Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Foods ; 13(11)2024 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890930

RESUMEN

Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni are among the most common foodborne pathogens worldwide, and poultry products are strongly associated with foodborne pathogen outbreaks. These pathogens are capable of producing biofilms on several surfaces used in the food processing industry, including polyethylene and stainless steel. However, studies on multi-species biofilms are rare. Therefore, this study aimed to develop predictive mathematical models to simulate the adhesion and removal of multispecies biofilms. All combinations of microorganisms resulted in biofilm formation with differences in bacterial counts. E. coli showed the greatest ability to adhere to both surfaces, followed by S. Enteritidis and C. jejuni. The incubation time and temperature did not influence adhesion. Biofilm removal was effective with citric acid and benzalkonium chloride but not with rhamnolipid. Among the generated models, 46 presented a significant coefficient of determination (R2), with the highest R2 being 0.88. These results provide support for the poultry industry in creating biofilm control and eradication programs to avoid the risk of contamination of poultry meat.

2.
Food Microbiol ; 114: 104280, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290865

RESUMEN

Poultry products are recognized as the main source of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni infections in humans, while avian pathogenic Escherichia coli may have zoonotic potential and can be transmitted from chicken meat to humans. Biofilm formation contributes to their spread through the food chain. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of Salmonella Enteritidis, E. coli, and C. jejuni strains isolated from poultry, food implicated in outbreaks, and poultry slaughterhouses on three surfaces widely used in poultry production (polystyrene, stainless steel, and polyethylene). S. Enteritidis and E. coli adhesion on the three surfaces tested were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Interestingly, the number of C. jejuni cells on stainless steel (4.51-4.67 log10 CFU/cm.-2) was significantly higher (p = 0.0004) than that on polystyrene (3.80-4.25 log10 CFU/cm.-2), but similar (p > 0.05) to that on polyethylene (4.03-4.36 log10 CFU/cm.-2). However, C. jejuni adhesion was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than S. Enteritidis and E. coli adhesion, regardless of the surface evaluated. In addition, scanning electron microscopy analyses have shown an increased irregularity of the stainless steel surface when compared to polyethylene and polystyrene. These irregularities form small spaces ideal for microbial adhesion.


Asunto(s)
Campylobacter jejuni , Salmonella enteritidis , Humanos , Escherichia coli , Adhesión Bacteriana , Biopelículas , Poliestirenos , Acero Inoxidable , Microbiología de Alimentos , Polietileno
3.
Braz J Microbiol ; 54(3): 2035-2045, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184738

RESUMEN

Owing to its antimicrobial activity, electrochemically activated water (ECAW) is a potential alternative to chemical disinfectants for eliminating foodborne pathogens, including Salmonella Heidelberg, from food processing facilities. However, their antibiofilm activity remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the antibiofilm activity of ECAW against S. Heidelberg biofilms formed on stainless steel and polyethylene and to determine its corrosive capacity. ECAW (200 ppm) and a broad-spectrum disinfectant (0.2%) were tested for their antibiofilm activity against S. Heidelberg at 25 °C and 37 °C after 10 and 20 min of contact with stainless steel and polyethylene. Potentiostatic polarization tests were performed to compare the corrosive capacity of both compounds. Both compounds were effective in removing S. Heidelberg biofilms. Bacterial counts were significantly lower with ECAW than with disinfectant in polyethylene, regardless the time of contact. The time of contact and the surface significantly influenced the bacterial counts of S. Heidelberg. Temperature was not an important factor affecting the antibiofilm activities of the compounds. ECAW was less corrosive than the disinfectant. ECAW demonstrated a similar or even superior effect in the control of S. Heidelberg biofilms, when compared to disinfectants, reducing bacterial counts by up to 5 log10 CFU cm-2. The corrosion of stainless steel with ECAW was similar to that of commercial disinfectants. This technology is a possible alternative for controlling S. Heidelberg in the food production chain.


Asunto(s)
Cáusticos , Desinfectantes , Acero Inoxidable , Cáusticos/farmacología , Biopelículas , Salmonella , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Polietilenos/farmacología , Microbiología de Alimentos
4.
Braz J Microbiol ; 53(2): 1051-1064, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260995

RESUMEN

Biofilm formation has been suggested to play a significant role in the survival of pathogens in food production. Interest in evaluating alternative products of natural origin for disinfectant use has increased. However, there is a lack of information regarding the effects of biosurfactants and organic acids on Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni biofilms, mainly considering temperatures found in environments of poultry processing, as well as simulating the contact times used for disinfection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibiofilm activity of rhamnolipid, malic acid, and citric acid on the adhesion of S. Enteritidis, E. coli, and C. jejuni on polystyrene surfaces at different temperatures (4, 12, and 25 °C), compound concentrations, and times of contact (5 and 10 min), and to analyze the potential use of these compounds to disrupt formed biofilms. All three compounds exhibited antibiofilm activity under all analyzed conditions, both in the prevention and removal of formed biofilms. Contact time was less important than temperature and concentration. The antibiofilm activity of the compounds also varied according to the pathogens involved. In the food industry, compound selection must consider the temperature found in each stage of product processing and the target pathogens to be controlled.


