RESUMEN
RNA modifications play a crucial role in cancer development, profoundly influencing various stages of the RNA lifecycle. These stages encompass nuclear processing, nuclear export, splicing, and translation in the cytoplasm. Among RNA modifications, RNA ac4C modification, also known as N4-acetylcytidine, stands out for its unique role in acetylation processes. Specific proteins regulate RNA ac4C modification, maintaining the dynamic and reversible nature of these changes. This review explores the molecular mechanisms and biological functions of RNA ac4C modification. It examines the intricate ways in which RNA ac4C modification influences the pathogenesis and progression of cancer. Additionally, the review provides an integrated overview of the current methodologies for detecting RNA ac4C modification. Exploring the potential applications of manipulating this modification suggests avenues for novel therapeutic strategies, potentially leading to more effective cancer treatments in the future.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the predominant form of thyroid cancer globally, especially when lymph node metastasis (LNM) occurs. Molecular heterogeneity, driven by genetic alterations and tumor microenvironment components, contributes to the complexity of PTC. Understanding these complexities is essential for precise risk stratification and therapeutic decisions. METHODS: This study involved a comprehensive analysis of 521 patients with PTC from our hospital and 499 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The real-world cohort 1 comprised 256 patients with stage I-III PTC. Tissues from 252 patients were analyzed by DNA-based next-generation sequencing, and tissues from four patients were analyzed by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Additionally, 586 PTC pathological sections were collected from TCGA, and 275 PTC pathological sections were collected from the real-world cohort 2. A deep learning multimodal model was developed using matched histopathology images, genomic, transcriptomic, and immune cell data to predict LNM and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: This study included a total of 1,011 PTC patients, comprising 256 patients from cohort 1, 275 patients from cohort 2, and 499 patients from TCGA. In cohort 1, we categorized PTC into four molecular subtypes based on BRAF, RAS, RET, and other mutations. BRAF mutations were significantly associated with LNM and impacted DFS. ScRNA-seq identified distinct T cell subtypes and reduced B cell diversity in BRAF-mutated PTC with LNM. The study also explored cancer-associated fibroblasts and macrophages, highlighting their associations with LNM. The deep learning model was trained using 405 pathology slides and RNA sequences from 328 PTC patients and validated with 181 slides and RNA sequences from 140 PTC patients in the TCGA cohort. It achieved high accuracy, with an AUC of 0.86 in the training cohort, 0.84 in the validation cohort, and 0.83 in the real-world cohort 2. High-risk patients in the training cohort had significantly lower DFS rates (P<0.001). Model AUCs were 0.91 at 1 year, 0.93 at 3 years, and 0.87 at 5 years. In the validation cohort, high-risk patients also had lower DFS (P<0.001); the AUCs were 0.89, 0.87, and 0.80 at 1, 3, and 5 years. We utilized the GradCAM algorithm to generate heatmaps from pathology-based deep learning models, which visually highlighted high-risk tumor areas in PTC patients. This enhanced clinicians' understanding of the model's predictions and improved diagnostic accuracy, especially in cases with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: The AI-based analysis uncovered vital insights into PTC molecular heterogeneity, emphasizing BRAF mutations' impact. The integrated deep learning model shows promise in predicting metastasis, offering valuable contributions to improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
RESUMEN
Background: The prognosis of breast cancer is often unfavorable, emphasizing the need for early metastasis risk detection and accurate treatment predictions. This study aimed to develop a novel multi-modal deep learning model using preoperative data to predict disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We retrospectively collected pathology imaging, molecular and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and one independent institution in China. We developed a novel Deep Learning Clinical Medicine Based Pathological Gene Multi-modal (DeepClinMed-PGM) model for DFS prediction, integrating clinicopathological data with molecular insights. The patients included the training cohort (n = 741), internal validation cohort (n = 184), and external testing cohort (n = 95). Result: Integrating multi-modal data into the DeepClinMed-PGM model significantly improved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values. In the training cohort, AUC values for 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS predictions increased to 0.979, 0.957, and 0.871, while in the external testing cohort, the values reached 0.851, 0.878, and 0.938 for 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS predictions, respectively. The DeepClinMed-PGM's robust discriminative capabilities were consistently evident across various cohorts, including the training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.027, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0016-0.046, P < 0.0001], the internal validation cohort (HR 0.117, 95% CI 0.041-0.334, P < 0.0001), and the external cohort (HR 0.061, 95% CI 0.017-0.218, P < 0.0001). Additionally, the DeepClinMed-PGM model demonstrated C-index values of 0.925, 0.823, and 0.864 within the three cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: This study introduces an approach to breast cancer prognosis, integrating imaging and molecular and clinical data for enhanced predictive accuracy, offering promise for personalized treatment strategies.