Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the usefulness of the breast electrical conductivity measures performed in a surgical examination room against conventional breast screening modalities for identifying the symptomatic lesions of the breast tissue. METHODS: A group of 181 patients were examined with Ultrasonography (USG), Mammography (MG), Electrical Impedance Scanning (EIS) modalities and were followed-up 24 months to clarify in terms of the lesion tumour progression relationship. Tumour biopsy was determined as an endpoint of the study. RESULTS: According to USG, 13 (7.2 %) lesion were suspicious, where as EIS was reported 22 (12.2 %). 2 of these 9 patients were presented as BI-RADS 4 and histopathologic result was proven as malignant disease during 6 months short-interval follow-up. EIS exhibited compatible sensitivity (81.2 %), accuracy (84.6 %) and PPV (81.8 %) rates with USG in BI-RADS 4 subgroup, combination of these modalities raised sensitivity rates to 92.31 %, accuracy and PPV to 100 %. EIS results in BI-RADS 3 subgroup were pointed out 77.8 % specificity and 87.5 % NPV rates. CONCLUSION: Breast electrical impedance measures should be useful to reduce the number of the unnecessary follow-up and biopsy rates in the clinical setting (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 39).

Ultrasound elastographic evaluation of the median nerve in pregnant women with carpal tunnel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the median nerve (MN) in pregnant women with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by using ultrasound elastography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 wrists of 20 pregnant women with CTS and 25 wrists of 14 healthy control pregnant women were evaluated by ultrasound and ultrasound elastography (UE). The MN in the patients' wrist was imaged to measure the cross-sectional area and longitudinally to calculate the elasticity value (EV) at four different locations (proximal carpal tunnel (CT) at the level of the pisiform, distal CT at the level of the hamate, middle of the CT and forearm at one centimeter above the CT). Clinical classification was performed according to a historic and objective scale of CTS. In the healthy pregnant women and pregnant women with CTS, MN area and EV were analyzed statistically by comparing with parity and clinical grade. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference for MN area between the patient and control groups (p = 0.001). A positive relationship was found between parity in pregnancy and clinical grade of the CTS (p = 0.035, Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.386). Although MN elasticity for both groups was nearly the same in the proximal region of the CT, these values were decreased in the middle of the CT. MN elasticity values were smaller in the distal region of CT, and it was statistically significant in pregnant women with CTS (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound elastography, which is a non-invasive, inexpensive and a favorable diagnosis technique, may be useful in the diagnosis of CTS, especially in conditions in which an invasive procedure would be problem, as in pregnancy.