Outcomes Following In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in People Receiving Maintenance Dialysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Previous studies showing poor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes in the dialysis population have largely been derived from claims data and are somewhat limited by a lack of detailed characterization of CPR events. We aimed to analyze CPR-related outcomes in individuals receiving maintenance dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Using electronic medical records from a single academic health care system, we identified all hospitalized adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis who had undergone in-hospital CPR between 2006 and 2014. EXPOSURE: Initial in-hospital CPR. OUTCOMES: Overall survival, predictors of unsuccessful CPR, predictors of death during the same hospitalization among initial survivors, predictors of discharge-to-home status. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We provide descriptive statistics for the study variables and used t tests, χ2 tests, or Fisher exact tests to compare differences between the groups. We built multivariable logistic regression models to examine the CPR-related outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients received in-hospital CPR: 51 (28%) did not survive the initial CPR event, and 77 CPR survivors died (additional 42%) later during the same hospitalization (overall mortality 70%). Only 18 (10%) were discharged home, with the remaining 32 (17%) discharged to a rehabilitation facility or a nursing home. In the multivariable model, the only predictor of unsuccessful CPR was CPR duration (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.24-1.61; P < 0.001). Predictors of death during the same hospitalization after surviving the initial CPR event were CPR duration (OR, 1.15; 95% CI 1.04-1.27; P = 0.007) and older age (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.23-2.2; P < 0.001). Older people also had lower odds of discharge-to-home status (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.54; P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design, single-center study, no information on functional status. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving maintenance dialysis experience high mortality following in-hospital CPR and only 10% are discharged home. These data may help clinicians provide useful prognostic information while engaging in goals of care conversations.

Long-Term Patency of Arteriovenous Fistulae Salvaged by Balloon Angioplasty with and without Accessory Vein Embolization: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether accessory vein embolization (AVE) improves long-term performance of salvaged nonmaturing arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 72 patients who underwent percutaneous balloon angioplasty for salvage of nonmaturing AVFs between 2008 and 2014. AVE was performed on 32 patients between 2008 and 2011 (mean age, 59 y [range, 33-85 y]; men, n = 21; women, n = 11; upper arm, n = 17; forearm, n = 15), whereas the procedure was not performed on 40 patients after 2011 (mean age, 62 y [range, 28-85 y]; men, n = 26; women, n = 14; upper arm, n = 26; forearm, n = 14). Endpoints compared between groups included number of procedures required to achieve maturation, time to maturation, number of procedures required to maintain patency, and duration of primary and secondary patency after intervention. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in number of procedures to achieve maturation (2.1 ± 1.4 vs 2.4 ± 1.2; P = .24) or time to maturation (26.1 d ± 56.2 vs 41.1 d ± 54.6; P = .072) between AVE and no embolization groups. Primary (P = .21) and secondary patency (P = .14) after intervention were not significantly different between groups. The number of procedures performed to maintain patency after maturation was significantly greater in the AVE group for patients with forearm AVFs (0.11 ± 0.098 vs 0.04 ± 0.064 per patient year; P = .039) but not for patients with upper arm AVFs. CONCLUSIONS: AVE of AVFs after balloon angioplasty does not lead to significantly improved long-term outcomes. Percutaneous salvage of nonmaturing AVFs in the forearm without AVE resulted in a decreased number of interventions to maintain patency.

Assisted maturation of native fistula in two patients with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device.

Patients who receive a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are prone to develop end-stage renal disease. Primary arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation in these patients may be unsuccessful secondary to the nonpulsatile flow with an LVAD. Two patients with LVADs are described in whom assisted maturation aided long-term AVF patency.

Sodium bicarbonate therapy for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal hydration measures to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy are controversial. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the MEDLINE database (1966 to January 2008), EMBASE (January 2008), and abstracts from conference proceedings. SETTING & POPULATION: Adult patients undergoing contrast procedures. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous hydration with sodium bicarbonate with hydration with intravenous normal saline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. INTERVENTION: Hydration with intravenous sodium bicarbonate with or without N-acetylcysteine versus hydration with normal saline with or without N-acetylcysteine. OUTCOMES: Contrast-induced nephropathy, need for renal replacement therapy, and worsening of heart failure. RESULTS: Twelve trials (1,854 participants) were included. Sodium bicarbonate significantly decreased the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (12 trials, 1,652 patients; odds ratio [OR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.82; I2 = 55.9%) without a significant difference in need for renal replacement therapy (9 trials, 1,215 patients; OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.53; I2 = 0%), in-hospital mortality (11 trials, 1,640 patients; OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.69), or congestive heart failure compared with controls. Similar results were seen for the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy when sodium bicarbonate was compared with normal saline alone (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.77), but not when sodium bicarbonate/N-acetylcysteine combination was compared with N-acetylcysteine/normal saline combination (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.37). A subgroup analysis limited to published trials showed similar results (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.64; I2 = 63.3%), whereas unpublished studies showed a nonsignificant decrease (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.57; I2 = 25.9%) in risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. LIMITATION: Publication bias and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Hydration with sodium bicarbonate decreases the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in comparison to hydration with normal saline without a significant difference in need for renal replacement therapy and in-hospital mortality. Larger studies analyzing patient-centered outcomes are needed.