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: SHR-A1811 is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody trastuzumab, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. We assessed the safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of SHR-A1811 in heavily pretreated HER2-expressing or mutated advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This global, multi-center, first-in-human, phase I trial was conducted at 33 centers. Patients who had HER2-expressing or mutated unresectable, advanced, or metastatic solid tumors and were refractory or intolerant to standard therapies were enrolled. SHR-A1811 was administered intravenously at doses ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity, safety, and the recommended phase II dose. RESULTS: From September 7, 2020, to February 27, 2023, 307 patients who had undergone a median of three (IQR, 2-5) previous treatment regimens in the metastatic setting received SHR-A1811 treatment. As of data cutoff (February 28, 2023), one patient from the 6.4 mg/kg group experienced dose-limiting toxicities (pancytopenia and colitis). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) included decreased neutrophil count (119 [38.8%]) and decreased WBC count (70 [22.8%]). Interstitial lung disease occurred in only eight (2.6%) patients. Serious AEs and deaths occurred in 70 (22.8%) and 13 (4.2%) patients, respectively. SHR-A1811 led to objective responses in 59.9% (184/307) of all patients, 76.3% (90/118) of HER2-positive breast cancer, 60.4% (55/91) of HER2 low-expressing breast cancer, and 45.9% (39/85 with evaluable tumor responses) of the 98 nonbreast tumors. CONCLUSION: SHR-A1811 exhibited acceptable tolerability, promising antitumor activity, and a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose of 4.8 or 6.4 mg/kg was selected for various tumor types.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial. SETTING: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up. CONCLUSION: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Capecitabina , Cisplatino , Desoxicitidina , Gemcitabina , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidad , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Progresión , China , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
Cervical cancer is a significant global health issue, its prevalence and prognosis highlighting the importance of early screening for effective prevention. This research aimed to create and validate an artificial intelligence cervical cancer screening (AICCS) system for grading cervical cytology. The AICCS system was trained and validated using various datasets, including retrospective, prospective, and randomized observational trial data, involving a total of 16,056 participants. It utilized two artificial intelligence (AI) models: one for detecting cells at the patch-level and another for classifying whole-slide image (WSIs). The AICCS consistently showed high accuracy in predicting cytology grades across different datasets. In the prospective assessment, it achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.947, a sensitivity of 0.946, a specificity of 0.890, and an accuracy of 0.892. Remarkably, the randomized observational trial revealed that the AICCS-assisted cytopathologists had a significantly higher AUC, specificity, and accuracy than cytopathologists alone, with a notable 13.3% enhancement in sensitivity. Thus, AICCS holds promise as an additional tool for accurate and efficient cervical cancer screening.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Área Bajo la Curva , Cuello del Útero/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stomach cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally due to its high grade and poor response to treatment. Understanding the molecular network driving the rapid progression of stomach cancer is crucial for improving patient outcomes. METHODS: This study aimed to investigate the role of unfolded protein response (UPR) related genes in stomach cancer and their potential as prognostic biomarkers. RNA expression data and clinical follow-up information were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases. An unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to identify UPR genomic subtypes in stomach cancer. Functional enrichment analysis, immune landscape analysis, and chemotherapy benefit prediction were conducted for each subtype. A prognostic model based on UPR-related genes was developed and validated using LASSO-Cox regression, and a multivariate nomogram was created. Key gene expression analyses in pan-cancer and in vitro experiments were performed to further investigate the role of the identified genes in cancer progression. RESULTS: A total of 375 stomach cancer patients were included in this study. Analysis of 113 UPR-related genes revealed their close functional correlation and significant enrichment in protein modification, transport, and RNA degradation pathways. Unsupervised clustering identified two molecular subtypes with significant differences in prognosis and gene expression profiles. Immune landscape analysis showed that UPR may influence the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment. Chemotherapy sensitivity analysis indicated that patients in the C2 molecular subtype were more responsive to chemotherapy compared to those in the C1 molecular subtype. A prognostic signature consisting of seven UPR-related genes was constructed and validated, and an independent prognostic nomogram was developed. The gene IGFBP1, which had the highest weight coefficient in the prognostic signature, was found to promote the malignant phenotype of stomach cancer cells, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target. CONCLUSIONS: The study developed a UPR-related gene classifier and risk signature for predicting survival in stomach cancer, identifying IGFBP1 as a key factor promoting the disease's malignancy and a potential therapeutic target. IGFBP1's role in enhancing cancer cell adaptation to endoplasmic reticulum stress suggests its importance in stomach cancer prognosis and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias Gástricas , Microambiente Tumoral , Respuesta de Proteína Desplegada , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Humanos , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Respuesta de Proteína Desplegada/genética , Respuesta de Proteína Desplegada/inmunología , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Femenino , Masculino , Nomogramas , Transcriptoma , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Background: In breast cancer oncogenesis, the precise role of cell apoptosis holds untapped potential for prognostic and therapeutic insights. Thus, it is important to develop a model predicated for breast cancer patients' prognosis and immunotherapy response based on apoptosis-related signature. Methods: Our approach involved leveraging a training dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to construct an apoptosis-related gene prognostic model. The model's validity was then tested across several cohorts, including METABRIC, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat-sen University (SYSMH), and IMvigor210, to ensure its applicability and robustness across different patient demographics and treatment scenarios. Furthermore, we utilized Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) analysis to explore the expression patterns of these model genes in breast cancer cell lines compared to immortalized mammary epithelial cell lines, aiming to confirm their differential expression and underline their significance in the context of breast cancer. Results: Through the development and validation of our prognostic model based on seven apoptosis-related genes, we have demonstrated its substantial predictive power for the survival outcomes of breast cancer patients. The model effectively stratified patients into high and low-risk categories, with high-risk patients showing significantly poorer overall survival in the training cohort and across all validation cohorts. Importantly, qPCR analysis confirmed that the genes constituting our model indeed exhibit differential expression in breast cancer cell lines when contrasted with immortalized mammary epithelial cell lines. Conclusion: Our study establishes a groundbreaking prognostic model using apoptosis-related genes to enhance the precision of breast cancer prognosis and treatment, particularly in predicting immunotherapy response.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The impact of distinct estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression patterns on tumor behavior and treatment outcomes within HER2-positive breast cancer is not fully explored. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the clinical differences among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer harboring distinct ER and PR expression patterns in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 871 HER2-positive breast patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy at our hospital between 2011 and 2022. Comparisons were performed across the three hormone receptor (HR)-specific subtypes, namely the ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-positive (ER-/PR-/HER2+), the single HR-positive (HR+)/HER2+, and the triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) subtypes. RESULTS: Of 871 patients, 21.0% had ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors, 33.6% had single HR+/HER2+ disease, and 45.4% had TPBC. Individuals with single HR+/HER2+ tumors and TPBC cases demonstrated significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared to those with ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors (36.9% vs. 24.3% vs. 49.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed TPBC as significantly associated with decreased pCR likelihood (OR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.28-0.63, p < 0.001). Survival outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), showed no significant differences across HR-specific subtypes in the overall patient population. However, within patients without anti-HER2 therapy, TPBC was linked to improved DFS and a trend towards better OS. CONCLUSIONS: HER2-positive breast cancer exhibited three distinct HR-specific subtypes with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. These findings suggest personalized treatment strategies considering ER and PR expression patterns, emphasizing the need for further investigations to unravel molecular traits underlying HER2-positive breast cancer with distinct HR expression patterns.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores de Progesterona , Humanos , Femenino , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
The exact function of M1 macrophages and CXCL9 in forecasting the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still not thoroughly investigated. We investigated the potential of M1 macrophage and C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 9 (CXCL9) as predictive markers for ICI efficacy, employing a comprehensive approach integrating multicohort analysis and single-cell RNA sequencing. A significant correlation between high M1 macrophage and improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) was found. M1 macrophage expression was most pronounced in the immune-inflamed phenotype, aligning with increased expression of immune checkpoints. Furthermore, CXCL9 was identified as a key marker gene that positively correlated with M1 macrophage and response to ICIs, while also exhibiting associations with immune-related pathways and immune cell infiltration. Additionally, through exploring RNA epigenetic modifications, we identified Apolipoprotein B MRNA Editing Enzyme Catalytic Subunit 3G (APOBEC3G) as linked to ICI response, with high expression correlating with improved OS and immune-related pathways. Moreover, a novel model based on M1 macrophage, CXCL9, and APOBEC3G-related genes was developed using multi-level attention graph neural network, which showed promising predictive ability for ORR. This study illuminates the pivotal contributions of M1 macrophages and CXCL9 in shaping an immune-active microenvironment, correlating with enhanced ICI efficacy. The combination of M1 macrophage, CXCL9, and APOBEC3G provides a novel model for predicting clinical outcomes of ICI therapy, facilitating personalized immunotherapy.
RESUMEN
The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly advanced cancer treatment. However, their efficacy is not consistent across all patients, underscoring the need for personalized approaches. In this study, we examined the relationship between activated CD4+ memory T cell expression and ICI responsiveness. A notable correlation was observed between increased activated CD4+ memory T cell expression and better patient survival in various cohorts. Additionally, the chemokine CXCL13 was identified as a potential prognostic biomarker, with higher expression levels associated with improved outcomes. Further analysis highlighted CXCL13's role in influencing the Tumor Microenvironment, emphasizing its relevance in tumor immunity. Using these findings, we developed a deep learning model by the Multi-Layer Aggregation Graph Neural Network method. This model exhibited promise in predicting ICI treatment efficacy, suggesting its potential application in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
Importance: The bioequivalence of denosumab biosimilar has yet to be studied in a 53-week, multicenter, large-scale, and head-to-head trial. A clinically effective biosimilar may help increase access to denosumab in patients with solid tumor-related bone metastases. Objectives: To establish the biosimilarity of MW032 to denosumab in patients with solid tumor-related bone metastases based on a large-scale head-to-head study. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this 53-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 equivalence trial, patients with solid tumors with bone metastasis were recruited from 46 clinical sites in China. Overall, 856 patients were screened and 708 eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive either MW032 or denosumab. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive MW032 or reference denosumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks until week 49. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percentage change from baseline to week 13 of natural logarithmic transformed urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio (uNTx/uCr). Results: Among the 701 evaluable patients (350 in the MW032 group and 351 in the denosumab group), the mean (range) age was 56.1 (22.0-86.0) years and 460 patients were women (65.6%). The mean change of uNTx/uCr from baseline to week 13 was -72.0% (95% CI, -73.5% to -70.4%) in the MW032 group and -72.7% (95% CI, -74.2% to -71.2%) in the denosumab group. These percent changes corresponded to mean logarithmic ratios of -1.27 and -1.30, or a difference of 0.02. The 90% CI for the difference (-0.04 to 0.09) was within the equivalence margin (-0.13 to 0.13); the mean changes of uNTx/uCr and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (s-BALP) at each time point were also similar during 53 weeks. The differences of uNTx/uCr