RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Target gastrointestinal cancers (GICs), encompassing esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), originate within a single readily accessible luminal organ system and are diagnosable using endoscopy. However, endoscopy is an invasive procedure with low compliance and no plasma-based DNA methylation assay for the early detection of GICs. METHODS: Nine potential DNA methylation markers were identified and evaluated in tissue (n=60) and plasma (n=155) cohorts to select the most suitable markers. A training cohort (n=244) and a validation cohort (n=199), including GICs patients, benign tumors, gastrointestinal polyps, and controls, were enrolled to develop and validate a DNA methylation panel. An independent prospective cohort (n=158) was used to validate the panel's performance and compare it with blood protein tumor markers. RESULTS: Six out of nine candidate methylation markers with excellent discrimination abilities in both tissue and plasma cohorts were selected for the DNA methylation panel. The panel demonstrated high AUC values of 0.937 (EC), 0.968 (GC), and 0.987 (CRC) in training cohort, and achieved AUC values of 0.921 (EC), 0.921 (GC), and 0.959 (CRC) in validation cohort. Notably, it achieved impressive AUC values of 0.971 and 0.843 for identifying stage I GICs in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In the prospective cohort, the six-marker panel showed comparable AUC values to CEA, AFP, and CA19-9 (0.935, 0.769, 0.663, and 0.668, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study successfully developed and validated a novel, robust, sensitive, and specific plasma-based DNA methylation panel, offering a promising strategy for the early detection of GICs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Metilación de ADN , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/genéticaRESUMEN
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in China, with the 5-year survival rate reaching less than 30%, because most cases were diagnosed and treated at the advanced stage. However, there is still a lack of low-cost, efficient, and accurate non-invasive methods for the early detection of EC at present. Methods: A total of 48 EC plasma and 101 control plasma samples were collected in a training cohort from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021, and seven cancer-related DNA methylation markers (ELMO1, ZNF582, FAM19A4, PAX1, C13orf18, JAM3 and TERT) were tested in these samples to select potential markers. In total, 20 EC, 10 gastric cancer (GC), 10 colorectal cancer (CRC), and 20 control plasma samples were collected in a validation cohort to evaluate the two-gene panel. Results: ZNF582, FAM19A4, JAM3, or TERT methylation in plasma was shown to significantly distinguish EC and control subjects (p < 0.05), and the combination of ZNF582 and FAM19A4 methylation was the two-gene panel that exhibited the best performance for the detection of EC with 60.4% sensitivity (95% CI: 45.3%-73.9%) and 83.2% specificity (95% CI: 74.1%-89.6%) in the training cohort. The performance of this two-gene panel showed no significant difference between different age and gender groups. When the two-gene panel was combined with CEA, the sensitivity for EC detection was further improved to 71.1%. In the validation cohort, the sensitivity of the two-gene panel for detecting EC, GC, and CRC was 60.0%, 30.0%, and 30.0%, respectively, with a specificity of 90.0%. Conclusion: The identified methylation marker panel provided a potential non-invasive strategy for EC detection, but further validation should be performed in more clinical centers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stool DNA test has been emerged as an effective noninvasive method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but the real-world performance of stool DNA test in Chinese population has rarely been reported. METHODS: A total of 36,527 subjects were recruited in Haining City from January 2021 to December 2021. Participants underwent primary screening by taking both two-samples fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) and high-risk factor questionnaire (HRFQ), and those who tested either positive by FITs or evaluated to be high risk by HRFQ were recommended to undertake subsequent stool DNA test and colonoscopy. RESULTS: Of 36,527 participants, 34,778 (95%) completed both HRFQ and FITs, 9947 (29%) showed positive results during primary screening, and the colonoscopy compliance rate was 49%. Of primary screening positives, 8733 (88%) completed stool sample collections, and colonoscopy results from 4293 eligible participants were used for analyzing the performance of stool DNA test. The sensitivities for detecting CRC and advanced adenomas (AA) were 100% (95% CI: 60-100%) and 40% (95% CI: 34-46%), and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.961 (95% CI:0.954-0.967) and 0.625 (95% CI: 0.609-0.641), respectively. The specificity of stool DNA test was 84% (95% CI: 82-85%). The false-positive rate for stool DNA test is about 10% less than that of primary screening. CONCLUSION: Stool DNA test is a cost-effective and promising alternative strategy for CRC screening in China.