Venous resection for pancreatic cancer, a safe and feasible option? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with suspected venous infiltration, a R0 resection is most of the time not possible without venous resection (VR). To investigate this special kind of patients, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare mortality, morbidity and long-term survival of pancreatic resections with (VR+) and without venous resection (VR-). METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Embase, Pubmed and Web of Science. Studies which compared over twenty patients with VR + to VR-for PDAC with ≥1 year follow up were included. Articles including arterial resections were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed with the random effect Mantel-Haenszel test and inversed variance method. Individual patient data was compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Following a review of 6403 papers by title and abstract and 166 by full text, a meta-analysis was conducted of 32 studies describing 2216 VR+ and 5380 VR-. There was significantly more post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (6.5% vs. 5.6%), R1 resections (36.7% vs. 28.6%), N1 resections (70.3% vs. 66.8%) and tumors were significantly larger (34.6 mm vs. 32.8 mm) in patients with VR+. Of all VR + patients, 64.6% had true pathological venous infiltration. The 90-day mortality, individual patient data for overall survival and pooled multivariate hazard ratio for overall survival were similar. CONCLUSION: VR is a safe and feasible option in patients with pancreatic cancer and suspicion of venous involvement, since VR during pancreatic surgery has comparable overall survival and complication rates.

A comparative evaluation of segmental analysis of macular layers in patients with early glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and healthy eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare macular layer thicknesses between early glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and healthy eyes and to evaluate the accuracy of spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) segmentation software in discriminating early glaucoma from ocular hypertension and healthy eyes. METHODS: OCT scans were performed using the standard macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) protocols on the Spectralis-OCT. The following macular thickness parameters were compared in the inner and outer circles of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study: total macular thickness (MT), retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell layer (mGCL), inner plexiform layer (mIPL), inner nuclear layer (mINL), outer plexiform layer (mOPL), outer nuclear layer (mONL) and ganglion cell complex (mGCC: sum of mRNFL, mGCL, and mIPL). Sectors and layers with the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were determined and compared between groups. RESULTS: Of a total of 200 eyes included in this study, 64 eyes had primary open angle glaucoma, 69 had ocular hypertension, and 67 were healthy. Peripapillary RNFL was significantly thinner in the early glaucoma group (P<0.05). For the macular variables, there was a significant reduction in the MT, mGCC, mRNFL, mGCL, and mIPL thicknesses in the early glaucoma group; while there were no statistically significant differences between the ocular hypertension and control groups (P>0.05). For distinguishing early glaucoma from normal eyes, AUCs for mGCC, mGCL, and mRNFL were similar to the pRNFL; and for early glaucoma and ocular hypertension, AUCs for mGCC, mGCL mRNF and mIPL were comparable to the pRNFL. CONCLUSION: Macular segmentation can assist in the early diagnosis of glaucoma as a complementary study to pRNFL analysis.

In the Era of the Leeds Protocol: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Resection Margins on Survival Among Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A positive resection margin is considered to be a factor associated with poor prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection. However, analysis of the resection margin is dependent on the pathological slicing technique. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the impact of resection margin on the survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients whose specimens were analyzed using the axial slicing technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase datasets covering the time period from November 2006 to January 2019 was performed. Only studies with axial slicing technique (Leeds Pathology Protocol or Royal College of Pathology Protocol) were included in the final database. Meta-analysis between the marginal distance and survival was performed with the Inverse Variance Method in RevMan. RESULTS: The systematic search resulted in nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The median survival for a resection margin 0 mm ranged from 12.3 to 23.4 months, for resection margin <0.5 mm 16 months, for resection margin <1 mm ranged from 11 to 27.5 months, for resection margin <1.5 mm ranged from 16.9 to 21.2 months, and for resection margin >2 mm ranged from 53.9 to 63.1 months. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled multivariable hazard ratio favored resection margin ⩾1 mm (hazard ratio: 1.32 and 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.68, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Resection margins ⩾1 mm seem to lead to better survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients than resection margin <1 mm. However, there is not enough data to evaluate the effect of oncologic therapy or to analyze the impact of other resection margin distances on survival.