Asunto(s)
Campylobacter jejuni , Escherichia coli , Animales , Biopelículas , Microbiología de Alimentos , Aves de Corral/microbiología , Temperatura
5.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 17(3): 228-233, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647339

RESUMEN

Salmonella spp. are among the most important pathogens in poultry farming, and Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) is one of the most frequent serotypes isolated in Brazil. SH has a zoonotic potential and stands out as a pathogen that is difficult to eliminate from the poultry chain due to its resistance to disinfectants. One alternative to traditional disinfectants is the electrochemically-activated water (ECA), a bactericidal compound produced from the electrolysis of salt and water. ECA generators produce a compound that consists of free chlorine, hypochlorous acid, and other free radicals. This alternative control method is safe for human health and reduces environmental contamination. The present study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of ECA against 30 SH isolates from poultry origin in scenarios that simulated the chiller environment (4°C, 5 and 50 parts per million [ppm], 5 and 40 min of exposure) and the cleaning and disinfection process (25°C, 200 ppm, 5 and 10 min of exposure). In the quantitative test, SH was susceptible to ECA. The mean bacterial counts decreased significantly compared to the control group, especially at 200 ppm. At this concentration, ECA inhibited the growth of almost 87% of the Salmonella strains, and the results showed a significant decrease in the mean bacterial counts for both exposure times (5 and 10 min). These findings demonstrate that ECA is effective against SH in vitro and it is a possible alternative to disinfection in the poultry industry for the control of this pathogen. However, in situ tests in the food industry are needed.


Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes/farmacología , Desinfección/métodos , Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonella/efectos de los fármacos , Agua/química , Animales , Brasil , Cloro/farmacología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Electroquímica , Electrólisis , Contaminación de Alimentos , Microbiología de Alimentos , Radicales Libres/farmacología , Ácido Hipocloroso/farmacología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Sales (Química)/farmacología
6.
Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz (Online) ; 73(4): 368-371, out.-dez. 2014.
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: lil-783215

RESUMEN

Algumas espécies de aves silvestres têm sido identificadas como reservatórios de Campylobacter e Salmonella, as quais atuam como propagadoras desses micro-organismos; entretanto, não há estudo sobre o papel das aves silvestres na transmissão desses agentes patogênicos no Brasil. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi de verificar a presença desses agentes patogênicos em aves silvestres que se alimentam em lavouras orizícolas. Vinte e três Garibaldis (Chrysomus ruficapillus), uma Rolinha-picuí (Columbinapicui) e um Canário-da-terra (Sicalis flaveola) foram capturados com redes de neblina. As amostras de fezes das aves foram coletadas com o uso de zaragatoas e foram processadas para efetuar pesquisa de Campylobacter spp. e Salmonella enterica. Oito (32%) amostras de fezes de C. ruficapillus foram positivas para Campylobacter e seis (24%) foram positivas para Salmonella enterica. Cinco (20%) amostras coletadas de C. ruficapillus e uma de S. flaveola foram positivas para Salmonella. C. ruficapillus e S. flaveola mostraram ser reservatórios de Campylobacter e Salmonella e, consequentemente, podem atuar como potenciais disseminadores destes patógenos. Este é o primeiro registro de isolamento de Campylobacter e Salmonella de amostras de fezes de C. ruficapillus e S. flaveola silvestres...


Asunto(s)
Animales , Aves , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonella enterica/aislamiento & purificación
7.
R. Inst. Adolfo Lutz ; 73(4): 368-371, 2014.
Artículo en Portugués | VETINDEX | ID: vti-715213

RESUMEN

Some species of wild birds have been identified as reservoirs of Campylobacter e Salmonella, they may exert as disseminators of these microorganisms. However, in Brazil, there is no study on the role of wild birds in the transmission of these two pathogens. This study aimed at searching the occurrence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in wild birds that feed in the rice paddies. By using mist nets 23 garibaldis (Chrysomus ruficapillus), one rolinha-picuí (Columbina picui) and one canário-da-terra (Sicalis flaveola) were captured. The birds stool samples were collected using swabs, and they were processed for searching Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella enterica. Eight (32 %) fecal samples collected from C. ruficapillus were Campylobacter-positive and six (24 %) were positive to Salmonella enterica; five (20 %) samples collected from C. ruficapillus and one (4%) from S. flaveola were positive to Salmonella enterica. The two birds C. ruficapillus and S. flaveola showed to be reservoirs of Campylobacter and Salmonella, and they can be potential transmitters of these pathogens. This study is the first report on the isolation of Campylobacter and Salmonella from wild birds C. ruficapillus and S. flaveola.(AU)


Algumas espécies de aves silvestres têm sido identificadas como reservatórios de Campylobacter e Salmonella, as quais atuam como propagadoras desses micro-organismos; entretanto, não há estudo sobre o papel das aves silvestres na transmissão desses agentes patogênicos no Brasil. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi de verificar a presença desses agentes patogênicos em aves silvestres que se alimentam em lavouras orizícolas. Vinte e três Garibaldis (Chrysomus ruficapillus), uma Rolinha-picuí (Columbina picui) e um Canário-da-terra (Sicalis flaveola) foram capturados com redes de neblina. As amostras de fezes das aves foram coletadas com o uso de zaragatoas e foram processadas para efetuar pesquisa de Campylobacter spp. e Salmonella enterica. Oito (32 %) amostras de fezes de C. ruficapillus foram positivas para Campylobacter e seis (24 %) foram positivas para Salmonella enterica. Cinco (20 %) amostras coletadas de C. ruficapillus e uma de S. flaveola foram positivas para Salmonella. C. ruficapillus e S. flaveola mostraram ser reservatórios de Campylobacter e Salmonella e, consequentemente, podem atuar como potenciais disseminadores destes patógenos. Este é o primeiro registro de isolamento de Campylobacter e Salmonella de amostras de fezes de C. ruficapillus e S. flaveola silvestres.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Animales , Canarios/microbiología , Aves/microbiología , Salmonella enterica/aislamiento & purificación , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Animales Salvajes , Oryza
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA