Immunologic and virologic evolution during periods of intermittent and persistent low-level viremia.

BACKGROUND: HIV replication, HIV-specific T-cell responses and T-cell activation each contributes to disease outcome during untreated HIV infection. The interaction of these factors is not well understood, particularly in the setting of antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: This is a longitudinal study of antiretroviral-treated patients with plasma HIV RNA levels < 1000 copies/ml. Patients were divided into three groups: suppressed viremia, intermittent viremia ('blips') and persistent low-level viremia. HIV-specific immunity was measured using interferon-gamma ELISPOT. T-cell activation was defined by CD38 and HLA-DR co-expression. Drug resistance was quantified using a phenotypic susceptibility assay. RESULTS: The breadth and the magnitude of the HIV-specific CD8 T-cell response was greater in patients with either intermittent or persistent viremia compared to patients with suppressed viremia. In contrast, T-cell activation was significantly elevated only in those patients with persistent viremia. Patients with persistent low-level viremia had moderate levels of phenotypic antiretroviral drug resistance that increased over time. Virologic failure (confirmed increase in viral load > 1000 HIV RNA copies/ml) was primarily observed in the persistently viremic group. CONCLUSIONS: Antiretroviral-treated individuals with intermittent viremia appear to mount an effective HIV-specific T-cell response while not experiencing increases in the level of immune activation. This may limit viral evolution and emergence of drug resistance. In contrast, antiretroviral-treated individuals with persistent low-level viremia exhibit significant increases in overall immune activation and a substantial risk of subsequent treatment failure. It is likely that higher viremia and stronger immune activation act synergistically to accelerate the development of systemic drug resistance.

Comparison of the ELISPOT and cytokine flow cytometry assays for the enumeration of antigen-specific T cells.

The enumeration of antigen-specific T cell responses has been greatly facilitated in recent years by the development of methods based on the detection of cytokines. In particular, the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) and cytokine flow cytometry (CFC) assays have become popular. Since both assays are likely to continue to be in widespread use, it is important to evaluate whether their results are comparable. In the current study, we compared the results obtained in the ELISPOT and CFC assays using peptide pools corresponding to CMV and HIV-1 proteins in chronically HIV-1-infected individuals. Analysis of T cell responses to peptide pools indicated that the CMV pp65 and HIV-1 Gag CFC and ELISPOT-derived results were statistically correlated. However, the results obtained with each assay differed in important ways: the magnitude of the response was consistently higher in the CFC assay while the CFC assay was less likely than the ELISPOT assay to detect low-level responses. Furthermore, there was a lack of numeric agreement between ELISPOT and CFC results. For studies that require the detection of low-level responses, or definition of responses as positive or negative, the ELISPOT assay may be preferable. In contrast, the CFC has a greater dynamic range and allows for phenotypic discrimination of responding cells, making it the assay of choice for most other applications.

Dual pressure from antiretroviral therapy and cell-mediated immune response on the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease gene.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8(+) T-lymphocyte pressure can lead to the development of viral escape mutants, with consequent loss of immune control. Antiretroviral drugs also exert selection pressures on HIV, leading to the emergence of drug resistance mutations and increased levels of viral replication. We have determined a minimal epitope of HIV protease, amino acids 76 to 84, towards which a CD8(+) T-lymphocyte response is directed. This epitope, which is HLA-A2 restricted, includes two amino acids that commonly mutate (V82A and I84V) in the face of protease inhibitor therapy. Among 29 HIV-infected patients who were treated with protease inhibitors and who had developed resistance to these drugs, we show that the wild-type PR82V(76-84) epitope is commonly recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in HLA-A2-positive patients and that the CTL directed to this epitope are of high avidity. In contrast, the mutant PR82A(76-84) epitope is generally not recognized by wild-type-specific CTL, or when recognized it is of low to moderate avidity, suggesting that the protease inhibitor-selected V82A mutation acts both as a CTL and protease inhibitor escape mutant. Paradoxically, the absence of a mutation at position 82 was associated with the presence of a high-avidity CD8(+) T-cell response to the wild-type virus sequence. Our results indicate that both HIV type 1-specific CD8(+) T cells and antiretroviral drugs provide complex pressures on the same amino acid sequence of the HIV protease gene and, thus, can influence viral sequence evolution.