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , ADN , Tamizaje Masivo/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGC) is an important cause of cancer death in China, with low five-year survival rates due to the majority of UGC patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop cost-effective, reliable and non-invasive methods for the early detection of UGC. METHODS: A novel plasma-based methylation panel combining simultaneous detection of three methylated biomarkers (ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2) and an internal control gene were developed and used to examine plasma samples from 186 UGC patients and 190 control subjects. RESULTS: The results indicated excellent PCR amplification efficiency and reproducibility of ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 in the range of 10-100,000 copies per PCR reaction of fully methylated genomic DNA. The methylation levels of ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 were significantly higher in UGC samples than those in control subjects. The sensitivities of ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 alone for UGC detection were 32.3%, 61.3% and 30.6%, respectively; when three markers were combined, the sensitivity was improved to 71.0%, with a specificity of 90.0%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.870 (95% CI: 0.832-0.902). CONCLUSION: Methylated ELMO1, ZNF582 and TFPI2 were specific for UGC and the three-methylated gene panel provided an alternative non-invasive choice for UGC early detection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ColoDefense1.0 assay has demonstrated its excellent sensitivity and specificity for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) by detecting the methylation levels of SDC2 and SEPT9, while exhibited limitations on relatively large sample capacity required and limited detection throughput by applying triplicate PCR reactions for each sample. In this study, ColoDefense1.0 was simplified and optimized into ColoDefense2.0 in a single PCR reaction. METHODS: A total 529 stool specimens were collected, and 244 CRC patients, 34 patients with advanced adenomas (AA), 64 with small polyps (SP) and 187 control subjects were divided in training and validation cohorts. Methylation levels of SEPT9 and SDC2 were examined by qPCR reactions in triplicate or single. RESULTS: The stool DNA quantity stored in preservative buffer at 37 °C up to 7 days exhibited no significant decrease. In the training cohort, when the number of replicates reduced from 3 to 1, the overall performance of ColoDefense2.0 was identical to that of ColoDefense1.0, showing sensitivities of 71.4% for AA and 90.8% for all stage CRC with a specificity of 92.9%. In the validation cohort, sensitivities of SP, AA and CRC using ColoDefense2.0 were 25.0%, 55.0% and 88.2%, increased from 14.1% (20.3%), 40.0% (40.0%) and 79.4% (67.6%) using SDC2 (SEPT9) alone; along with an overall specificity of 90.2%, decreased from 94.1% (95.1%) using SDC2 (SEPT9) alone. CONCLUSION: The simplified ColoDefense test maintained the overall performance while reduced the number of PCR reactions to 1/3, and provided an effective and convenient tool to detect early CRC and precancerous lesions and potentially improve the compliance of screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Sindecano-2 , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , ADN , Metilación de ADN , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sindecano-2/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer death and an important barrier to increasing life expectancy in China. Early detection of GC can significantly reduce its mortality rate. METHODS: A new plasma-based multiplex DNA methylation assay combining simultaneous detection of three biomarkers (KCNQ5, C9orf50 and CLIP4) and one control gene (ACTB) was developed. It was used to examine 12 paired tissue samples and a training cohort of 151 plasma samples. Its performance was subsequently confirmed in validation cohort 1 (n = 105) and validation cohort 2 (n = 139). RESULTS: Three methylation markers showed significantly higher methylation levels in GC tissues than in paired adjacent tissues. The assay showed a sensitivity of 67.9 % with a specificity of 86.6 % for GC detection in the training cohort, and the AUC was 0.786 (95 % CI: 0.701-0.855). The methylation levels in GC patients were significantly higher than those in benign gastric tumors and in control group. Meanwhile, the assay achieved a sensitivity of 65.5 % with a specificity of 90.0 % in the validation cohort 1, and the AUC was 0.805 (95 % CI: 0.716-0.876). In the validation cohort 2, its sensitivity and specificity were 73.7 % and 84.1 %, respectively, and the AUC was 0.851 (95 % CI: 0.776-0.909). CONCLUSION: The plasma-based multiplex DNA methylation assay was highly specific for GC early detection. It has the potential to become an alternative approach to improve diagnosis of GC in the clinics.
RESUMEN
Background: A number of plasma methylated DNA biomarkers related to colorectal cancer (CRC) have been identified. However, the effect of methylation level in leukocytes on plasma-based methylation test was rarely reported. Methods: Blood samples from 213 individuals including 91 CRC patients were collected and separated into 3.5 mL of plasma and paired leukocyte fractions. DNA were extracted from plasma and leukocytes and bisulfite converted, followed by ColoDefense test that detects methylated SEPT9 (mSEPT9) and methylated SDC2 (mSDC2) simultaneously in a single qPCR reaction. Results: Both mSEPT9 and mSDC2 levels in leukocytes exhibited no significant difference among CRC, benign tumors and healthy controls. However, mSEPT9 and mSDC2 levels in plasma were significantly higher in CRC group than those in other groups. The sensitivities of mSEPT9 and mSDC2 alone for detecting CRC with plasma samples were 75.8% and 60.4% with specificities of 94.7% and 86.8%, respectively. These two markers in combination exhibited an improved sensitivity of 85.7% for CRC detection with a specificity of 86.8%, mostly attributable to increased sensitivity of 81.8% for detecting stage 0-II CRC. AUC values for mSEPT9 and mSDC2 alone were 0.864 (95% CI: 0.798 - 0.929) and 0.796 (95% CI: 0.719 - 0.874), respectively, but improved to 0.972 (95% CI: 0.949 - 0.996) when combined for ColoDefense test. Conclusions: The leukocytes gDNA will not affect the performance of plasma ColoDefense test, and plasma ColoDefense test exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in a validation set, demonstrating its potential as a non-invasive and cost-effective method for CRC early detection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide and in China. Early CRC screening is the best approach to reduce its incidence and mortality rates. The ColoDefense test, a multiplex qPCR assay simultaneously detecting both methylated SEPT9 and SDC2 genes, has demonstrated improved clinical performance on either methylation biomarker alone for CRC screening with both blood and stool samples. METHOD: Leftover blood chemistry test samples from 125 CRC, 35 advanced adenoma, and 35 small polyp patients and 92 healthy control subjects were examined by the ColoDefense test. Among these samples, the levels of three circulating tumor markers, CEA, AFP, and CA19-9, were also measured for 106 CRC, 28 advanced adenoma, and 20 small polyp patients and all control subjects. RESULTS: Due to the smaller volume and extended storage in nonfrozen state, the ColoDefense test with these samples exhibited reduced performance for all stages of CRC and advanced adenomas. The performance of CEA, AFP, and CA19-9 and their various combinations was also evaluated for CRC screening to identify the tumor marker combinations with the best performance. When combined with the ColoDefense test, the identified combinations did improve the clinical performance. CONCLUSION: These results suggested a rational path towards developing a CRC screening method that takes advantage of leftover blood chemistry test samples. The successful development of such a method will undoubtedly help promote early CRC screening by increasing its accessibility for the general public.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and precancerous lesion is vitally important for mitigating CRC morbidity and mortality. Aberrant DNA methylations in certain promoter regions have been identified to be closely associated with CRC development and progression, suggesting their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for early detection. In this study, we evaluated the performance of methylated CLIP4 in stool specimens as a potential biomarker for CRC detection. METHODS: A total of 321 subjects out of 365 enrolled participants were included in the final analysis, including 154 CRC patients, 23 advanced adenoma (AA) patients, 49 small polyp (SP) patients, and 95 healthy controls. CLIP4 methylation level was examined by qPCR with bisulfite converted DNA purified from approximately 5 g stool specimen. RESULTS: Methylated CLIP4 test showed high sensitivities of 78.3% (95% CI: 55.8%-91.7%) and 90.3% (95% CI: 84.2%-94.3%) for detecting AA and CRC, respectively, with a specificity of 88.4% (95% CI: 79.8%-93.8%). CLIP4 methylation level discriminated AA and CRC patients from control subjects with area under the curve values of 0.892 (95% CI: 0.795-0.988) and 0.961 (95% CI: 0.938-0.983). Further analysis indicated no significant difference in sensitivities among different ages, genders, stages, locations, sides, tumor sizes and differentiation statuses. CONCLUSIONS: Methylated CLIP4 showed a strong potential as a noninvasive biomarker for early CRC detection.