change were 0.015 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.09), -0.02 (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.06), -0.05 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.03) and 0.001 (95% CI, -0.10 to 0.10) at weeks 5, 25, 37, and 53, respectively. The differences of s-BALP change were -0.006 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.05), 0.00 (95% CI, -0.07 to 0.07), -0.085 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.01), -0.09 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.02), and -0.13 (95% CI, -0.27 to 0.004) at weeks 5, 13, 25, 37 and 53, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of skeletal-related events (-1.4%; 95% CI, -5.8% to 3.0%) or time to first on-study skeletal-related events (unadjusted HR, 0.86; P = .53; multiplicity adjusted HR, 0.87; P = .55) in the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: MW032 and denosumab were biosimilar in efficacy, population pharmacokinetics, and safety profile. Availability of denosumab biosimilars may broaden the access to denosumab and reduce the drug burden for patients with advanced tumors. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04812509.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Neoplasias Óseas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Denosumab , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Creatinina , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess the performance of a deep learning (DL) model, based on a combination of ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) images, for predicting malignancy in breast lesions categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) US 4A in diagnostic patients with dense breasts. METHODS: A total of 992 patients were randomly allocated into the training cohort and the test cohort at a proportion of 4:1. Another, 218 patients were enrolled to form a prospective validation cohort. The DL model was developed by incorporating both US and MG images. The predictive performance of the combined DL model for malignancy was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The combined DL model was then compared to a clinical nomogram model and to the DL model trained using US image only and to that trained MG image only. RESULTS: The combined DL model showed satisfactory diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy in breast lesions, with an AUC of 0.940 (95% CI: 0.874-1.000) in the test cohort, and an AUC of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.817-0.995) in the validation cohort, which was significantly higher than the clinical nomogram model, and the DL model for US or MG alone ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study developed an objective DL model combining both US and MG imaging features, which was proven to be more accurate for predicting malignancy in the BI-RADS US 4A breast lesions of patients with dense breasts. This model may then be used to more accurately guide clinicians' choices about whether performing biopsies in breast cancer diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Aprendizaje Profundo , Mamografía , Ultrasonografía Mamaria , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Curva ROC , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
Background: Leritrelvir is a novel α-ketoamide based peptidomimetic inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. A preclinical study has demonstrated leritrelvir poses similar antiviral activities towards different SARS-CoV-2 variants compared with nirmatrelvir. A phase 2 clinical trial has shown a comparable antiviral efficacy and safety between leritrelvir with and without ritonavir co-administration. This trial aims to test efficacy and safety of leritrelvir monotherapy in adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Methods: This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial at 29 clinical sites in China. Enrolled patients were from 18 to 75 years old, diagnosed with mild or moderate COVID-19 and not requiring hospitalization. Patients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test (NAT) and at least one of the COVID-19 symptoms within 48 h before randomization, and the interval between the first positive SARS-CoV-2 NAT and randomization was ≤120 h (5 days). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 5-day course of either oral leritrelvir 400 mg TID or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from the first dose to sustained clinical recovery of all 11 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath or dyspnea, cough, muscle or body aches, headache, chills, fever ≥37 °C, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). The safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AE). Primary and safety analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05620160. Findings: Between Nov 12 and Dec 30, 2022 when the zero COVID policy was abolished nationwide, a total of 1359 patients underwent randomization, 680 were assigned to leritrelvir group and 679 to placebo group. The median time to sustained clinical recovery in leritrelvir group was significantly shorter (251.02 h [IQR 188.95-428.68 h]) than that of Placebo (271.33 h [IQR 219.00-529.63 h], P = 0.0022, hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.35). Further analysis