ALPPS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Associated with Decreased Liver Remnant Growth.

BACKGROUND: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been widely described for colorectal liver metastases with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). However, its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poorly defined and not widely accepted. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of clinical data, liver volumetry, histological characteristics, and surgical outcomes between nine HCC and four non-HCC patients who underwent ALPPS was performed. RESULTS: Patients with HCC were more likely to have histological evidence of hepatic fibrosis (HCC vs. non-HCC, 66.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.049). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were otherwise comparable between both groups. FLR growth after ALPPS-Stage 1 was significantly less in HCC patients (HCC vs. non-HCC, 154.5 vs. 251.0 ml, p = 0.012). FLR growth was also significantly decreased in patients with hepatic fibrosis (fibrosis vs. non-fibrosis, 157.5 vs. 247.5 ml, p = 0.033). There was no difference in post-hepatectomy liver failure (HCC vs. non-HCC, 28.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.721) or 90-day mortality (HCC vs. non-HCC, 11.1 vs. 0%, p = NS). DISCUSSION: In our study, HCC patients demonstrated significantly less FLR growth after ALPPS-Stage 1 compared to non-HCC patients. Hepatic fibrosis was also found to negatively impact FLR growth. When considering suitability for ALPPS, patients with HCC may benefit from additional pre-operative assessment of fibrosis.

Greater hypertrophy can be achieved with associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy compared to conventional staged hepatectomy, but with a higher price to pay?

BACKGROUND: Associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and conventional staged hepatectomy (CSH) are options for patients with unresectable liver tumors due to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS: A retrospective comparison of clinical data, liver volumetry and surgical outcomes between 10 ALPPS and 29 CSH patients was performed. RESULTS: Patient demographics and disease characteristics were similar between both groups. ALPPS induced superior FLR growth (ALPPS vs. CSH, 48.1% (IQR 39.4-96.9%) vs. 11.8% (IQR 4.3-41.9%), p = 0.013). However, post-operative day 5 international normalized ratio (INR) (ALPPS vs. CSH, 1.6 (IQR 1.5-1.8) vs. 1.4 (IQR 1.3-1.6), p = 0.015) and rate of post-hepatectomy liver failure (ALPPS vs. CSH, 25 vs. 0%, p = 0.032) was higher in the ALPPS group. 90-day mortality (ALPPS vs. CSH, 12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.320) was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: ALPPS was superior in inducing FLR growth but associated with increased post-hepatectomy liver failure compared to CSH.