The identification of risk factors for venous thromboembolism in gastrointestinal oncologic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and factors associated with occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery for malignancy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Participant User File database was queried from 2005 to 2012 to study major GI operations performed for cancer. Predictors of VTE and their relation to survival were studied. RESULTS: In 79,300 patients, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 1.7%, and pulmonary embolism was 0.9% during the 30-d postoperative period. The highest rate of VTE occurred after esophagectomy (5.9%) followed by pancreatectomy (3.2%), hepatectomy (3.2%), gastrectomy (2.5%), enterectomy (2.3%), colectomy, and proctectomy (2.0%). On multivariate analysis, disseminated cancer, age ≥ 80 y, body mass index > 35 kg/m(2), functional status, post operative sepsis, pulmonary dysfunction, and longer operative time were associated with occurrence of VTE. Occurrence of VTE was associated with mortality on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 2.0-3.0, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Absolute incidence of VTE after major GI surgery is low but is associated with significant mortality and postoperative complications. Disseminated cancer, post operative sepsis, longer operative time, and increased body mass index >35 kg/m(2) further increased the risk of VTE in patients undergoing surgery for malignancy. Surveillance strategies should be implemented for those cancer patients who have multiple risk factors for VTE.

Pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major abdominal surgery are common and associated with significant morbidity and high cost of care. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for PPCs after major abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005-2012 was queried for patients who underwent major abdominal surgery (esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pacnreatectomy, enterectomy, hepatectomy, colectomy, and proctectomy). Predictors of PPCs were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 165,196 patients who underwent major abdominal surgery 9595 (5.8%) suffered PPCs (pneumonia 3.2%, prolonged ventilator support ≥48 h 3.0%, and unplanned intubation 2.8%). On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of overall and individual PPCs include esophagectomy, advanced American Society of Anesthesiology Classification System, dependent functional status, prolonged operative time, age ≥80 y, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative shock, ascites, and smoking. Obesity was not a risk factor. Female gender was overall protective for PPCs. CONCLUSIONS: PPCs after abdominal procedures are associated with a number of clinical variables. Esophageal operations and American Society of Anesthesiology Classification System were the strongest predictors. These results provide a framework for identifying patients at risk for developing pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery.

The evidence for nonoperative management of visceral artery dissections: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection is an uncommon condition encountered by clinicians. Presentation may vary from asymptomatic to acute intestinal ischemia, although a clear natural history has yet to be elucidated. No consensus exists on how best to manage these patients in the absence of true intestinal ischemia; however, much of the literature suggests that intervention is required. We present our institution's experience with 10 patients, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, all but 1 of whom was managed medically. METHODS: From September 2009 to August 2013, 10 patients presented to our institution with celiac or mesenteric artery dissection. We retrospectively reviewed these patients' clinical presentation, treatment, and follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61.5 ± 10.3 (standard deviation [SD]) years (range, 41-77 years), and the mean follow-up period was 14.7 ± 11.6 (SD) months (range, 1-31 months). Four (40%) patients had abdominal pain and no ischemic changes of the bowel. There were 1 type I, 6 type II, 2 type III, and 1 type IV dissections according to Sakamoto classification. Treatments included observation without anticoagulation treatment in 8 patients (80%), anticoagulation treatment in 1 patient (10%), and endovascular stenting in 1 patient (10%) with unremitting abdominal pain. Anticoagulation was used in the 1 symptomatic patient with radiographic evidence of associated thrombus. The disease stabilized in all patients during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Most authors tend to advocate an endovascular or even operative repair for these processes. In our experience, most of these patients have a self-limited course of symptoms or their dissections are found incidentally. We believe that the results of conservative management in our cohort of patients support the conservative approach over the once recommended operative repair.