Time-dependent changes in skeletal response to teriparatide: escalating vs. constant dose teriparatide (PTH 1-34) in osteoporotic women.

Once-daily injections of teriparatide initially increase biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption, but markers peak after 6-12 months and then decline despite continued treatment. We sought to determine whether increasing teriparatide doses in a stepwise fashion could prolong skeletal responsiveness. We randomized 52 postmenopausal women with low spine and/or hip bone mineral density (BMD) to either a constant or an escalating subcutaneous teriparatide dose (30 µg daily for 18months or 20 µg daily for 6 months, then 30 µg daily for 6 months, and then 40 µg daily for 6 months). Serum procollagen I N-terminal propeptide, osteocalcin, and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were assessed frequently. BMD of the spine, hip, radius, and total body was measured every 6 months. Acute changes in urinary cyclic AMP in response to teriparatide were examined in a subset of women in the constant dose group. All bone markers differed significantly between the two treatment groups. During the final six months, bone markers declined in the constant dose group but remained stable or increased in the escalating dose group (all markers, p<0.017). Nonetheless, mean area under the curve did not differ between treatments for any bone marker, and BMD increases were equivalent in both treatment groups. Acute renal response to teriparatide, as assessed by urinary cyclic AMP, did not change over 18 months of teriparatide administration. In conclusion, stepwise increases in teriparatide prevented the decline in bone turnover markers that is observed with chronic administration without altering BMD increases. The time-dependent waning of the response to teriparatide appears to be bone-specific.

Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

CONTEXT: Teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent would alter its anabolic action. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We randomized 93 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) to alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 40 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal radius, and total body was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) every 6 months. Lumbar spine trabecular BMD was measured at baseline and month 30 by quantitative computed tomography. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide levels were assessed frequently. Women who had at least one repeat DXA scan on therapy were included in the analyses (n = 69). RESULTS: DXA spine BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (18 +/- 11 vs. 7 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (18+/-11 vs. 12 +/- 9%; P = 0.045). Similarly, femoral neck BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (11 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (11 +/- 5 vs. 3 +/- 5%; P < 0.001). Quantitative computed tomography spine BMD increased 1 +/- 7, 61 +/- 31, and 24 +/- 24% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen increased more with teriparatide alone than with both (P < 0.001 for each marker). CONCLUSION: Alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase BMD and bone turnover in women.

Effects of teriparatide treatment and discontinuation in postmenopausal women and eugonadal men with osteoporosis.

CONTEXT: In postmenopausal women, bone mineral density (BMD) declines after teriparatide therapy is stopped. The pattern of BMD loss after teriparatide therapy is stopped in men is less clear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether the pattern of teriparatide-induced bone accrual and post-teriparatide bone loss differs between postmenopausal women and eugonadal men. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cohort substudy. PATIENTS: The study included 14 postmenopausal women and 17 eugonadal men, ages 46-85 yr, with lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD T-scores below -2. INTERVENTION: Teriparatide (37 microg sc daily) was administered for 24 months, followed by 12 months off therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured BMD at various anatomic sites by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, trabecular spine BMD by quantitative computed tomography, and bone turnover markers during the treatment and observation periods. The response to teriparatide administration and discontinuation was compared between females and males. RESULTS: BMD of the spine, femoral neck, total hip, and trabecular spine increased similarly during the treatment period in men and women, whereas BMD at the radius was stable in men but decreased by 8.1 +/- 3.3% in women (P < 0.0001). After teriparatide was stopped, BMD at the posterior-anterior spine decreased by 7.1 +/- 3.8% in women and by 4.1 +/- 3.5% in men (P = 0.036). BMD at the total hip and femoral neck decreased by 3.8 +/- 3.9 and 3.1 +/- 4.3%, respectively, in women but remained stable in men (P < 0.05 for both sites). BMD at the distal radius remained stable in men but increased in women by 1.6 +/- 3.1% (P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide appears to increase BMD similarly in postmenopausal women and eugonadal men with osteoporosis. After teriparatide is stopped, the decline in BMD is greater in women than in men. If confirmed in larger cohorts, these findings would suggest that the indication for immediate antiresorptive therapy after teriparatide may not be as urgent in men as in women.