RESUMEN
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of combination of methylated SFRP2 and methylated SDC2 (SpecColon test) in stool specimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) early detection and to optimize the cut-off value of methylated SFRP2 and methylated SDC2. Methods: Approximately 5 g of stool specimen each was collected from 420 subjects (291 in the training cohort and 129 in the validation cohort). Stool DNA was extracted and bisulfite-converted, followed by detection of methylated level of SFRP2 and SDC2. Youden index was employed to determine the cut-off value. Results: The whole operating time for stool SpecColon test takes less than 5 hours. The limit of detection of combination of methylated SFRP2 and methylated SDC2 was as low as 5 pg per reaction. The optimized cut-off value was methylated SFRP2 analyzed by 3/3 rule and methylated SDC2 analyzed by 2/3 rule. In the training cohort, the sensitivities of stool SpecColon test for detecting AA and early stage CRC (stage 0-II) were 53.8% (95% CI: 26.1%-79.6%) and 89.1% (95% CI: 77.1%-95.5%) with a specificity of 93.5% (95% CI: 87.2%-96.9%), and the AUC for CRC diagnosis was 0.879 (95% CI: 0.830-0.928). Similar performance was achieved by SpecColon test also in the validation cohort, where its sensitivities for detecting AA and early stage CRC (stage 0-II) were 61.5% (95% CI: 32.3-84.9%) and 88.5% (95% CI: 68.5%-97.0%) with a specificity of 89.5% (95% CI: 74.3-96.7%). Conclusion: Combined detections of methylated SFRP2 and methylated SDC2 in stool samples demonstrated high sensitivities and specificity for the detection of AA and early stage CRC. Therefore, this combination has the potential to become an accurate and cost-effective tool for CRC early detection.
RESUMEN
Intramolecular secondary structures within templates have been shown to lower PCR performance. Whereas many approaches have been developed to mitigate such impairment on PCR, their effects can vary greatly depending on template sequences. Here we present a novel, universally effective approach to improve PCR performance involving specifically designed oligonucleotides called disruptors. A disruptor contained three functional components, an anchor designed to initiate template binding, an effector to disrupt intramolecular secondary structure, and a 3' blocker to prevent its elongation by DNA polymerase. A functional mechanism for a disruptor to improve PCR efficiency was proposed where anchor first binds to template followed by effector-mediated strand displacement to unwind intramolecular secondary structure. Such a mechanism was consistent with the observation that anchor played a more critical role for disruptor function. As an example of potential disruptor applications, inverted terminal repeat sequences of recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors were successfully amplified in the presence of disruptors despite their well-known reputation as some of the most difficult templates for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing due to their ultra-stable T-shaped hairpin structures. In stark contrast, both DMSO and betaine, two PCR additives routinely used to facilitate PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of GC-rich templates, did not demonstrate any improving effect.