of subgroups for the median time to sustained clinical recovery revealed that (1) subgroup with positive viral nucleic acid tested ≤72 h had a 33.9 h difference in leritrelvir group than that of placebo; (2) the subgroup with baseline viral load >8 log 10 Copies/mL in leritrelvir group had 51.3 h difference than that of placebo. Leritrelvir reduced viral load by 0.82 log10 on day 4 compared to placebo. No participants in either group progressed to severe COVID-19 by day 29. Adverse events were reported in two groups: leritrelvir 315 (46.46%) compared with placebo 292 (43.52%). Treatment-relevant AEs were similar 218 (32.15%) in the leritrelvir group and 186 (27.72%) in placebo. Two cases of COVID-19 pneumonia were reported in placebo group, and one case in leritrelvir group, none of them were considered by the investigators to be leritrelvir related. The most frequently reported AEs (occurring in ≥5% of participants in at least one group) were laboratory finding: hypertriglyceridemia (leritrelvir 79 [11.7%] vs. placebo 70 [10.4%]) and hyperlipidemia (60 [8.8%] vs. 52 [7.7%]); all of them were nonserious. Interpretation: Leritrelvir monotherapy has good efficacy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and without serious safety concerns. Funding: This study was funded by the National Multidisciplinary Innovation Team Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Science and Technology Foundation, Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project and R&D Program of Guangzhou Laboratory.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated that magnetic resonance imaging radiomics can predict survival in patients with breast cancer, but the potential biological underpinning remains indistinct. Herein, we aim to develop an interpretable deep-learning-based network for classifying recurrence risk and revealing the potential biological mechanisms. METHODS: In this multicenter study, 1113 nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer patients were included, and were divided into the training cohort (n = 698), the validation cohort (n = 171), and the testing cohort (n = 244). The Radiomic DeepSurv Net (RDeepNet) model was constructed using the Cox proportional hazards deep neural network DeepSurv for predicting individual recurrence risk. RNA-sequencing was performed to explore the association between radiomics and tumor microenvironment. Correlation and variance analyses were conducted to examine changes of radiomics among patients with different therapeutic responses and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The association and quantitative relation of radiomics and epigenetic molecular characteristics were further analyzed to reveal the mechanisms of radiomics. RESULTS: The RDeepNet model showed a significant association with recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 0.03, 95% CI 0.02-0.06, P < 0.001) and achieved AUCs of 0.98, 0.94, and 0.92 for 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS, respectively. In the validation and testing cohorts, the RDeepNet model could also clarify patients into high- and low-risk groups, and demonstrated AUCs of 0.91 and 0.94 for 3-year RFS, respectively. Radiomic features displayed differential expression between the two risk groups. Furthermore, the generalizability of RDeepNet model was confirmed across different molecular subtypes and patient populations with different therapy regimens (All P < 0.001). The study also identified variations in radiomic features among patients with diverse therapeutic responses and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Importantly, a significant correlation between radiomics and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) was discovered. A key lncRNA was found to be noninvasively quantified by a deep learning-based radiomics prediction model with AUCs of 0.79 in the training cohort and 0.77 in the testing cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that machine learning radiomics of MRI can effectively predict RFS after surgery in patients with breast cancer, and highlights the feasibility of non-invasive quantification of lncRNAs using radiomics, which indicates the potential of radiomics in guiding treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , ARN Largo no Codificante , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , ARN Largo no Codificante/genética , Aprendizaje Automático , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy are now standard first-line therapy for advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer, but developing resistance is just a matter of time in these patients. Here, we report that a cyclin E1-interacting lncRNA (EILA) is up-regulated in CDK4/6i-resistant breast cancer cells and contributes to CDK4/6i resistance by stabilizing cyclin E1 protein. EILA overexpression correlates with accelerated cell cycle progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Silencing EILA reduces cyclin E1 protein and restores CDK4/6i sensitivity both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, hairpin A of EILA binds to the carboxyl terminus of cyclin E1 protein and hinders its binding to FBXW7, thereby blocking its ubiquitination and degradation. EILA is transcriptionally regulated by CTCF/CDK8/TFII-I complexes and can be inhibited by CDK8 inhibitors. This study unveils the role of EILA in regulating cyclin E1 stability and CDK4/6i resistance, which may serve as a biomarker to predict therapy response and a potential therapeutic target to overcome resistance.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , ARN Largo no Codificante , Humanos , Femenino , ARN Largo no Codificante/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , División Celular , Ubiquitinación , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/genéticaRESUMEN