Effects of teriparatide retreatment in osteoporotic men and women.

CONTEXT: The stimulatory effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover is initially exuberant, but then diminishes. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether retreating with teriparatide after a drug-free period can restore the initial exuberant response to teriparatide. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a planned extension of a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Subjects previously participated in a 30-month randomized trial comparing the effects of alendronate (group 1), teriparatide (group 2), or both (group 3) on BMD and bone turnover in men and women with low BMD (phase 1). Subjects who completed phase 1 on their assigned therapy entered phase 2 (months 30-42), during which teriparatide was stopped in groups 2 and 3. Teriparatide was administered to all subjects during months 42 to 54 (phase 3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared changes in BMD and markers of bone turnover (serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide) between phase 1 and 3 in subjects receiving teriparatide alone. RESULTS: Posterior-anterior and lateral spine BMD increased 12.5 +/- 1.5 and 16.9 +/- 1.7%, respectively, during the first 12 months of teriparatide administration and 5.2 +/- 0.8 and 6.2 +/- 1.8%, respectively, during teriparatide retreatment (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Increases in osteocalcin (P < 0.001), N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (P < 0.001), and N-telopeptide (P < 0.001) were greater during the first period of teriparatide administration. CONCLUSION: The response to teriparatide is attenuated when readministered after a 12-month hiatus.

Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both on bone turnover in osteoporotic men.

CONTEXT: We have previously demonstrated that alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporotic men. The underlying basis for this observation is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether teriparatide increases osteoblast activity when the ability of teriparatide to increase osteoclast activity is suppressed by alendronate. DESIGN: This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at the General Clinical Research Center of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen. RESULTS: In men receiving teriparatide monotherapy (group 2), levels of all bone turnover markers increased markedly during the first 6 months of teriparatide administration and then declined toward baseline during the next 18 months. In men who received combination therapy (group 3), bone turnover marker levels declined in the first 6 months (while receiving alendronate alone) and then returned to baseline levels (N-telopeptide) or above (osteocalcin and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen) after teriparatide was added. Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As with BMD, alendronate impairs the action of teriparatide to increase bone turnover in men.

The effects of parathyroid hormone, alendronate, or both in men with osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Because parathyroid hormone increases both bone formation and bone resorption, it is possible that combining parathyroid hormone with an antiresorptive agent will enhance its effect on bone mineral density. METHODS: We randomly assigned 83 men who were 46 to 85 years of age and had low bone density to receive alendronate (10 mg daily; 28 men), parathyroid hormone (40 microg subcutaneously daily; 27 men), or both (28 men). Alendronate therapy was given for 30 months; parathyroid hormone therapy was begun at month 6. The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, radial shaft, and total body was measured every six months with the use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Trabecular bone mineral density of the lumbar spine was measured at base line and month 30 by means of quantitative computed tomography. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels were measured every six months. The primary end point was the rate of change in the bone mineral density at the posteroanterior spine. RESULTS: The bone mineral density at the lumbar spine increased significantly more in men treated with parathyroid hormone alone than in those in the other groups (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The bone mineral density at the femoral neck increased significantly more in the parathyroid hormone group than in the alendronate group (P<0.001) or the combination-therapy group (P=0.01). The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine increased significantly more in the combination-therapy group than in the alendronate group (P<0.001). At 12 months, changes in the serum alkaline phosphatase level were significantly greater in the parathyroid hormone group than in the alendronate group or the combination-therapy group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate impairs the ability of parathyroid hormone to increase the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck in men. This effect may be attributable to an attenuation of parathyroid hormone-induced stimulation of bone formation by alendronate.