Hand hygiene in medical students: performance, education and knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Despite several guidelines on hand hygiene (HH), compliance especially in physicians is reported to be low which has huge implications for healthcare-associated infections. To evaluate performance of HH, influence of teaching and influence of monitoring the results in medical students, we conducted an observational study. METHODS: Performance of hand disinfection was evaluated in first (N=28), third (N=193) and fifth (N=45) year medical students using fluorescent hand disinfectant. The influence of teaching and information about result control was assessed. The students perception of the impact of HH was also evaluated by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Presence of disinfectant gaps was observed significantly more often in first year medical students compared to third year ones (82% vs, 60%; p=0.02). In additional, > 3 gaps were seen significantly more often in first year medical students compared to fifth year students (36% vs. 9%; p=0.007). Both information about teaching and monitoring the results improved outcome significantly. For example, gaps were present in 92% without information and without teaching, in 70% (RR: 1.3 (1.0-1.6); p=0.003) with information about result control only, and in only 18% (5.1 (3.0-8.5); p=0.0001) after teaching. Notably, the medical students ascribed HH to be of a great importance regardless of their level of education. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of HH could be improved by practical training as evidenced by best HH performance being documented immediately after teaching and a training effect during the course of medical studies was also observed. Thus, we suggest implementing regular education and practical training on HH from early on in the medical studies curricula to improve overall quality of patient care. regular education and practical training on HH from early on in the medical studies curricula to improve overall quality of patient care.

Childhood infections and risk of wheezing and allergic sensitisation at age 7-8 years.

BACKGROUND: Childhood atopic disease has been associated with exposure to infections early in life. There is however considerable controversy on this issue, since evidence exists for both protective and adverse effects of infections. Aim of this study was to investigate the association between childhood infections and the occurrence of wheeze and allergic sensitisation in 7-8-year-old Dutch and German children. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted among German and Dutch children participating in a large longitudinal study on respiratory health. Parents of 510 7-8-year-old children with respiratory complaints and an equal number of children without respiratory complaints were asked to complete a questionnaire. Blood samples were collected for specific serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) analysis. Data on childhood infections were collected through records of the participating Municipal Health Services. RESULTS: No association was found between recent wheeze and any of the childhood infections investigated. For scarlet fever infection an increased risk of allergic sensitisation (OR: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.40-5.72) and sensitisation against grasses (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.35-6.69) at the age of 7-8 years was found. Varicella infection tended towards increased risk of sensitisation against grasses (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 0.99-3.58). For allergic sensitisation and sensitisation against grasses the odds ratios increased with increasing number of infections. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not lend support to the suggestion that childhood infection protects against wheezing or allergic sensitisation at age 7-8 years. Scarlet fever or varicella infection presented an increased risk of allergic sensitisation.

Environmental agents as cause of health disorders in children presented at an outpatient unit of environmental medicine.

There are no publications on the frequency of environmental agents causing diseases in children presented at centers of environmental medicine. The aim of this study was to perform a statistical analysis of the data of children who visited the outpatient Unit of Environmental Medicine (UEM) at the University Hospital of Aachen, Germany. Data of all UEM patient files from January 1988 to September 1996 were evaluated. From a total of 682 patients, 75 were children (40 girls, 35 boys, age range 1-12 years). Forty-six children were presented with unspecific health disorders, 12 to examine a possible relationship between environmental agents and a current condition, mostly atopy (n = 10). Complaints were mucosal irritations (n = 38), unspecific (n = 19), dermatological (n = 16), gastrointestinal (n = 4), heart/circulation-related (n = 2), musculoskeletal (n = 1) and neurological (n = 1) symptoms. Wood preservatives were mentioned as suspected environmental causative agents in 22 cases, followed by unspecific indoor factors (n = 15), factories/disposal sites near homes (n = 9), formaldehyde (n = 5) and unspecific exposures (n = 5). Biomonitoring was done in 44 cases, local inspections and ambient monitoring in 10 cases. No evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship was found in 55 children, but was deemed possible in nine cases. In nine other children, a relatively high degree of exposure was determined by chemical analysis, but clinical relevance remained unclear. One child suffered from subclinical mercury poisoning caused by inadequate homeopathic medication. In most children referred to an environmental medicine center, it is difficult or impossible to verify an environmental cause using the diagnostic instruments currently available.

Predictive value of human biomonitoring in environmental medicine: experiences at the outpatient unit of environmental medicine (UEM) of the University Hospital Aachen, Germany.

There is little data on the distribution of biomonitoring parameters in patients at outpatient Units of Environmental Medicine (UEM). We evaluated the biomonitoring parameters of 646 UEM outpatients from our University Hospital 1988-1998. Few patients were exposed to specific substances. Data of patients who were not obviously exposed was analysed statistically (geometric mean, standard deviation, median, 95th percentile). Results were compared with reference values in literature. Normal distribution of biomonitoring parameters was rare. 95th percentiles for arsenic, chromium, selenium, zinc, phenol and toluene were below standard, 95th percentiles for copper and mercury above, and 95th percentiles for lead, cadmium, pentachlorophenol, lindane, and beta-hexachlorocyclohexane were within the published range of reference values. Thallium as well as most volatile organic compounds analyzed were below detection levels. Aluminum and fluorine exposure was rarely analysed. In view of these results, it is concluded that the indication for biomonitoring needs to be stringent as levels of biomonitoring parameters are generally not risen in patients of the UEM.