RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of state-level lack of health insurance among women of reproductive age with variation in state low birth weight (LBW) rates. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-section study analyzes data from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey for respondents with singleton, live births. METHODS: Respondents were divided into groups by state-level percent of uninsured women aged 19-44 years. Poisson regression was used to model the association between state percent uninsured and likelihood of LBW, controlling for individual sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. Sensitivity analyses were done for Medicaid and non-Hispanic Black subpopulations and alternative state characteristics, including Gini coefficients, total and public welfare expenditures, and state reproductive rights rankings. RESULTS: In adjusted multiple regression analyses, compared to respondents from states with <7% uninsured, respondents from states with 7% or more uninsured had an increased risk of LBW status (7-8.99% uninsured: adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.18; 9-11.99% uninsured: aIRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17; >11.99% uninsured: aIRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.22). However, there was no evident dose-response gradient. Sensitivity analyses produced virtually identical findings for subpopulations, and no other state characteristics were significant. CONCLUSION: States with the highest level of insurance coverage had a significantly lower LBW rate than other states. However, there was little evidence for greater odds of LBW with the highest levels of uninsured. Individual risk factors dominated LBW models, while state differences in income inequality, reproductive health policy, and per capita spending explained little of the variance in LBW.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Femenino , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Medicaid , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) measurements aid in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy; however, there is empirical variability across panel assays and factors contributing to this variability have not been comprehensively investigated. Identifying sources of variability can help facilitate comparability across different panel assays, which may aid in broader adoption of panel assays and development of clinical applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine tumor samples and 10 human-derived cell lines were processed and distributed to 16 laboratories; each used their own bioinformatics pipelines to calculate TMB and compare to whole exome results. Additionally, theoretical positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of TMB were estimated. The impact of filtering pathogenic and germline variants on TMB estimates was assessed. Calibration curves specific to each panel assay were developed to facilitate translation of panel TMB values to whole exome sequencing (WES) TMB values. RESULTS: Panel sizes >667 Kb are necessary to maintain adequate PPA and NPA for calling TMB high versus TMB low across the range of cut-offs used in practice. Failure to filter out pathogenic variants when estimating panel TMB resulted in overestimating TMB relative to WES for all assays. Filtering out potential germline variants at >0% population minor allele frequency resulted in the strongest correlation to WES TMB. Application of a calibration approach derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas data, tailored to each panel assay, reduced the spread of panel TMB values around the WES TMB as reflected in lower root mean squared error (RMSE) for 26/29 (90%) of the clinical samples. CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of TMB varies across different panels, with panel size, gene content, and bioinformatics pipelines contributing to empirical variability. Statistical calibration can achieve more consistent results across panels and allows for comparison of TMB values across various panel assays. To promote reproducibility and comparability across assays, a software tool was developed and made publicly available.
Asunto(s)
Mutación , Neoplasias , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
In our perinatal HIV cohort, we have observed difficulty swallowing pills as a frequent and significant barrier to adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy. We refer to this problem as pill aversion and define it as difficulty swallowing pills with no persistent medical or structural cause as well as the anxiety and physical symptoms associated with pill swallowing. By applying cognitive behavioral theory to behavioral patterns within our pregnant HIV-infected population, we seek to better understand the development and reinforcement of pill aversion behavior. On the basis of this theory, our experience, and the pediatric pill-swallowing literature, we propose a conceptual framework for understanding the multiple causes of pill aversion and applying therapeutic interventions to a perinatal population. In a theoretical discussion, we address the roles of classical conditioning and cognitive theory in the development and experience of pill aversion in an HIV-infected pregnant population. We propose future steps for characterizing these behaviors and testing theories and interventions.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Deglución , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Comprimidos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Condicionamiento Clásico , Femenino , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Embarazo/psicología , Teoría PsicoanalíticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize pregnant patients' knowledge, attitudes and preferences regarding antenatal HIV testing for themselves and their sexual partners. STUDY DESIGN: Observational, mixed methods study of HIV-negative pregnant women from a university-based urban clinic. Participants completed an anonymous survey about HIV testing for themselves and their partners. Descriptive statistics, bivariable analyses, multivariable logistic regression and qualitative thematic analysis were utilized. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients (mean age 28.6±5.5 years) participated. A majority (57.7%) were married or partnered, and 92.9% reported having at least one current sexual partner. Although a majority (62.8%) reported their partner had a prior HIV test, and 93.0% of these women were aware of test results, only 20.7% reported partner testing had occurred in the past 6 months. Women who had a prior HIV test, who were older or who were non-white were more likely to be aware of their partner's HIV status. A majority (66.9%) of women desired knowledge of their partner's current status and 76.0% believed their partners would like to know his HIV status; in addition, 74% were interested in receiving partner testing at the site of prenatal care. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that health concerns and believing HIV knowledge is important to the relationship were motivators for desiring partner testing. CONCLUSIONS: In this urban community, a majority of pregnant women do not know HIV test results of their sexual partner during the current pregnancy. Women desired to know their partner's HIV status and were receptive to partner testing at the site of prenatal care or other locations. Partner testing may be a critical step toward elimination of seroconversion during pregnancy and maternal-to-child HIV transmission.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Parejas Sexuales , Adulto , Chicago , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Necesidades , Embarazo , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , Atención Prenatal , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between interdelivery interval (IDI) and subsequent perinatal outcomes in a large population-based cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with singleton gestations giving birth in the US in 2011 to 2012. IDI was defined as the time between last live birth and index live birth. IDI was categorized as 4 to 17 months, 18 to 36 months (referent), 37 to 60 months and >60 months. Statistical comparisons were made using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models to control for confounding. Covariates included maternal age, prior preterm birth, prior cesarean and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 1 964 523 women meeting study criteria, 9.0% had an IDI of 4 to 17 months, 39.7% 18 to 36 months, 26.8% 37 to 60 months and 24.5% >60 months. Short IDI was associated with preterm delivery (<37 weeks; 13.8 vs 8.8%, (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48 to 1.53)) and adverse perinatal outcomes including low 5-min Apgar, small for gestational age (SGA) status and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Women with long IDI had a higher risk of induction of labor, cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, maternal ICU admission, preterm delivery and SGA status, 5-min Apgar score <4, and NICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with women with 18 to 36 month IDIs, women with either shorter or very long IDIs were at an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Intervalo entre Nacimientos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Edad Materna , Análisis Multivariante , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively identify factors promoting healthy self-management of gestational and type 2 diabetes mellitus among underserved pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-nine in-depth, semi-structured interviews were performed over the course of pregnancy for 10 women with diabetes. Interviews on factors promoting diabetes self-management used cognitive load theory to frame questions. Qualitative analysis of longitudinal interview data applied grounded theory techniques to generate themes. RESULT: Half this cohort of minority, low-income, public aid-supported women had type 2 diabetes. Four themes, comprised of both internal self-driven motivators and external sources of support, were identified. These themes were: (1) disease familiarity and diabetes self-efficacy; (2) external motivation (for health of fetus and responsibilities to older children); (3) supportive social and physical environment; and (4) self-regulatory behavior, including goal responsiveness and long-term goal-setting. CONCLUSION: Low-income women used multiple internal and external resources to promote health during a pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Successful behavior modification and achievement of diabetes care goals require leveraging these resources.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Diabetes Gestacional/etnología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etnología , Autocuidado/normas , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Grupos Minoritarios , Motivación , Pobreza , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULT: Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Ploidias , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Adulto , Cromosomas Humanos Par 18 , Estudios de Cohortes , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Cariotipificación , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18 , Ultrasonografía PrenatalRESUMEN
A cross-sectional prevalence survey of asbestosis, including all 1,140 employees of a diversified asbestos products manufacturer, was conducted in 1932 by Drs. Anthony J. Lanza and Frank V. Meriwether. Occupational histories were obtained from workers in order to identify job tasks with exposure to asbestos and other fibrogenic dusts. Abbreviated medical histories, physical examinations, fluoroscopy, and chest radiographs were performed. Radiographs were interpreted according to applicable criteria for pneumoconiosis, the presence of which was confirmed in 327 subjects (29%). Among those, 64% had previous exposure to dusts in addition to asbestos, coal being the leading non-asbestos exposure. Thirty-six percent of cases had prior exposure only to asbestos dust. The original conclusions do not survive. Contemporaneous related documents suggest that the original authors believed asbestosis to be a milder form of lung disease than silicosis. It was subsequently recommended that the company institute pre-employment physicals, including chest radiographs; not hire people with prior coal-dust exposure; warn workers against excessive exposure to asbestos dust; remove those with disease to less dusty areas; and begin periodic medical surveillance for pneumoconiosis. The study, which has never appeared in the medical or scientific literature, holds important lessons for those concerned with occupational health today and in the future.
Asunto(s)
Asbestosis/historia , Asbestosis/epidemiología , Asbestosis/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , New Jersey , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , SilicosisRESUMEN
A semicomatose victim of presumed carbon monoxide poisoning was referred to our hyperbaric chamber facility from a local Japanese hospital after having been treated with an exchange transfusion of 2 L. whole blood. A series of three hyperbaric oxygenation dives, steroid therapy, and supportive measures were used to successfully revive him from semicoma. He has since displayed no signs or symptoms of psychiatric or neurological sequelae.