Spatial acuity of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) biosonar system with a bat and human comparison.

Horizontal angular resolution was measured in two bottlenose dolphins using a two-alternative forced-choice, biosonar target discrimination paradigm. The task required a stationary dolphin positioned in a hoop to discriminate two physical targets at a range of 4 m. The angle separating the targets was manipulated to estimate an angular discrimination threshold of 1.5°. In a second experiment, a similar two-target biosonar discrimination task was conducted with one free-swimming dolphin, to test whether its emission beam was a critical factor in discriminating the targets. The spatial separation between two targets was manipulated to measure a discrimination threshold of 6.7 cm. There was a relationship between differences in acoustic signals received at each target and the dolphin's performance. The results of the angular resolution experiment were in good agreement with measures of the minimum audible angle of both dolphins and humans and remarkably similar to measures of angular difference discrimination in echolocating dolphins, bats, and humans. The results suggest that horizontal auditory spatial acuity may be a common feature of the mammalian auditory system rather than a specialized feature exclusive to echolocating auditory predators.

Spectral cues and temporal integration during cylinder echo discrimination by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Three bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) participated in simulated cylinder wall thickness discrimination tasks utilizing electronic "phantom" echoes. The first experiment resulted in psychometric functions (percent correct vs wall thickness difference) similar to those produced by a dolphin performing the task with physical cylinders. In the second experiment, a wide range of cylinder echoes was simulated, with the time separation between echo highlights covering a range from <30 to >300 µs. Dolphin performance and a model of the dolphin auditory periphery suggest that the dolphins used high-frequency, spectral-profiles of the echoes for discrimination and that the utility of spectral cues degraded when the time separation between echo highlights approached and exceeded the dolphin's temporal integration time of ∼264 µs.

Composite critical ratio functions for odontocete cetaceans.

Critical ratios (CRs) are useful for estimating detection thresholds of tonal signals when the spectral density of noise is known. In cetaceans, CRs have only been measured for a few animals representing four odontocete species. These data are sparse, particularly for lower frequencies where anthropogenic noise is concentrated. There is currently no systematic method for implementing CR predictions (e.g., a composite frequency-dependent CR function). The current study measures CRs for two bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and estimates composite CR functions. The composite models can aid in predicting and extrapolating auditory masking for a broad range of frequencies.

Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) detection of simulated echoes from normal and time-reversed clicks.

In matched filter processing, a stored template of the emitted sonar pulse is compared to echoes to locate individual replicas of the emitted pulse embedded in the echo stream. A number of experiments with bats have suggested that bats utilize matched filter processing for target ranging, but not for target detection. For dolphins, the few available data suggest that dolphins do not utilize matched filter processing. In this study, the effect of time-reversing a dolphin's emitted click was investigated. If the dolphin relied upon matched filter processing, time-reversal of the click would be expected to reduce the correlation between the (unaltered) click and the echoes and therefore lower detection performance. Two bottlenose dolphins were trained to perform a phantom echo detection task. On a small percentage of trials ("probe trials"), a dolphin's emitted click was time-reversed before interacting with the phantom echo system. Data from the normal and time-reversed trials were then analyzed and compared. There were no significant differences in detection performance or click emissions between the normal and time-reversed conditions for either subject, suggesting that the dolphins did not utilize matched filter processing for this echo detection task.