glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ranged from 8.07% to 9.43% for the saxagliptin and control groups across treatment regimens. A1C reduction from baseline was greater with saxagliptin versus control for all studies combined (mean treatment difference [95% CI]: -0.55% [-0.63%, -0.47%]) and when used as monotherapy (-0.52% [-0.63, -0.40%]), add-on (-0.55% [-0.69%, -0.40%] vs placebo; -0.72% [-0.88%, -0.56%] vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), initial combination therapy (-0.54% [-0.73%, -0.35%] vs control monotherapy), and in patients with renal impairment (-0.42% [-0.75%, -0.09%]). Similar reductions in A1C versus control were noted for patients <65 years (-0.55% [-0.67%, -0.43%]) and ≥65 years (-0.54% [-0.69%, -0.38%]) and for men (-0.54% [-0.69%, -0.40%]) and women (-0.55% [-0.64%, -0.47%]) across treatment regimens. More patients achieved A1C <7% (39% vs 23%) and A1C ≤6.5% (24% vs 14%) with saxagliptin than with placebo or active-control treatment. Saxagliptin versus control was associated with a reduction in glucagon area under the curve (AUC) from baseline and increases in insulin AUC, C-peptide AUC, and the homeostasis model assessment of ß-cell function. CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis demonstrate the consistency of saxagliptin efficacy in different subgroups of patients with T2D across treatment regimens. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors may have a protective effect in diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied renal outcomes of 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes, randomized to saxagliptin versus placebo and followed for a median of 2.1 years in the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI 53) trial. RESULTS: At baseline, 9,696 (58.8%) subjects had normoalbuminuria (albumin/creatinine ratio [ACR] <30 mg/g), 4,426 (26.8%) had microalbuminuria (ACR 30-300 mg/g), and 1,638 (9.9%) had macroalbuminuria (ACR >300 mg/g). Treatment with saxagliptin was associated with improvement in and/or less deterioration in ACR categories from baseline to end of trial (EOT) (P = 0.021, P < 0.001, and P = 0.049 for individuals with baseline normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria, and macroalbuminuria, respectively). At 2 years, the difference in mean ACR change between saxagliptin and placebo arms was -19.3 mg/g (P = 0.033) for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >50 mL/min/body surface area per 1.73 m2 (BSA), -105 mg/g (P = 0.011) for 50 ≥ eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/BSA, and -245.2 mg/g (P = 0.086) for eGFR <30 mL/min/BSA. Analyzing ACR as a continuous variable showed reduction in ACR with saxagliptin (1 year, P < 0.0001; 2 years, P = 0.0143; and EOT, P = 0.0158). The change in ACR did not correlate with that in HbA1c (r = 0.041, 0.052, and 0.036; 1 year, 2 years, and EOT, respectively). The change in eGFR was similar in the saxagliptin and placebo groups. Safety renal outcomes, including doubling of serum creatinine, initiation of chronic dialysis, renal transplantation, or serum creatinine >6.0 mg/dL, were similar as well. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with saxagliptin improved ACR, even in the normoalbuminuric range, without affecting eGFR. The beneficial effect of saxagliptin on albuminuria could not be explained by its effect on glycemic control.

Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on ß-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin.

PURPOSE: The management of hyperglycemia is challenging in older patients with type 2 diabetes owing to excess fragility and risk for adverse outcomes should hypoglycemia episodes occur. We evaluated baseline ß-cell function as a potential risk factor for the development of hypoglycemia when saxagliptin or glimepiride was added in patients aged ≥65 years whose type 2 diabetes was poorly controlled on stable metformin monotherapy. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of data from the GENERATION (Efficacy and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared with Glimepiride in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Study) trial, which enrolled 720 patients aged ≥65 years, was conducted. ß-Cell function was assessed using homeostasis model assessment-2%ß (HOMA-2%ß). FINDINGS: The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5.8% vs 34.8%). Regardless of treatment, patients with lower (median HOMA-2%ß ≤39.1% [≤median]) versus higher (HOMA-2%ß above median value [>median]) baseline ß-cell function had a higher hypoglycemia event rate (1.27 vs 0.82 events/patient-year; adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.800; 95% CI, 1.501-2.159). In patients receiving glimepiride, the hypoglycemia event rate was higher in patients with baseline HOMA-2%ß ≤median versus >median (2.29 vs 1.60 events/patient-year; adjusted IRR = 1.737; 95% CI, 1.439-2.097); corresponding saxagliptin hypoglycemia event rates were too low to draw meaningful conclusions (0.16 vs 0.09 events/patient-year; adjusted IRR = 2.457; 95% CI, 1.148-5.256). The association between lower ß-cell function at baseline and increased prevalence of hypoglycemia was particularly strong in patients aged ≥75 years (adjusted IRR = 2.409; 95% CI, 1.686-3.442; P < 0.001), although it was also significant in patients aged 65 to <75 years old (adjusted IRR, 1.654; 95% CI, 1.339-2.043; P < 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: In patients with lower ß-cell function, the addition of a sulfonylurea to a metformin regimen was associated with an increased risk for hypoglycemia compared with that in patients with higher ß-cell function; low hypoglycemia event rates with the addition of saxagliptin limited equivalent assessments. These findings in older patients are especially relevant because morbidity associated with hypoglycemia is higher in this age group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01006603 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Saxagliptin Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The recommended dose of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin is 2.5 mg in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min). In this post hoc analysis, we assessed the effect of saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg/day versus placebo on glycemic measures in patients with T2D and estimated glomerular filtration rate 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). METHODS: Efficacy and safety data were pooled from nine 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: The majority (56-61%) of patients were women aged <65 years with glycated hemoglobin (A1C) 8.1-8.2%; half of the patients had a T2D duration ≥5 years. Mean change from baseline in A1C was significantly greater with saxagliptin 2.5 (-0.6%, P = 0.036 vs placebo) and 5 mg/day (-0.9%, P < 0.001 vs placebo) compared with placebo (-0.2%). There were numerically greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postprandial glucose, and a significantly greater proportion of patients achieved A1C <7% with saxagliptin 5 mg/day (44.8%) compared with placebo (20.0%, P = 0.004 vs placebo). The incidence of hypoglycemia was not significantly different across groups (16.2% in the saxagliptin 5-mg/day, 12.2% in the saxagliptin 2.5-mg/day, and 11.3% in the placebo groups). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg/day improve glycemic control and are generally well tolerated in patients with T2D and moderate CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00121641, NCT00316082, NCT00698932, NCT00918879, NCT00121667, NCT00661362, NCT00313313, NCT00295633, NCT00757588. FUNDING: AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.