Association of Physical Domain Participation with POTFF Domains in Special Forces Operators.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the physical domain (PD) to improve performance in all the POTFF domains (physical, psychological, social/family, and spiritual) among Special Forces (SF) Operators. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of active SF Operators assigned to the United States Army Special Operations Command (USASOC). Recruitment began in October 2016. Testing began on 1 January 2017, and concluded on 28 February 2020. Participants completed physical testing, blood draws, and questionnaires to determine domain metrics. Means, medians, and proportions were compared by level of participation in the PD. RESULTS: A total of 231 Soldiers participated; n=63 in the control group, n=93 in the <4 days PD/week (PD <4) group, and n=66 in the >4 days PD/week (PD =4) group. The average age was 31 years (range 21-47 y). The average time in the Special Operations Forces (SOF) was 4 years (range 0-19 y). The PD =4 group showed significantly greater overall upper (p=.01) and lower (p=0) body strength, power (p=.01), and positive affect (p=.04). The PD =4 group also had significantly lower anxiety (p=.03), stress (p=.04), and depression (p=.02) than the control group. CONCLUSION: The PD and psychological domain metrics were most associated with PD participation. This finding is consistent with the goals of the PD, which are to increase physical and mental capabilities and decrease injury recovery time.

Differences in Stress Shoot Performance Among Special Forces Operators Who Participate in a Human Performance Program Versus Those Who Do Not.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to determine if Army Special Operation Forces (ARSOF) Operators who participate in the Tactical Human Optimization, Rapid Rehabilitation and Reconditioning program perform significantly better on a simulated stress shoot scenario than ARSOF Operators who do not participate in the program. METHODS: Deidentified archival data from 64 male ARSOF Operators (mean ± standard deviation: age, 31.1 ± 4.96 years; SOF experience, 3.44 ± 4.10 years) who participated in the Special Forces Advanced Urban Combat stress shoot were assessed to determine if differences in performance existed between program users (n = 25) and nonusers (n = 39). A series of bootstrapped analyses of variance in conjunction with effect-size calculations was conducted to determine if significant mean score differences existed between users and nonusers on raw and total course completion times, high-value target acquisition (positive identification time), and penalties accrued. RESULTS: Small to medium effect sizes were observed between users and nonusers in raw time, penalties, and total time. Although there were no significant differences between users and nonusers, there was less variation in raw time and total time in users compared with nonusers. CONCLUSION: Our findings becomes a question of practical versus statistical significance, because less performance variability while under physical and psychological duress could be life saving for ARSOF Operators.

Increasing energy flux to decrease the biological drive toward weight regain after weight loss - A proof-of-concept pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Weight loss induces compensatory biological adjustments that increase hunger and decrease resting metabolic rate (RMR), which increase propensity for weight regain. In non-obese adults high levels of physical activity coupled with high energy intake (high energy flux) are associated with higher RMR and reduced hunger. We tested the possibility that a high flux state attenuates the increase in hunger and the decrease in RMR characteristic of diet-induced weight loss. METHODS: Six obese adults [age (mean ± SE) = 42 ± 12 y; body mass index (BMI) = 35.7 ± 3.7 kg/m2] underwent measures of RMR, the thermic effect of a meal (TEM), and fasting and postprandial measures of hunger and fullness as well as plasma glucose and insulin. Following weight loss, subjects completed two 5-day conditions of energy balance in random order-Low Flux (LF): sedentary with energy intake (EI) = RMR (kcal/d) × 1.35; and High Flux (HF): net exercise energy cost of ∼500 kcal/d and EI = RMR (kcal/d) × 1.7. RMR was measured daily for each flux condition. The morning following each of the respective experimentally controlled HF and LF conditions (flux day 5), they underwent the same pre-weight loss tests and also reported their perceptions of hunger and fullness during the previous four days of HF and LF, respectively. RESULTS: Average daily RMR was higher during HF (1926 ± 138 kcal/day) compared to LF (1847 ± 126 kcal/day; P < 0.05). Perceived hunger at the end of day was lower (p < 0.03) and fullness throughout the day was higher (p < 0.02) in HF compared to LF conditions. On day 5 of each flux condition, the thermic effect of a meal and circulating glucose and insulin after the meal did not differ between HF and LF. CONCLUSION: Following weight loss, compared to a sedentary LF state of energy balance, a short-term HF energy balance state is associated with higher RMR, lower perceived hunger, and greater perceived fullness, all of which could help attenuate the biologic drive to regain weight. Given the pilot nature of this study and the relatively short period of time spent in the high and low flux states, future research is needed to address this research question in a larger sample over a longer time period.