Asunto(s)
Oligonucleótidos/química , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Cartilla de ADN/química , ADN Polimerasa Dirigida por ADN/metabolismo , Dependovirus , Humanos , Indicadores y Reactivos/química , Estructura Molecular , Moldes Genéticos , Secuencias Repetidas TerminalesRESUMEN
As a standard molecular biology technique, PCR uses DNA polymerase to detect, amplify and manipulate DNA targets. Due to its effect of exponential amplification, PCR can achieve high sensitivity required for detecting targets of low abundance. Therefore, it has become the method of choice for the majority of nucleic acid-based tests. In PCR reactions, DNA templates are first unwound into single strands, followed by a quick temperature drop when transient intramolecular secondary structures may form first within the single-stranded templates due to reaction kinetics. In this study, we showed that the adverse effects of stem-loop structures on PCR performance were directly correlated with their thermal stability. Moreover, fractions of intermediate PCR products of templates with stable stem-loop structures were significantly shorter than those without. It was further demonstrated that when encountering the duplex region of such a structure during the PCR extension step, the endonuclease activity of Taq DNA polymerase mediated by its 5'-3' exonuclease activity could digest template strand, resulting in stem-loop structure unwinding and subsequent completion of replication to produce truncated products. This work thus provided some new mechanistic insights into the complex nature of PCR assays, a frequently encountered but neglected aspect of this widely used technique.
Asunto(s)
ADN/metabolismo , Endonucleasas/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Polimerasa Taq/metabolismo , ADN/química , ADN/genética , ADN/aislamiento & purificación , Cartilla de ADN/genética , Conformación de Ácido Nucleico , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Moldes GenéticosRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the second leading cause of new cancer cases and the fifth of cancer deaths in China, and early detection is the most effective way to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. A number of methylated DNA biomarkers have been found to associate with CRC and precancerous lesions in stool samples, indicating stool methylated DNA biomarkers are potential tools for CRC early detection. In this study, approximately 5 g of stool specimen was collected from 230 subjects (124 in the training set and 106 in the validation set). Stool DNA was extracted and bisulfite-converted, followed by ColoDefense test, a multiplex qPCR assay, that simultaneously detects methylated SEPT9 (mSEPT9) and methylated SDC2 (mSDC2). Youden index was employed to determine the cut-off value of ColoDefense test for stool specimens. In the training set, the optimized cut-off value of stool ColoDefense test was: mSEPT9 analyzed with 3/3 algorithm and mean mSEPT9 Ct values of <38, or mSDC2 with 2/3 algorithm. Stool ColoDefense test achieved Youden indexes of 79.9 and 57.4% in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas (AA), respectively. Its sensitivities in the training set for AA and CRC were 66.7% (95% CI: 24.1-94.0%) and 89.1% (95% CI: 77.1-95.5%) with a 90.8% (95% CI: 80.3-96.2%) specificity, and AUC was 0.956 (95% CI: 0.924-0.988). In the validation set, its sensitivities for AA and CRC were 66.7% (95% CI: 24.1-94.0%) and 92.3% (95% CI: 78.0-98.0%) with a 93.2% (95% CI: 82.7-97.8%) specificity, and AUC was 0.977 (95% CI: 0.952-1.000). Positive detection rate of stool ColoDefense test has been found to be independent of age, gender, tumor location, and tumor size. In conclusion, stool ColoDefense test demonstrated high sensitivities and specificity for the detection of AA and CRC. Therefore, it has the potential to become a low-cost, convenient, and highly effective tool for CRC early detection.
RESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common type of malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract worldwide. Plasma methylated SEPT9 test has been used clinically for CRC screening for several years, but the study about the performance comparison between plasma and stool has rarely been reported. In this study, 124 plasma samples, 100 stool samples, and 60 sets of plasma and paired stool samples were collected and tested by a methylated SEPT9 test in three PCR replicates. The results indicated methylated SEPT9 levels in stool samples were significant higher than those in plasma samples (p < 0.0001). When a plasma sample was called positive if 1 out of 3 PCR replicates was positive and a stool sample was called positive if 3 out of 3 PCR replicates were positive with a mean Cp value of less than 40.0, stool methylated SEPT9 test achieved similar sensitivity (83.3% vs 85.6%) and specificity (92.1% vs 90.1%) to those by plasma methylated SEPT9 test, and the overall concordance rate is 78.3%. However, stool methylated SEPT9 test showed 35.9 and 7.9% improvement in detecting advanced adenomas (AA) and stage I-II CRC in comparison to plasma methylated SEPT9 test. The AUC for plasma methylated SEPT9 and stool methylated SEPT9 in detecting CRC were 0.885 (95% CI: 0.832-0.938) and 0.935 (95% CI: 0.895-0.975), respectively. In conclusion, stool methylated SEPT9 test showed higher sensitivities for detection AA and early stage CRC compared with plasma methylated SEPT9 test, and stool methylated SEPT9 test may be a more suitable tool for early stage CRC screening.
