40 Gray in 5 Fractions for Salvage Reirradiation of Spine Lesions Previously Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A retrospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of reirradiation to 40 Gy in 5 fractions (reSBRT) in patients previously treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy to the spine was performed. METHODS: We identified 102 consecutive patients treated with reSBRT for 105 lesions between 3/2013 and 8/2021. Sixty-three patients (61.8%) were treated to the same vertebral level, and 39 (38.2%) to overlapping immediately adjacent levels. Local control was defined as the absence of progression within the treated target volume. The probability of local progression was estimated using a cumulative incidence curve. Death without local progression was considered a competing risk. RESULTS: Most patients had extensive metastatic disease (54.9%) and were treated to the thoracic spine (53.8%). The most common regimen in the first course of stereotactic body radiotherapy was 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and the median time to reSBRT was 16.4 months. At the time of simulation, 44% of lesions had advanced epidural disease. Accordingly, 80% had myelogram simulations. Both the vertebral body and posterior elements were treated in 86% of lesions. At a median follow-up time of 13.2 months, local failure occurred in 10 lesions (9.5%). The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of local failure were 4.8% and 6%, respectively. Seven patients developed radiation-related neuropathy, and 1 patient developed myelopathy. The vertebral compression fracture rate was 16.7%. CONCLUSION: In patients with extensive disease involvement, reSBRT of spine metastases with 40 Gy in 5 fractions seems to be safe and effective. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and fractionation in this clinical scenario.

Comparative Evaluation of Proton Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Brachial Plexus Sparing in the Comprehensive Reirradiation of High-Risk Recurrent Breast Cancer.

Purpose: Recurrent or new primary breast cancer requiring comprehensive regional nodal irradiation after prior radiation therapy (RT) to the supraclavicular area and upper axilla is challenging due to cumulative brachial plexus (BP) dose tolerance. We assessed BP dose sparing achieved with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: In an institutional review board-approved planning study, all patients with ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer treated with PBS-PT re-RT (PBT1) with at least partial BP overlap from prior photon RT were identified. Comparative VMAT plans (XRT1) using matched BP dose constraints were developed. A second pair of proton (PBT2) and VMAT (XRT2) plans using standardized target volumes were created, applying uniform prescription dose of 50.4 per 1.8 Gy and a maximum BP constraint <25 Gy. Incidence of brachial plexopathy was also assessed. Results: Ten consecutive patients were identified. Median time between RT courses was 48 months (15-276). Median first, second, and cumulative RT doses were 50.4 Gy (range, 42.6-60.0), 50.4 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) (45.0-64.4), and 102.4 Gy (RBE) (95.0-120.0), respectively. Median follow-up was 15 months (5-33) and 18 months for living patients (11-33) Mean BP max was 37.5 Gy (RBE) for PBT1 and 36.9 Gy for XRT1. Target volume coverage of V85% (volume receiving 85% of prescription dose), V90%, and V95% were numerically lower for XRT1 versus PBT1. Similarly, axilla I-III and supraclavicular area coverage were significantly higher for PBT2 than XRT2 at dose levels of V55%, V65%, V75%, V85%, and V95%. Only axilla I V55% did not reach significance (P = .06) favoring PBS-PT. Two patients with high cumulative BPmax (95.2 Gy [RBE], 101.6 Gy [RBE]) developed brachial plexopathy symptoms with ulnar nerve distribution neuropathy without pain or weakness (1 of 2 had symptom resolution after 6 months without intervention). Conclusions: PBS-PT improved BP sparing and target volume coverage versus VMAT. For patients requiring comprehensive re-RT for high-risk, nonmetastatic breast cancer recurrence with BP overlap and reasonable expectation for prolonged life expectancy, PBT may be the preferred treatment modality.

Proton Reirradiation for High-Risk Recurrent or New Primary Breast Cancer.

