RESUMEN
Background and study aims The usefulness of endoscopy for diagnosing histological type remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic accuracy of white light endoscopy (WLE), magnified endoscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI-ME), and NBI-ME with acetic acid enhancement (NBI-AA) for histological type of gastric cancer. Patients and methods Patients with depressed-type gastric cancers resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection were prospectively enrolled, and 221 cases were analyzed. Histological type was diagnosed by WLE, followed by NBI-ME and NBI-AA. Histological type was classified into differentiated adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated adenocarcinoma. Histological type was diagnosed based on lesion color in WLE, surface patterns (pit, villi, and unclear) and vascular irregularities in NBI-ME, and surface patterns in NBI-AA. Results Histological types of target areas were differentiated adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated adenocarcinoma in 206 and 15 cases, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of WLE, NBI-ME, and NBI-AA for the histological type was 96.4â% (213/221), 96.8â% (214/221), and 95.5â% (211/221), respectively. No significant differences were observed among modalities. Positive predictive value based on endoscopic findings in NBI-ME was 98.0â% (149/152) for the villi pattern, 100â% (19/19) for the irregular pit pattern, 100â% (9/9) for the unclear surface pattern with a vascular network, 90.3â% (28/31) for the unclear surface pattern with mild vascular irregularity, and 88.9â% (8/9) for the unclear surface pattern with severe vascular irregularity. Conclusions NBI-ME and NBI-AA did not show any advantages over WLE for diagnostic accuracy. Villi pattern, irregular pit pattern, and vascular network may be useful for identifying differentiated adenocarcinoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to determine risk factors associated with serious complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors in multicenters compared between high- and low-volume centers. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2010, gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed in 1190 lesions of 1082 patients in five hospitals in Saga, three high-volume and two low-volume centers. Risk factors for serious complications were evaluated. Patients' background characteristics were evaluated, including anticoagulants use and underlying diseases. RESULTS: Postoperative bleeding was detected in 75 patients (6.9%), and perforation was detected in 40 patients (3.7%). Most postoperative bleeding and perforation cases were recovered with endoscopic procedures, although one case of each complication was treated by emergency surgery. Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for perforation were tumor location, massive submucusal invasion, endoscopists' experience of 100-149 cases and hypertension, and that risk factors for postoperative bleeding were tumor location, resected tumor size, and scar lesion. The serious complications were not different between high- and low-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection were tumor, endoscopist and patient related, although risk factors for postoperative bleeding were tumor related. There was no difference in complications between high- and low-volume centers.
Asunto(s)
Disección/efectos adversos , Mucosa Gástrica/cirugía , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Estómago/lesiones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disección/métodos , Femenino , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Early detection of gastric cancer by screening endoscopy facilitates endoscopic treatment in place of open surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether 2 years intensive training improved the detection of gastric cancer by screening endoscopy. METHODS: An endoscopist who had trained for 6 years as a general physician, performed screening endoscopy at Imari Arita Kyoritsu Hospital before (group I) and after (group II) intensive training in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer in consecutive patients. RESULTS: Background characteristics, including age (61.6 vs. 62.2 years) and sex, did not differ between the groups. Before training, 10 gastric neoplasms were detected in 937 patients in group I: four early gastric cancers, one gastric adenoma, and five advanced gastric cancer. After training, 36 gastric neoplasms were detected in 937 patients in group II: 18 early gastric cancers, 11 gastric adenoma, five advanced gastric cancer, and one each of gastric carcinoid and malignant lymphoma. The detection rate for early gastric cancer was significantly improved by training [group I: 4/937 (0.4%) vs. group II: 18/937 (1.9%)], although the detection rate for advanced gastric cancer did not differ before and after training. The proportion of early gastric cancer + adenoma to advanced cancer was higher in group II (5/5 vs. 29/5 in group I). CONCLUSION: Intensive training in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening dramatically improved the detection rate for early gastric cancer, although the detection rate for advanced gastric cancer was not affected.
Asunto(s)
Gastroscopía/educación , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Anciano , Tumor Carcinoide/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Early detection and early treatment are of vital importance to the successful treatment of various cancers. The development of a novel screening method that is as economical and non-invasive as the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is needed. A study was undertaken using canine scent detection to determine whether odour material can become an effective tool in CRC screening. DESIGN: Exhaled breath and watery stool samples were obtained from patients with CRC and from healthy controls prior to colonoscopy. Each test group consisted of one sample from a patient with CRC and four control samples from volunteers without cancer. These five samples were randomly and separately placed into five boxes. A Labrador retriever specially trained in scent detection of cancer and a handler cooperated in the tests. The dog first smelled a standard breath sample from a patient with CRC, then smelled each sample station and sat down in front of the station in which a cancer scent was detected. RESULTS: 33 and 37 groups of breath and watery stool samples, respectively, were tested. Among patients with CRC and controls, the sensitivity of canine scent detection of breath samples compared with conventional diagnosis by colonoscopy was 0.91 and the specificity was 0.99. The sensitivity of canine scent detection of stool samples was 0.97 and the specificity was 0.99. The accuracy of canine scent detection was high even for early cancer. Canine scent detection was not confounded by current smoking, benign colorectal disease or inflammatory disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a specific cancer scent does indeed exist and that cancer-specific chemical compounds may be circulating throughout the body. These odour materials may become effective tools in CRC screening. In the future, studies designed to identify cancer-specific volatile organic compounds will be important for the development of new methods for early detection of CRC.