RESUMEN
Gastric cancer (GC) is fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer in China. More than 80% of GC are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to low uptake rate of invasive screening method. The performance of methylated SFRP2 test was evaluated in 236 plasma samples, including 92 patients with GC, 16 intestinal metaplasia patients, 26 gastric fundic gland polyp patients, 13 small adenoma patients, 39 hyperplastic polyp patients, and 50 control patients. The sensitivity of plasma methylated SFRP2 was compared to serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, and CA242 results in 79 patients with GC. The sensitivities for detecting GC and gastric intestinal metaplasia by methylated SFRP2 test were 60.9% and 56.3% with a specificity of 86.0%. Methylated SFRP2 test had significantly higher positive detection rate for patients with GC than gastric fundic gland polyp, small adenoma, and hyperplastic polyp patients. In 79 patients with GC, the sensitivities of CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, and CA242 for detecting GC were 22.8%, 16.5%, 12.7%, and 11.4%. In comparison, the sensitivity of methylated SFRP2 test for detecting GC was 58.2%. Plasma methylated SFRP2 test may become a valuable tool for the noninvasive detection of GC and precursor lesions and showed higher sensitivity than serum tumor markers.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Metilación de ADN , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígenos de Carbohidratos Asociados a Tumores/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/sangre , Proteínas de la Membrana/química , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Neoplasias Gástricas/sangre , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Methylated SFRP2 was previously reported as a non-invasive biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection with a relatively low sensitivity for early stage CRC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new plasma based CRC screening assay, SpecColon test, which tested methylated SFRP2 and SDC2 simultaneously in a single qPCR reaction, in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas (AA). METHOD: One milliliter plasma of 122 CRC patients, 12 AA patients, 93 patients with benign polyps, and 91 normal individuals were collected from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, and all samples were examined by SpecColon test. RESULTS: The sensitivities for detecting AA and CRC by methylated SFRP2 alone were 50.0% (95% CI: 22.2-77.7%) and 63.1% (95% CI: 53.9-71.5%) with a specificity of 90.1% (95% CI: 81.6-95.1%). The sensitivities by methylated SDC2 alone were 33.3% (95% CI: 11.3-64.6%) and 56.6% (95% CI: 47.3-65.4%) with a specificity of 95.6% (95% CI: 88.5-98.6%). However, when methylated SFRP2 and methylated SDC2 were combined, the sensitivities for AA and CRC detection improved to 58.3% (95% CI: 28.6-83.5%) and 76.2% (95% CI: 67.5-83.3%) with a specificity of 87.9% (95% CI: 79.0-93.5%). The positive detection rates of benign polyp group and normal control group showed no significant difference (p > 0.01), whereas AA and CRC groups had significantly higher positive detection rates than normal individual group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The sensitivities for AA and early stage CRC by combined test of methylated SFRP2 and methylated SDC2, the so called SpecColon test, improved upon those by either biomarker alone without significant impact on the specificity. It has the potential to become a powerful, convenient and highly effective screening tool for early CRC screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Proteínas de la Membrana/sangre , Sindecano-2/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Metilación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation has emerged as a class of promising biomarkers for early colorectal cancer (CRC) detection, but the performance of methylated C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 in stool DNA has never been evaluated. METHODS: Methylation specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for methylated C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 were developed. The methylation levels of C9orf50 and KCNQ5 in 198 CRC patients, 20 advanced adenoma (AA) patients, 101 small polyp (SP) patients, and 141 no evidence of disease (NED) subjects were analyzed. RESULTS: The methylation levels of both KCNQ5 and C9orf50 genes were significantly higher in CRC and AA groups than those in SP and NED groups, but showed no significant difference among different stages of CRC. The sensitivities of methylated KCNQ5 and methylated C9orf50 for CRC detection were 77.3% (95% CI: 70.7-82.8%) and 85.9% (95% CI: 80.0-90.2%) with specificities of 91.5% (95% CI: 85.3-95.3%) and 95.0% (95% CI: 89.7-97.8%), respectively. When C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 were combined, the clinical performance for CRC detection was similar to that of methylated C9orf50 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Stool DNA based methylated C9orf50 test has the potential to become an alternative approach for CRC screening and prevention.
RESUMEN
Methylated SEPT9 showed relatively low sensitivity in detecting early stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenomas (AA) in plasma. Combination of multiple biomarkers was an effective strategy to improve sensitivity in early stage cancer diagnosis and screening. A new qPCR-based assay combining the detection of methylated SEPT9 and SDC2 (ColoDefense test) was used. Methylation statuses of SEPT9 and SDC2 were examined in 40 sets of cancer tissues and paired adjacent tissues, 10 adenomatous polyps and 3 hyperplastic polyps (HP). Then evaluated with 384 plasma samples, including 117 CRC patients, 23 AA patients, 78 small polyps patients, and 166 normal individuals. The limit of detection of ColoDefense was about 25 pg per reaction. Both SEPT9 and SDC2 were shown by ColoDefense to be heavily methylated in CRC tissues when compared to paired paracancerous tissues and HP (P < .01). The sensitivities for detecting AA and stage I CRC by plasma SEPT9 methylation alone were 12.1% and 65.0%, and those by plasma SDC2 methylation alone were 43.5% and 55.0%. In comparison, the sensitivities to detect AA and stage I CRC by ColoDefense improved to 47.8% and 80.0%. The overall sensitivity of ColoDefense in detecting CRC was 88.9% (95% CI: 81.4%-93.7%) with a specificity of 92.8% (95% CI: 87.4%-96.0%). Detection of the combinatorial biomarker of methylated SEPT9 and/or SDC2 is a powerful, convenient and highly effective strategy for early CRC screening with high sensitivity and specificity.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Metilación de ADN , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Septinas/genética , Sindecano-2/genética , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al Calcio/química , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/química , Proteínas de Microfilamentos/química , Estructura Terciaria de Proteína , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales , Secuencias de Aminoácidos , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Humanos , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intracelular , Proteínas con Dominio LIM , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta , Estructura Secundaria de Proteína , Soluciones , CalponinasRESUMEN
Human coactosin-like protein (CLP) is a small (MW approximately 17 kDa) evolutionarily conserved actin-binding protein. It can bind to actin filaments but not globular actin and belongs to the fourth class of ADF-H-domain-containing proteins. Human CLP can also bind to 5LO, which plays an important role in cellular leukotriene synthesis. Although the structure of hCLP has been determined by both NMR and X-ray experiments, how hCLP binds to the actin filament is still a controversial question. To obtain insights into the structure of the complex, we studied the three-dimensional structure and backbone dynamics of hCLP using multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Guided by the solution structure of the protein, a series of site-directed mutants were generated and their F-actin-binding activities were measured by high-speed cosedimentation assays. Furthermore, the structure model of the hCLP-F-actin complex was proposed using computational docking with the docking results filtered by the mutation data. Several previously untested residues (including T66, L89, R91, K102, D116 and E119) in hCLP were found important for the F-actin-binding activity. The extended region of beta4-beta5 of hCLP (residue 66-75) was found very flexible and very important for F-actin binding. The C-terminal residues of hCLP were not involved in F-actin binding, which was different from UNC-60B. Based on our hCLP-F-actin-binding model, different affinities of the four classes of ADF-H domain containing proteins for F-actin were explained.