Radiotherapy is an integral component of multidisciplinary breast cancer care. Given how commonly radiotherapy is used in the treatment of breast cancer, many patients with recurrences have received previous radiotherapy. Patients with new primary breast cancer may also have received previous radiotherapy to the thoracic region. Curative doses and comprehensive field photon reirradiation (reRT) have often been avoided in these patients due to concerns for severe toxicities to organs-at-risk (OARs), such as the heart, lungs, brachial plexus, and soft tissue. However, many patients may benefit from definitive-intent reRT, such as patients with high-risk disease features such as lymph node involvement and dermal/epidermal invasion. Proton therapy is a potentially advantageous treatment option for delivery of reRT due to its lack of exit dose and greater conformality that allow for enhanced non-target tissue sparing of previously irradiated tissues. In this review, we discuss the clinical applications of proton therapy for patients with breast cancer requiring reRT, the currently available literature and how it compares to historical photon reRT outcomes, treatment planning considerations, and questions in this area warranting further study. Given the dosimetric advantages of protons and the data reported to date, proton therapy is a promising option for patients who would benefit from the added locoregional disease control provided by reRT for recurrent or new primary breast cancer.

Safety and feasibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment combined with radiotherapy in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, there are conflicting data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy, and no consensus guidelines exist to guide practice. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and feasibility of CDK4/6i treatment with radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, for studies in advanced/metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and radiotherapy with the provided safety data on the occurrence of toxicity. The main outcomes were safety (grade 3-5 adverse events), CDK 4/6i dose reduction, and the discontinuation rate due to toxicity. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 1133 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were included. Among them, 617 pts received CDK4/6i and radiotherapy; the median follow-up was 17.0 months (IQR 9.2 - 18.0), and the median age was 58.8 years (IQR 55.5---62.5). The pooled prevalence of severe hematologic toxicity was 29.4% (95% CI 14.0% - 47.4%; I2 = 93%; τ2 = 0.084; p < 0.01 and severe non-hematologic toxicity was 2.8% (95% CI 1.1% - 4.8%; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.0; p = 0.67). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i dose reduction was 24.0% (95% CI 11.1% - 39.4%; I2 = 90%; τ2 = 0.052; p < 0.01) with no difference between CDK4/6i plus RT vs. CDK4/6i (odds ratio of 0.934; 95% CI 0.66 - 1.33; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.0; p = 0.56). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i discontinuation due to toxicity was 2.3% (95% CI 0.4% - 5.2%; I2 = 23%; τ2 = 0.002; p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that radiotherapy in addition to CDK4/6i treatment in breast cancer patients is generally safe and well tolerated and remains a viable treatment option.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Association of Dosimetric Parameters With Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Purpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery offers a well-tolerated adjuvant radiation therapy option for patients with breast cancer. We sought to describe patient-reported acute toxicity as a function of salient dosimetric parameters during and after an APBI regimen of 40 Gy in 10 once-daily fractions. Methods and Materials: From June 2019 to July 2020, patients undergoing APBI were assigned a weekly, response-adapted, patient reported outcomes-common terminology criteria for adverse events-based acute toxicity assessment. Patients reported acute toxicity during treatment and for up to 8 weeks after treatment. Dosimetric treatment parameters were collected. Descriptive statistics and univariable analyses were used to summarize patient-reported outcomes and their correlation to corresponding dosimetric measures, respectively. Results: Overall, 55 patients who received APBI completed a total of 351 assessments. Median planning target volume was 210 cc (range, 64-580 cc), and median planning target volume:ipsilateral breast volume ratio was 0.17 (range, 0.05-0.44). Overall, 22% of patients reported moderate breast enlargement and 27% reported maximum skin toxicity as severe or very severe. Furthermore, 35% of patients reported fatigue, and 44% of patients reported pain in the radiated area as moderate to very severe. Median time to first report of any moderate to very severe symptom was 10 days (interquartile range, 6-27 days). By 8 weeks after APBI, most patients reported resolution of symptoms, with 16% reporting residual moderate symptoms. Upon univariable analysis, none of the ascertained salient dosimetric parameters were associated with maximum symptoms or with the presence of moderate to very severe toxicity. Conclusions: Weekly assessments during and after APBI showed that patients experienced moderate to very severe toxicities, most commonly skin toxicity, but that these typically resolved by 8 weeks after radiation therapy. More comprehensive evaluations among larger cohorts are warranted to define the precise dosimetric parameters that correspond to outcomes of interest.

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: matched cohort analysis of recurrence and survival.

PURPOSE: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer, defined as mammary carcinoma with squamous or mesenchymal differentiation, that may include spindle cell, chondroid, osseous, or rhabdomyoid differentiation patterns. The implications of MBC recurrence and survival outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: Cases were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database of patients treated from 1998 to 2015. Patients with MBC were matched 1:1 to non-MBC cases. Cox proportional-hazards models and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate outcome differences between cohorts. RESULTS: 111 patients with MBC were matched 1:1 with non-MBC patients from an initial set of 2400 patients. Median follow-up time was 8 years. Most patients with MBC received chemotherapy (88%) and radiotherapy (71%). On univariate competing risk regression, MBC was not associated with locoregional recurrence (HR = 1.08; p = 0.8), distant recurrence (HR = 1.65; p = 0.092); disease-free survival (HR = 1.52; p = 0.065), or overall survival (HR = 1.56; p = 0.1). Absolute differences were noted in 8-year disease-free survival (49.6% MBC vs 66.4% non-MBC) and overall survival (61.3% MBC vs 74.4% non-MBC), though neither of these reached statistical significance (p = 0.07 and 0.11, respectively). CONCLUSION: Appropriately-treated MBC may exhibit recurrence and survival outcomes that are difficult to distinguish from those of non-MBC. While prior studies suggest that MBC has a worse natural history than non-MBC triple-negative breast cancer, prudent use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may narrow these differences, although studies with more power will be required to inform clinical management. Longer follow-up among larger populations may further elucidate the clinical and therapeutic implications of MBC.

Early Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Purpose: The management of patients with advanced solid malignancies increasingly uses stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Advanced cancer patients are at risk for developing leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely collected during computed tomography (CT) myelography for spinal SBRT planning, offering an opportunity for early LM detection by CSF cytology in the absence of radiographic LM or LM symptoms (subclinical LM). This study tested the hypothesis that early detection of tumor cells in CSF in patients undergoing spine SBRT portends a similarly poor prognosis compared with clinically overt LM. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed clinical records for 495 patients with metastatic solid tumors who underwent CT myelography for spinal SBRT planning at a single institution from 2014 to 2019. Results: Among patients planned for SBRT, 51 (10.3%) developed LM. Eight patients (1.6%) had subclinical LM. Median survival with LM was similar between patients with subclinical versus clinically evident LM (3.6 vs 3.0 months, P = .30). Patients harboring both parenchymal brain metastases and LM (29/51) demonstrated shorter survival than those with LM alone (2.4 vs 7.1 months, P = .02). Conclusions: LM remains a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Subclinical LM detected by CSF cytology in spine SBRT patients has a similarly poor prognosis compared with standardly detected LM and warrants consideration of central nervous system-directed therapies. As aggressive local therapies are increasingly used for metastatic patients, more sensitive CSF evaluation may further identify patients with subclinical LM and should be evaluated prospectively.

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process.

Purpose: Local treatment for bone metastases is becoming increasingly complex. National guidelines traditionally focus only on radiation therapy (RT), leaving a gap in clinical decision support resources available to clinicians. The objective of this study was to reach expert consensus regarding multidisciplinary management of non-spine bone metastases, which would facilitate standardizing treatment within an academic-community partnership. Methods and Materials: A multidisciplinary panel of physicians treating metastatic disease across the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Alliance, including community-based partner sites, was convened. Clinical questions rated of high importance in the management of non-spine bone metastases were identified via survey. A literature review was conducted, and panel physicians drafted initial recommendation statements. Consensus was gathered on recommendation statements through a modified Delphi process from a full panel of 17 physicians from radiation oncology, orthopaedic surgery, medical oncology, interventional radiology, and anesthesia pain. Consensus was defined a priori as 75% of respondents indicating "agree" or "strongly agree" with the consensus statement. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy was employed to assign evidence strength for each statement. Results: Seventeen clinical questions were identified, of which 11 (65%) were selected for the consensus process. Consensus was reached for 16 of 17 answer statements (94%), of which 12 were approved after Round 1 and additional 4 approved after Round 2 of the modified Delphi voting process. Topics included indications for referral to surgery or interventional radiology, radiation fractionation and appropriate use of stereotactic approaches, and the handling of systemic therapies during radiation. Evidence strength was most commonly C (n = 7), followed by B (n = 5) and A (n = 3). Conclusions: Consensus among a multidisciplinary panel of community and academic physicians treating non-spine bone metastases was feasible. Recommendations will assist clinicians and potentially provide measures to reduce variation across diverse practice settings. Findings highlight areas for further research such as pathologic fracture risk estimation, pre-operative radiation, and percutaneous ablation.