Radiochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: early results.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Recent results of the prospective randomized trials have shown an overall survival and local control advantage for cisplatin-based therapy given concurrently with radiation therapy. Thirty-nine patients who received concurrent chemoradiation between October 1999 and December 2000 were evaluated for treatment response, local control and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with Stage IB through IVA cervical carcinoma received weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) concurrent with radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received both external and intracavitary radiotherapy and seven patients received only external radiotherapy because of insufficient tumor response for intracavitary application. Total external radiotherapy dose was 64.8 Gy with 1.8 Gy daily fractions in patients who received only external radiotherapy. Midline shielding was performed at 50.4 Gy in patients who were going to receive brachytherapy and the total external radiotherapy dose was 54-59.4 Gy. Brachytherapy was performed with a Rotterdam applicator via the microSelectron HDR machine. A total dose of 8.5-18 Gy was applied to point A. RESULTS: Median age was 55. Distribution by stages were as follows: Stage IB 5.1%, IIA 28.2%, IIB 43.6%, IIIA 7.7%, IIIB 12.8% and IVA 2.6%. Histologically 33 (84.6%) were epidermoid carcinoma, one was adenocarcinoma, two were undifferentiated carcinoma, one was malignant epithelial tumor. In two patients histological type could not be specified. The median duration of follow-up was 20 months. Four patients had local recurrence and three developed distant metastases. Thirty patients (76.9%) had complete response, eight had (20.5%) partial response and one had (2.6%) stable disease. During or after radiochemotherapy 46.2% of the patients developed toxicity due to chemotherapy. Early and late radiation morbidity rates were 66.7% and 71.8%, respectively. No grade III-IV toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer is the treatment of choice in suitable patients providing high response rates with acceptable toxicity.

Evaluation of morbidity after external radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy in 771 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix or endometrium.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate early and late radiation morbidity and to assess the factors influencing morbidity in patients with cervical or endometrial cancer treated by a combination of external radiotherapy (ERT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (IBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Early and late radiation morbidity were evaluated retrospectively using RTOG/EORTC criteria and Franco-Italian glossary in 771 patients treated between November 1992 and December 1999. RESULTS: Four hundred and seven patients (52.8%) had endometrial carcinoma and 364 (47.2%) had carcinoma of the cervix. One hundred and fifty-four patients with cervical carcinoma were inoperable. In patients with endometrial carcinoma total doses at the vagina, bladder and rectum were 60.36 Gy, 56.2 Gy and 55.6 Gy respectively. Biologically equivalent doses (BED) for the same points were 79.35, 68.63 and 67.37, respectively for early effects and 123.67, 97.65 and 94.85, respectively for late effects. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (41.5%) developed acute morbidity, grade I and II bladder morbidity being the most common type and 85 patients (20.9%) developed late morbidity, grade I and II vaginal morbidity being the most common type. No grade IV morbidity was recorded. Total doses at the vagina, bladder and rectum in operated cervix cancer patients were 60.51 Gy, 56.53 Gy and 55.67 Gy, respectively. BED for the same points were 79.77, 69.36 and 67.52, respectively for early effects and 124.74, 99.3 and 95.17, respectively for late effects. Eighty patients (38.1%) developed early morbidity. Grade I and II bladder morbidity was the most common type. Sixty-five patients (30.9%) developed late morbidity, vaginal morbidity being the most common type. Total doses at the vagina, bladder and rectum in inoperable patients were 70.92 Gy, 66.71 Gy and 62.38 Gy, respectively. BED for the same points were 97.43, 89.64 and 81.63, respectively for early effects and 159.3, 143.16 and 126.56, respectively for late effects. Sixty patients (39%) developed acute morbidity which was grade I or II bladder morbidity in 95%. Ninety-five patients (61.7%) developed late morbidity which was grade I-III vaginal morbidity in 94%. CONCLUSION: Patients with cervical or endometrial cancer can be treated safely by a combination of ERT and IBRT. However the patients should be assessed before, during and after treatment and at every period of follow-up using a standard and well-defined system in order to define and predict the morbidity rate.

The impact of the haemoglobin level on the response to radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To define the impact of preradiotherapy haemoglobin (Hb) levels on the response rate of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck, uterine cervix and lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients- 38 with head and neck cancer, 43 with carcinona of the uterine cervix and 32 with lung cancer- were retrospectively evaluated to determine the correlation between tumor response and preradiotherapy Hb levels. Hb level of 11 g/dl was taken as cut-off value for anemia. Patients were divided in two groups according to their objective response to radiotherapy. RESULTS: Histologically 30 of the head and neck cancers, 36 of the cervical cancers and 17 of the lung cancers were squamous-cell carcinomas. Tumor response of the epidermoid carcinomas were significantly correlated with preradiotherapy Hb levels (p < 0.001). Tumor response in patients with head and neck and cervical cancers was significantly correlated with pretreatment Hb levels while in patients with lung cancer this correlation did not reach statistical significance (p=0.059). CONCLUSION: Preradiotherapy Hb level is an important factor in determining the efficacy of radiotherapy. Raising the Hb level before radiotherapy may have a beneficial impact on the response to radiotherapy.