RESUMEN
Leakage of fluids from oil and gas wells is a source of the key greenhouse gas methane, and presents environmental risks, including groundwater contamination. A loss of well integrity can result in fluid leakage into the annular space between subsequent well casings (which is often vented to the atmosphere) or into the surrounding subsurface. In Canada, industry reporting on well integrity is often incomplete, leading government inventories to disagree on emission magnitudes. In this study, we model wellbore methane emissions using industry data in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, finding that differing model assumptions to handle unclear/missing data have a strong influence on estimated emissions. Considering estimates derived from industry reporting and from independent measurement, wellbore emissions in the two provinces range anywhere from 23 to 176 kt of methane, representing 1.7-11.4% of their upstream sector methane emissions. Further, finding over 130 examples of measured leaks seemingly missing from industry reporting, we conclude that wellbore emissions, groundwater contamination, and broader environmental risks are underestimated. We provide recommendations to improve well integrity tracking through data quality assurance measures and increased testing. Finally, we find that ongoing optical gas imaging camera surveys could be an effective tool to augment wellbore testing requirements to minimize industry burden.
RESUMEN
The Canadian government aims to achieve a 40-45 % reduction of oil and gas (O&G) methane (CH4) emissions by 2025, and 75 % by 2030, although recent studies consistently show that Canada's federal inventory underestimates emissions by a factor of 1.4 to 2.0. We conducted aerial mass balance measurements at sixteen upstream O&G facilities in Alberta between September 29 and November 6, 2021, and our measurements revealed that emissions were, on average, 1.7 (standard deviation (SD): 0.6) times higher than the reported emissions for the same year. On a subsequent campaign from August 12 to September 27, 2022, we focused on understudied O&G sectors covering 24 midstream and end-use facilities. These sites were found to be emitting, on average, 3.4 (SD: 1.1) times more CH4 than reported. By extrapolating our measurements to Alberta, we found that underground gas storage contributed to 1.6 % of provincial O&G emissions, followed by natural gas power stations/refineries less than 1.0 %. The widespread underreporting of CH4 emissions highlights the necessity for more empirical measurements of midstream and end-use facilities.
RESUMEN
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that accounts for one-quarter of the world's radiative forcing. Methane emissions from the natural gas sector are prevalent throughout the natural gas (NG) chain. Studies have shown that methane emissions from post-meter uses of natural gas are vastly understated. A surge in the number of natural gas users, for example, would amplify the climate impact of methane emissions during the installation of natural gas meters. Thus, quantifying methane emissions during the installation of natural gas meters is critical in light of severe global climate change and urgent reduction targets. In this study, we used a mass balance approach to calculate methane emissions during the separate installation of 1444 residential natural gas meters and 51 commercial natural gas meters. Our results revealed the methane emission had a fat tail distribution. Specifically, the estimated mean methane emissions for household users were 0.008 (0.001-0.022) kg per household and 0.192 (0.013-0.816) kg per commercial user. Extrapolating these statistics to the whole of China, total emissions from 2007 to 2021 were 3.80 million metric tons (MMt) CH4, with an annual average of 0.25 MMt. Notably, in terms of economic development and population size, the provinces with the highest methane emissions were concentrated in the southeast. Our findings close a gap in measuring CH4 emissions in China across the natural gas chain and provide data to support the reduction targets set and the development of reduction technologies.
RESUMEN
Natural gas is increasingly seen as the fossil fuel of choice for China as it transitions to renewable sources. The significant development of China's LNG vehicle application and fueling stations and the urgency of climate changes make it particularly important to quantify methane emission from LNG stations, where the data are extremely rare. We carried out a pilot study on direct measurement and quantitative analysis of methane emission from five LNG fueling stations located in Shandong, China following the standard stationary EPA OTM 33A method. The measured methane emission of these five stations vary from 0.01 to 8.76 kg/h. The loss rates vary from 0.004 to 0.257%. We demonstrated that the emission from LNG stations consist of continuous and intermittent contents. The intermittent emission shows a strong temporal variation. If a station is only monitored for 20 min, it may either under-estimate or over-estimate the total emission. Both the distribution of emission events and total emission rates among different stations are highly skewed. We found that these LNG fueling station emission can be categorized into 3 grades, as low, medium and high, corresponding to emission rates below 0.1 kg/h; between 0.1 and 1 kg/h and above 1 kg/h, which can be characterized by the measured average methane concentration enhancement.
RESUMEN
Methane, as the second most emitted greenhouse gas (GHG), has a warming potential of approximately 86 times that of carbon dioxide within 20 years. Quantifying methane emissions is helpful to the country's emission reduction efforts. However, currently, there is a lack of measurement data of methane emissions from natural gas fueling stations in China. In this study, a downwind quantification approach was employed to directly measure the methane emissions of nine compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling stations in East China according to the Environmental Protection Agency's Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A). Moreover, methane concentrations were also measured near the nozzle of the refueling dispenser and the process equipment in the station. The methane emissions of the nine stations lied within the range of 0.11-0.83 kg/h, and the distribution of the emission rate was skewed. It was found that the emissions from gas fueling stations could be divided into intermittent emissions and continuous emissions, of which the intermittent emissions were the main source of methane.
