Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1376019, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957353

RESUMEN

Introduction: Neurogenic hypertension (HTN) is a type of HTN characterized by increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system. Vascular compression is one of the pathogenic mechanisms of neurogenic HTN. Despite Jannetta's solid anatomical and physiological arguments in favor of neurogenic HTN in the 1970's, the treatment for essential HTN by microvascular decompression (MVD) still lacks established selection criteria. Therefore, the subjects selected for our center were limited to patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) of the vertebral/basilar artery (VA/BA) responsible vessel type coexisting with neurogenic HTN who underwent MVD of the brainstem to further explore possible indications for MVD in the treatment of neurogenic HTN. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 63 patients who were diagnosed with neurogenic HTN had symptoms of HFS and TN cranial nerve disease. Patients were treated at our neurosurgery department from January 2018 to January 2023. A preoperative magnetic resonance examination of the patients revealed the presence of abnormally located vascular compression in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) and the root entry zone (REZ) of the IX and X cranial nerves (CN IX- X). Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, course of HFS, course of TN, course of HTN, degree of HTN, or preoperative blood pressure. Based on the postoperative blood pressure levels, nine out of 63 patients were cured (14.28%), eight cases (12.70%) showed a marked effect, 16 cases (25.40%) were effective, and 30 cases were invalid (47.62%). The overall efficacy was 52.38%. However, 39 cases of combined cranial nerve disease were on the left side of the efficacy rate (66.67%) and 24 cases of combined cranial nerve disease were on the right side of the efficacy rate (29.16%). Discussion: Over the last few decades, many scholars have made pioneering progress in the clinical retrospective study of MVD for neurogenic hypertension, and our study confirms the efficacy of MVD in treating vertebral/basilar artery-type neurogenic hypertension by relieving the vascular pressure of RVLM. In the future, with the development and deepening of pathological mechanisms and clinical observational studies, MVD may become an important treatment for neurogenic hypertension by strictly grasping the surgical indications. Conclusion: MVD is an effective treatment for neurogenic HTN. Indications may include the following: left-sided TN or HFS combined with neurogenic HTN; VA/BA compression in the left RVLM and REZ areas on MRI; and blood pressure in these patients cannot be effectively controlled by drugs.

2.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1292958, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38073645

RESUMEN

Objective: To conduct a comprehensive search and causality study of potential modifiable risk factors for trigeminal neuralgia. To provide new ideas for subsequent treatment and management of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Methods: Data were obtained from large GWAS databases and then analyzed by Mendelian randomization analysis. The causal relationship between 36 potentially modifiable risk factors and trigeminal neuralgia was explored based on the results of the inverse variance weighting method(IVW). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Years of schooling [OR (95%CI), 0.59(0.42-0.84), p = 0.003] to be a significant protective factor. Anxiety disorders [OR (95%CI), 1.62(1.05-2.48), p = 0.028], Depression [OR (95%CI), 1.53(1.03-2.28), p = 0.035] and Autoimmune [OR (95%CI), 1.16(1.01-1.32), p = 0.033] were significant risk factors. Sleep duration [OR (95%CI), 0.43(0.18-1.01), p = 0.051] was a close protective factor. Body mass index [OR (95%CI), 1.24(0.98-1.57), p = 0.077] was a close risk factor. Conclusion: Mendelian randomization analysis shows Years of schooling and Sleep duration as protective factors. Anxiety disorders, Depression, Autoimmune, and Body mass index are risk factors. This will help in the research of diagnosis, treatment, and mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia. And reduce the prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia through positive psychological and lifestyle interventions.

3.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1293056, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130833

RESUMEN

Trigeminal neuralgia is a paroxysmal, intense electric shock-like, or knife-like, recurrent pain that affects one or more sense areas of the unilateral facial trigeminal nerve. It can be classified into two groups from an etiological standpoint: primary and secondary. The pain episodes brought on by such vascular compression are still categorized as primary trigeminal neuralgia, despite the fact that microvascular compression of the trigeminal nerve root has now been demonstrated to be the primary cause. A rare and complicated condition known as a dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) can irritate the Gasserian ganglion or compress the trigeminal nerve's root entry zone (REZ), leading to secondary trigeminal neuralgia (TN). At present, the treatment of DAVF-induced trigeminal neuralgia is not conclusive. This article reports a case of DAVF-induced trigeminal neuralgia cured by MVD and reviews the relevant literature.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA