RESUMEN
Background: The comprehensive treatment mode of combining concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is a commonly used mainstream model in the clinical practice of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). However, the necessity for AC after CCRT lacks sufficient evidence-based medical support. This study constructs a predictive model for the survival time dependence of CCRT ± AC for LACC based on the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging with internal validation, the prognosis was assessed with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin, and provides guidance for future stratified treatment. Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis included 482 patients with LACC who CCRT from January 2016 to January 2023. Patients who used the 2009 FIGO staging were all standardized for the 2018 FIGO staging. The 482 patients with LACC were divided into a training set (n = 290) and a validation set (n = 192) at a ratio of 6:4. COX multivariate regression model and LASSO regression were used to screen for independent prognostic factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and a nomogram clinical prediction model was constructed based on these factors. Evaluate the effectiveness of the model through the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve, risk heat map, and survival curves for risk stratification. Results: The PFS and OS independent prognostic risk factors affecting the 2018 FIGO staging of LACC during CCRT were validated to be similar to the 2009 FIGO staging prediction model reported in previous literature. In the training cohort, area under the curve (AUC) values at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.941, 0.882, and 0.885 for PFS, and 0.946, 0.946, and 0.969 for OS, respectively. When applied to a test cohort, the model also showed accurate prediction result (AUC at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.869, 0.891, and 0.899 for PFS, and 0.891, 0.941 and 0.878 for OS, respectively). Subgroup analysis suggests that patients with LACC, adenocarcinoma, stage IVA, pelvic lymph node metastasis, pretreatment hemoglobin ≤100 g/l and residual tumor diameter >2 cm, who received CCRT in the 2018 FIGO stage, may benefit more from adjuvant chemtherapy. Conclusions: Based on the 2018 FIGO staging, a nomogram prediction model for PFS and OS in patients with LACC undergoing CCRT was developed. The model, established by combining weighted clinical and pathological factors, can provide more personalized treatment predictions in clinical practice. For patients with high-risk factors such as residual tumor diameter > 2 cm after CCRT for LACC, AC may bring benefits.
RESUMEN
Background: The molecular mechanisms underlying chemoresistance are still poorly understood in nasopharyngeal cancer. The protein expression of ERCC1 in DNA repair genes has been reported related to resistance platinum and predicting treatment outcomes in various malignant carcinomas, but the benefit for predicting outcomes with optimal cutoff value of ERCC1mRNA is controversial. The level of plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is positively correlated with clinical stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The predictive value of ERCC1mRNA from receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) and EBV-DNA level for stratified treatment with stage II NPC is exactly unclear. This study aims to assess the predictive value of combined EBV-DNA and ERCC1 in stage II nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent cisplatin, and provide guidance for future stratified treatment. Methods: A total of 86 stage II NPC patients who received IMRT and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy with or without cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy had measurements of ERCC1 mRNA, and pretreatment EBV-DNA levels were analyzed by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Associations of ERCC1 mRNA and pretreatment EBV-DNA levels with clinical characteristics and survivals were evaluated. Results: Cutoff value of ERCC1 mRNA obtained from ROC curve was used, and there were significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) between high expression group and low expression group (p = 0.021 and 0.030 and 0.000, respectively). Patients with pretreatment EBV-DNA <2000 copies/mL had significantly better PFS and ORR (p = 0.024 and 0.043, respectively) and a marginally significant impact on OS (p = 0.062) than those with pretreatment EBV-DNA ≥2000 copies/mL. Patients were divided into three groups by combination of ERCC1 mRNA and EBV-DNA level: ERCC1 mRNA low expression/pre-EBV-DNA <2000 copies/mL, ERCC1 mRNA low expression/pre-EBV-DNA ≥2000 copies/mL, and ERCC1 mRNA high expression/pre-EBV-DNA ≥2000 copies/mL. There were significant differences in ORR among the three groups (p = 0.005). The median follow-up was 62 months (range 22-84) with a follow-up rate of 90.70%. In these groups by combination of ERCC1 mRNA and EBV-DNA level, 1, 3, 5-year OS were 100%, 100%, 100%; 100%, 94.1%, 90.9%; and 100%, 85%, 72.9%, respectively (p = 0.038); 1, 3, 5-year PFS were 100%, 100%, 100%; 97.1%, 91.2%, 84.8%; and 95%, 85%, 71.4%, respectively (p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis showed that combination of ERCC1 mRNA and EBV-DNA levels remained independent prognostic factor but not ERCC1 mRNA and EBV-DNA alone. Conclusions: Combined ERCC1 mRNA and pre-EBV-DNA is a better prognostic biomarker in stage II NPC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Patients with ERCC1 mRNA high expression/pre-EBV-DNA ≥2000 copies/mL may benefit from more aggressive treatment.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al ADN , Endonucleasas , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , ADN Viral/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Endonucleasas/genética , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/genética , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/terapia , Herpesvirus Humano 4/genética , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/genética , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/genética , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Pronóstico , ARN Mensajero/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are obviously ethnic differences between the UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms. Due to the difference of genetic background and environment, the treatment with colorectal cancer patients of Guangxi Zhuang should not completely follow the Euramerican or Chinese han patients. The study aimed to explore the correlation of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism of Guangxi Zhuang metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with irinotecan -based chemotherapy, in order to develop an individualized irinotecan regimen for mCRC patients of Guangxi Zhuang. METHODS: From June 2013 and June 2015, a total of 406 patients of Guangxi who were histologically diagnosed as metastatic colorectal cancer with 102 patients of this cohort with three generations of Zhuang, and 86 patients that conformed to inclusion and exclusion criteria were competitively enrolled. The distribution of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism was analyzed-retrospectively in all patients. Pyrosequencing method was used to detect the UGT1A1*28 and*6 gene polymorphism in the 86 Guangxi Zhuang mCRC patients. After first-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI regimen, the relationship between gene polymorphism of UGT1A1 and adverse reactions, and efficacy of Irinotecan were analyzed with χ2 test and Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: UGT1A1*28 wild-type (TA6/6), heterozygous mutant (TA6/7) and homozygous mutant (TA7/7) accounted for 69.8, 30.2 and 0%, respectively. UGT1A1*6 wild type (G/G), heterozygous mutation type (G/A) and homozygous mutant (A/A) accounted for 76.7%, 20.9 and 2.3%, respectively. UGT1A1*28 TA6/7 type could increase the risk of grade 3~4 diarrhea (p = 0.027), which did not increase the risk of grade 3~4 neutropenia (p = 0.092). UGT1A1*6G/A and A/A type could increase the risk of grade 3~4 diarrhea and neutropenia (p = 0.001; p = 0.017). After chemotherapy with FOLFIRI, there was no significant difference in response rate (RR) (p = 0.729; p = 0.745) or in median progression-free survival (mPFS) between the wild-type, mutant treatment of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 (7.0 m vs 7.4 m, p = 0.427; 6.9 m vs 7.0 m p = 0.408). CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 gene polymorphism in Guangxi Zhuang patients were differed from the existing reported of European people and Chinese Han population. The UGT1A1 gene polymorphism with irinotecan chemotherapy-associated diarrhea and neutropenia were closely related. There was no significant association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and therapeutic efficacy of irinotecan.