RESUMEN
Rupture of an aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta into the right pleural cavity is an uncommon event and its prognosis is rapidly fatal. Its diagnosis is difficult and it may remain unrecognized. We report the case of a 66-year-old patient with a haemorrhagic shock associated with a spontaneous right haemothorax. A ruptured aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta was diagnosed during the surgical procedure.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Cavidad Pleural , Anciano , Hemotórax/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Respiración Artificial , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to quantify the additional postoperative analgesic efficacy of a single dose of ketoprofen in patients undergoing thyroid surgery using two different intraoperative analgesic regimens. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: intraoperative fentanyl or remifentanil with or without ketoprofen (n = 30 for each group). Intravenous ketoprofen (1.5 mg kg-1) or saline was administered 45 min before the end of surgery. Pain scores, opioid demand and length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit were assessed in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Patients receiving intraoperative fentanyl with saline had significantly lower visual analogue scale pain scores in the postanaesthesia care unit compared with those receiving intraoperative remifentanil with saline (55 +/- 10 mm vs. 80 +/- 18 mm, P < 0.05) and they stayed shorter in the postanaesthesia care unit (86 +/- 24 min vs. 126 +/- 37 min). In conjunction with intraoperative fentanyl, ketoprofen significantly decreased postoperative pain scores (40 +/- 10 mm, P < 0.05 compared with fentanyl alone) and opioid demand (4 of 30 patients vs. 14 of 30 patients compared with fentanyl alone, P < 0.05). Patients receiving intraoperative remifentanil had no additional analgesic benefit with ketoprofen. CONCLUSION: After thyroid surgery, patients receiving intraoperative fentanyl had lower pain scores and needed less rescue analgesia compared with patients receiving intraoperative remifentanil. The adjunction of ketoprofen further improved analgesia in patients who received intraoperative fentanyl only.
Asunto(s)
Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Cetoprofeno/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Glándula Tiroides/cirugía , Adulto , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Remifentanilo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the effect on postoperative pain, opioid consumption and the length of stay in postoperative care unit (PACU) after three different intraoperative analgesic regimens in thyroid surgery. METHODS: Seventy five patients were enrolled into the study and assigned to one of three groups, fentanyl, sufentanil or remifentanil (n=25 for each group). Before the end of surgery, paracetamol 1 gr and nefopam 20 mg was also administered in all patients. Pain scores, opioid demand and the length of stay in PACU were assessed in a blind manner. RESULTS: Post operative pain scores were significantly lower in the fentanyl and sufentanil groups compared to remifentanil group (55 +/- 15, and 60 +/- 10 versus 78+/- 12, P < 0.05). Patients in the remifentanil group stayed longer in the PACU 108+/- 37 min versus 78+/-31 and 73 +/- 25 min, (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: After remifentanil based analgesia, anticipation of postoperative pain with opioid analgesic appears mandatory even for surgery rated as being moderately painful, otherwise longer opioid titration due to higher pain scores might delay discharge time.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The primary goal of this study was to investigate the relation between the core temperature of critically ill patients and hot ambient temperatures during a heat wave. The second goal was to evaluate the impact of such a heat wave on the number of microbiological tests ordered. METHODS: During a heat wave, from August 3 to 22, 2003, we conducted an observational study in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a French hospital that had no air-conditioning at the time. The core temperature of 18 critically ill patients and 36 health-care workers was measured with a non-contact, infrared tympanic membrane thermometer. The association between the core body temperature in infected and non-infected critically ill patients and the staff members, and the ambient temperature in the ICU was analysed using linear regression. The number of microbiological tests ordered was also recorded and compared with the same period in the previous year. RESULTS: The equation of the regression line for infected critically ill patients was: core temperature=33.5+0.16 x ambient temperature (R(2)=0.53; P<0.0001). The regression line was steeper than that for the non-infected patients (0.077; P<0.0001). The slopes of the regression lines for non-infected and control patients were similar (P=0.20). More blood cultures were carried out during the heat wave than at the same period during the year 2002 (4.80 blood cultures per 1000 patient-days vs 2.47 per 1000 patient-days; P=0.0006). CONCLUSION: During a sustained high ambient temperature, hyperthermia can occur in critically ill infected patients and to a lesser extent in non-infected patients and health-care workers. The number of blood cultures requested rises substantially, leading to increased costs. Installation of air-conditioning is therefore recommended.