Progesterone receptor B over progesterone receptor A prevents recurrence in bilateral endometriomas.

OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis is a disease in which stromal cells and endometrial glands extend outside of the uterine cavity. Nevertheless, treatment failure and recurrence cause difficulties in management. This study aimed to evaluate the receptor-level components of bilateral endometriomas in the recurrence state. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent surgery for bilateral endometriomas between 2015 and 2021. In total, 113 patients were allocated. A total of 76 patients did not meet the eligibility criteria, and the data of 37 patients were evaluated. Medical treatments, recurrences, and postoperative follow-up data were collected. In archived tissue samples, measurements of progesterone receptor A and progesterone receptor B, histoscores and immunoreactivity scores, and their ratios were calculated in the group that received no postoperative medical treatment. Criteria for recurrence were a repeat operation and/or the detection of a new endometrioma>2 cm at the follow-up examination. RESULTS: No recurrence was observed in 73.0% (n=27) of the cases, whereas recurrence was observed in 27.0% (n=10) of the participants. Patients without recurrence had significantly higher progesterone receptor B histoscore/progesterone receptor A histoscore and progesterone receptor B immunoreactivity score/progesterone receptor A immunoreactivity score results (p=0.01). Nevertheless, when the histoscores and immunoreactivity scores for both receptors were contrasted separately, there was no appreciable difference between them. CONCLUSION: The dominance of progesterone receptor B over progesterone receptor A was inversely proportional to the recurrence status in bilateral endometriomas. Furthermore, our study revealed that assessing receptor levels alone did not result in a significant difference in recurrence.

Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection experiences in endometrial cancer at our tertiary cancer treatment institution.

OBJECTIVE: In endometrial cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node dissection is used instead of staging surgery, particularly in advanced disease that is limited to the uterus. The aim of this study is to evaluate our practice of robotic sentinel lymph node dissection, which is applied to endometrial cancer patients in our tertiary cancer treatment center, according to the current literature, and to share our own data. METHODS: Included in our analysis are patients who underwent robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer utilizing indocyanine green in our center between January 2018 and January 2024. RESULTS: In all, of the 93 endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 63 were classified as low-risk, while 30 were high-risk according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We found sentinel lymph nodes in both low-risk and high-risk patients, with an overall sensitivity of 96.32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.12-99.71), specificity of 100% (95%CI, 92.20-99.8), negative predictive value of 96.72% (95%CI, 87.03-99.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01-0.36). CONCLUSION: After evaluating our data retrospectively, we determined that we were compatible with the current literature.

Progesterone receptor B over progesterone receptor A prevents recurrence in bilateral endometriomas

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis is a disease in which stromal cells and endometrial glands extend outside of the uterine cavity. Nevertheless, treatment failure and recurrence cause difficulties in management. This study aimed to evaluate the receptor-level components of bilateral endometriomas in the recurrence state. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent surgery for bilateral endometriomas between 2015 and 2021. In total, 113 patients were allocated. A total of 76 patients did not meet the eligibility criteria, and the data of 37 patients were evaluated. Medical treatments, recurrences, and postoperative follow-up data were collected. In archived tissue samples, measurements of progesterone receptor A and progesterone receptor B, histoscores and immunoreactivity scores, and their ratios were calculated in the group that received no postoperative medical treatment. Criteria for recurrence were a repeat operation and/or the detection of a new endometrioma>2 cm at the follow-up examination. RESULTS: No recurrence was observed in 73.0% (n=27) of the cases, whereas recurrence was observed in 27.0% (n=10) of the participants. Patients without recurrence had significantly higher progesterone receptor B histoscore/progesterone receptor A histoscore and progesterone receptor B immunoreactivity score/progesterone receptor A immunoreactivity score results (p=0.01). Nevertheless, when the histoscores and immunoreactivity scores for both receptors were contrasted separately, there was no appreciable difference between them. CONCLUSION: The dominance of progesterone receptor B over progesterone receptor A was inversely proportional to the recurrence status in bilateral endometriomas. Furthermore, our study revealed that assessing receptor levels alone did not result in a significant difference in recurrence.

Effect of adenomyosis on prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to contrast the prognoses of patients with endometrial cancer who had adenomyosis against those that did not. METHODS: All patients who had received surgical staging for hysterectomy-based endometrial cancer had their medical data retrospectively examined. The analysis covered 397 patients, who were split into two groups depending on the presence of adenomyosis. Comparisons were made between patients covering type of surgery, histopathology, endometrial cancer stage, lymphovascular space invasion, presence of biochemical or histochemical markers, adjuvant therapy, presence of adenomyosis in the myometrial wall, and outcomes in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS: There is no statistically significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival or overall survival rates between endometrial cancer patients with and without adenomyosis. This is based on comparisons of tumor stage, tumor diameter, histological type and grade of tumor, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and biochemical markers that affect the course of the disease. The median follow-up times were 61 months for the adenomyosis-positive group and 56 months for the group without adenomyosis. CONCLUSION: Coexisting adenomyosis in endometrial cancer has no bearing on survival rates and is not a prognostic factor.