Aim: The aim of this study was to identify potential safety concerns associated with Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting trophoblastic cell-surface antigen-2, by analyzing real-world safety data from the largest publicly available worldwide pharmacovigilance database. Methods: All data obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the second quarter of 2020 to the fourth quarter of 2022 underwent disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis to detect and assess the adverse event signals of SG, considering statistical significance when the lower limit of the 95% CI >1, based on at least 3 reports. Results: Total of 1072 cases were included. The main safety signals were blood and lymphatic system disorders [ROR(95CI)=7.23 (6.43-8.14)], gastrointestinal disorders [ROR(95CI)=2.01 (1.81-2.22)], and relative infection adverse events, such as neutropenic sepsis [ROR(95CI)=46.02 (27.15-77.99)] and neutropenic colitis [ROR(95CI)=188.02 (120.09-294.37)]. We also noted unexpected serious safety signals, including large intestine perforation [ROR(95CI)=10.77 (3.47-33.45)] and hepatic failure [ROR(95CI)=3.87 (1.45-10.31)], as well as a high signal for pneumonitis [ROR(95CI)=9.93 (5.75-17.12)]. Additionally, age sub-group analysis revealed that geriatric patients (>65 years old) were at an increased risk of neutropenic colitis [ROR(95CI)=282.05 (116.36-683.66)], neutropenic sepsis [ROR(95CI)=101.11 (41.83-244.43)], acute kidney injury [ROR(95CI)=3.29 (1.36-7.94)], and atrial fibrillation [ROR(95CI)=6.91 (2.86-16.69)]. Conclusion: This study provides crucial real-world safety data on SG, complementing existing clinical trial information. Practitioners should identify contributing factors, employ monitoring and intervention strategies, and focus on adverse events like neutropenic sepsis, large intestine perforation, and hepatic failure. Further prospective studies are needed to address these safety concerns for a comprehensive understanding and effective management of associated risks.
RESUMEN
AIMS: To construct a quality evaluation index system for clinical drug trials nursing management and obtain the weight of all indicators. DESIGN: A mixed-method research design with a quantitative component was used, primarily qualitative. METHODS: Through a literature review and semi-structured interview, an expert consultation questionnaire on the quality of nursing evaluation indicators for clinical drug trials was developed in April 2021. Eighteen experts in clinical drug trial nursing, medical, and pharmacy conducted 2 rounds of consultation according to the Delphi method to determine the indicators for evaluating the quality of clinical drug trial nursing. The weights of each indicator were determined using analytic hierarchical analysis. RESULTS: The established quality evaluation system of clinical drug trial nursing mainly includes 3 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators, and 59 third-level indicators. The positive coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90%-100%, and the authority coefficients were 0.831 and 0.885, respectively; the coordination coefficients were 0.189 and 0.214, respectively. The consulting results and weight settings are reliable. The evaluation index system we constructed is in line with the characteristics of the clinical drug trial nursing profession, with clear index levels and strong clinical operability, which can provide a reference for the assessment, monitoring and improvement of nursing quality in clinical drug trials. It will also clarify how nurses contribute to subjects' safety.
Asunto(s)
Procesos de Grupo , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play an important role in cancer metastasis. Exploring metastasis-associated lncRNAs and developing effective strategy for targeted regulation of lncRNA function in vivo are of utmost importance for the treatment of metastatic cancer, which however remains a big challenge. Herein, we identified a new functional lncRNA (denoted lncBCMA), which could stabilize the expression of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A1 (eEF1A1) via antagonizing its ubiquitination to promote triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) growth and metastasis. Based on this regulatory mechanism, an endosomal pH-responsive nanoparticle (NP) platform was engineered for systemic lncBCMA siRNA (siBCMA) delivery. This NPs-mediated siBCMA delivery could effectively silence lncBCMA expression and promote eEF1A1 ubiquitination, thereby leading to a significant inhibition of TNBC tumor growth and metastasis. These findings show that lncBCMA could be used as a potential biomarker to predict the prognosis of TNBC patients and NPs-mediated lncBCMA silencing could be an effective strategy for metastatic TNBC treatment.